Director of communications for Elonmusk, Responsible for connecting Real supporters to his verified official channel .... if I follow you, you’re Qualified
📢 MY FOREMOST RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PROTECT ELON'S LEGITIMATE ONLINE PRESENCE AND IDENTITY FROM IMPERSONATION
CONCURRENTLY,I PROACTIVELY
IDENTIFY& ENGAGE WITH EXCEPTIONALLY MOTIVATED, INNOVATIVE INDIVIDUALS WHO OFFER ORIGINAL THINKING AND SINCERE PASSION.
GOD BLESS AMERICA 🇺🇸
Elon Musk: "If you're trying to figure out what others love, but you don't love it, it's really hard to make that great,
So when you work on something, if you fall in love with it, that's a good sign – and then don't worry about if others do. If you do, others will"
Be honest, my queen ❤️👇
Do you still have love for me, or have you fallen out of love? 🥺❤️
A. I still love you ❤️
B. I’m not sure anymore 💔
Which one would you choose? 👀
Good morning, my darling ❤️😘. I hope you slept well. I wish I could be there to make you smile this morning. I miss you so much, and you’re always on my mind,
Am really glad to call you my Queen 🥰😘💞😘😘😚😘💓😚
BREAKING: War Secretary Pete Hegseth has named @elonmusk to co-lead Project Meridian, a major new Pentagon effort to study and shape the future of warfare.
Hegseth called the three co-leaders some of America’s best minds.
Key details:
• Co-led by Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey and Newt Gingrich
• Led within the department by CTO Emil Michael
• Will bring together private-sector leaders and military experts
• Will map the future of wars, military domains and emerging technologies
• Will identify the areas America must lead and dominate
• Findings are expected within 120 days
• A full public rollout will follow
Elon has repeatedly solved engineering challenges others considered impossible. This is exactly where he belongs, working on the hardest problems with enormous national importance.
Elon Musk joined today’s State of the Force address, where War Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Elon will co-lead Project Meridian to help shape the future of warfare. 🇺🇸
I find it funny that some people got hung up on Starship not having gone orbital before Flight 14 when in the grand scheme of things it was completely arbitrary in terms of performance. The 19ish second burn only added about 91 m/s of velocity (a 1.2% increase in velocity)
This capability has been physically capable since Flight 6 which demonstrated a single Raptor relight in space. Heck, Flight 13’s burn was about 14 seconds, but intentionally oriented to primarily do a plane change instead of a prograde insertion burn for continued safety.
Any of the relights COULD have done the orbital insertion burn, the duration was not of any special technical capability. The reason Starship didn’t go orbital until Flight 14 is probably what we should applaud them for the most… SAFETY.
Their methodical approach to getting good data and going one step at a time while hucking the single most massive object ever put into space proves they weren’t just doing things haphazardly, despite the occasional narrative from the outside.
While it’s easy to compare Starship to vehicles like SLS or Vulcan or New Glenn, the reality is the focus hasn’t been on orbit, it’s been all on the “downhill” side of that. Safe and targeted de-orbit, clean reentry, targeted and soft splashdown. That’s the part that has (almost) never been done before.
And here I do have to add a little Space Shuttle admiration for figuring out a lot of these things on its first flight in 1981 (although it came a bit close to not being successful). Pretty amazing there was a vehicle of similar scale capable of such precise deorbit and reentry that it landed on a runway with no go-around capabilities. Crazy.
But Starship is well on a path to absolutely leap-frog the Space Shuttle in terms of performance (already over double and someday 6 fold) and hopefully in terms of full and rapid reuse. I hope we see the latter part speed up even more now that orbit has been demonstrated.
Exciting times ahead!!! Keep going @spacex@elonmusk