For the record, the @guardian did not "hack" Isabel Oakeshott's computer. The only hack in this story is Isabel Oakeshott for putting her personal interests ahead of Britain. She withheld information about Russian involvement in Brexit. She knew what she was doing.
Hope I’m wrong, but Commons proceedings today shaping up to be a travesty of democracy. Stitch ups that put Tory party before interests of country, 20 year old devolution convention ripped up with little debate/no vote. Let’s hope that Commons at least demands vote on final deal.
@jedclef Desperately rewriting history. If Corbyn had put a fraction of the energy into the Remain campaign that he put into his own leadership campaigns we wouldn't be here. Sick of having to explain this over and over again.
Senior brexiter: “If Theresa and Julian have sold us out here they are in real trouble. She reassured us all at the 1922. There is no way she can recover if she has now fucked us over.”
I have no idea whether Putin tried to interfere in the campaign for Brexit. An investigation is needed.
But Russia didn’t influence MY vote and I doubt they influenced anyone else.
Desperate Remoaners are deluded to claim this undermines the legitimacy of the Brexit vote.
I never said it would be beneficial to leave the EU explains man who spent 15 years saying we’d be better off outside EU https://t.co/KjIgL4sWIm via @newsthump
Brexit is ruining this country - time to pause and review. I think I can now see the logic of a second vote - which I have opposed - as the reality of the economic damage becomes clear and the extent of cheating by Vote Leave / Russian interference has become apparent https://t.co/NcVoSrzWFx
Jesus. Really? To broadcast more of their defamatory lies? Here's a suggestion, @Nigel_Farage. Invite me on too. You were too coward to take my call on @lbc yesterday. Why? https://t.co/8LqZ6OSHmX
@IsabelOakeshott This doesn't explain why you withheld evidence of wrongdoing and called the person investigating it a fantasist while knowing she was right.