MD Trend Pro stops you from either jumping in too early on noise, or missing
the move altogether by waiting for "perfect" confirmation.
https://t.co/jPNsiGU2JS
Open-source free TradingView Premium just reached 33K stars on a private repo, but people keep spending money on the original version?
Why?
From getting constantly overcharged to losing money on trades because of constant lag, this version doesn't have those issues.
Sharing the guide below 👇
MD ConfluenceReversal v5 Mt4 No Repaint
A Propfirm Trading Solution . 1 or 2 Trades/day on US session System with 70+% winrate .almost My 8+ Years of experience Behind this System.With alerts and Supported Tamplate. A gift for Struggling Traders. .https://t.co/dRkw7eGJEF
A one-minute or less trade duration and a strict maximum lot size Rules are mostly forgotten by traders.this tool help me ride these problems.Recommend.
https://t.co/qmgkOxFUTL
Risk calculated, not guessed. 📊
Drag your Entry/SL/TP lines — lot size, $ risk, and RR update live. Auto breakeven. Live trade duration for prop-firm hold rules.
MD Trade Manager — MQL5 Market
🔗 https://t.co/08rTO6UZhh
You're down $200 on two trades.
Instead of stopping, you size up trying to make it back.
By the end of the day you're down $600.
You would have taken the $200 loss in a heartbeat now. But two hours ago your brain wouldn't let you.
Here's what's actually happening and how to fix it. 🧵
A guy messaged me a few months ago.
He'd been trading for 3 years and had passed exactly zero prop firm challenges.
Not because he couldn't trade.
Because he kept doing this:
Day 1 of a new challenge - calm, focused, patient.
Day 3 or 4 - up 1.5%, everything going well.
Then one bad day. Down 0.8%.
And instead of treating it like a normal losing day - he'd panic.
Start taking extra trades to "get it back."
By end of day he was down 1.9% total.
Next day, same thing. Digging deeper.
Every single challenge ended the same way.
Not from the first loss.
From what he did AFTER the first loss.
I asked him to pull up his last 5 challenge accounts and track where exactly they failed.
In 4 out of 5 - the account was fine after day one of a drawdown.
It was the revenge trading on day 2 and 3 that killed it.
So we made one rule:
If he hit his daily loss limit - he closed the platform. Done. No exceptions.
No "just one more trade to recover."
No "the setup is perfect though."
Closed. Gone. Come back tomorrow.
He passed his next challenge in 19 days.
First payout was $1,800.
Six months later he had 6 funded accounts and $480k in capital.
The trading was never the problem.
It was the 24 hours after a losing day.
If you keep failing challenges - go look at your data.
I'd bet the account isn't dying on the first red day.
It's dying from what you do next.
I spoke to a trader last year who had passed 0 prop firm challenges in 18 months.
Not because he didn't have an edge.
Because he couldn't follow his own rules.
He'd backtest his system. Get a 63% win rate. 1.34R average. Clean results.
Then go live and do the complete opposite.
Chase entries. Move stops. Exit trades early because 'it felt like it was going to reverse.'
He'd spent over $7,000 in challenge fees by the time we spoke.
I asked him what the problem was.
He said: 'I just can't trust my system when I'm in a live trade.'
So I asked him a different question:
'When you break your rules - what are you actually afraid of?'
He thought about it for a while.
'Losing the account.'
There it was.
He wasn't breaking rules because he was undisciplined.
He was breaking rules because every trade felt like a threat to his survival.
His nervous system was treating a $500 challenge like his life was on the line.
So we changed how he thought about it.
Instead of 'I need to protect this account' - the new frame was:
'This is one trade in a series of 200. My job is just to execute it correctly.'
Not the outcome. Not the account. Just the execution.
He started grading himself on process - not profit.
Did I wait for my entry? Yes or no.
Did I set my stop where my plan said? Yes or no.
Did I let price hit TP or stop without interfering? Yes or no.
A perfect trade to him was now a 3/3 on those questions. Not a winning trade.
Within 6 weeks he passed his first $100k challenge.
Then two more in the following month.
Same strategy he'd had for 18 months.
Same markets. Same sessions. Same RR.
The only thing that changed was what he defined as success on any given trade.
Most traders lose accounts because their rules are bad.
Some lose them because their rules are fine - but every trade feels like a life or death decision.
If that's you, the fix isn't more discipline.
It's detaching the outcome of one trade from your sense of survival.
I blew over 100 prop firm accounts before my first consistent payout
Here are the mistakes I made - and what finally changed to get me to $2M+ in payouts 👇
I had a 63% win rate on demo.
Backtested over 200 trades.
My model was proven. My entries were clean. My risk management was flawless.
Then I went live and lost money for 4 straight months.
Same strategy. Same setups. Same everything.
Here's what nobody tells you about the gap between demo and live 👇
🚨 Concern About Blueberry Funded 🚨
A trader has reported that @BlueberryFunded terminated his $200K funded account while he was already up 3% and denied his payout, claiming the account was breached due to a login from a Nigerian iPhone device.
According to the trader:
• He never shared his login credentials
• He never shared his investor (read-only) password
• He fully cooperated with the investigation
• He provided all device details, MT5 login history, IP, and ISP information
Despite this, the firm:
• Provided no login proof
• Did not clarify whether it was investor (read-only) access
• Stopped responding to emails
• Immediately terminated the account
It’s important to note that an investor password only provides read-only access and cannot execute trades.
A simple security step like resetting passwords could have secured the account, but instead the decision was:
“Account breached. Decision final.”
When traders put months of effort into passing a $200K account, they deserve transparency, evidence, and fair communication before such major actions are taken.
We hope @BlueberryFunded reviews this case and provides a clear explanation for the trading community.