EmmCee

I support Pierre Poilievre. 🍁

[Sonduren Fanarredha @lifewitsonduren]

GOODLIFE FITNESS HAS TO PUT A SIGN TELLING PEOPLE TO STOP POOPING AND PEEING IN THE SAUNAS. What is WRONG with people?!

[Brian Lilley @brianlilley]

Well, Poilievre accused Carney of ducking questions on Canada's economy and then, Carney literally ducked a question on the sluggish economy.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

This is Canada. This lobotomized feminization of the Canadian ethos has turned Canada into an asexually reproducing nation.

[Michelle Rempel Garner @MichelleRempel]

For Canada to work, Parliament has to be seen to be a relevant place for regional grievances to be heard and addressed by the federal government.

If the PM openly demonstrates that Parliament is beneath him, people will conclude that Canada doesn't work.

Over to you, Carney.

[Warren Kinsella @kinsellawarren]

My colleague @joe_warmington getting the scoop that no one else did. @TheTorontoSun

[Andrew Scheer @AndrewScheer]

Stephen Guilbeault announced his retirement today. While I have a certain level of respect for anyone who puts their name on a ballot, I could never respect the damaging policies he imposed on Canadians.

The good news for Guilbeault’s legacy is bad news for Canadians.

Here’s why:

Carney is keeping Guilbeault’s No-More-Pipelines bill on the books.

Carney is keeping the industrial carbon tax, and hiking it.

Carney is keeping the radical EV mandate, making almost all gas and diesel car sales illegal by 2040.

Carney is keeping the west coast shipping ban, blocking Canadian energy exports.

Carney is keeping the net-zero policies in place.

In his book called Values, Carney supported all of Guilbeault’s radical policies to leave oil and gas in the ground.

So as Guilbeault leaves Ottawa, he can take personal comfort knowing that Carney is keeping all the anti-development, high energy cost policies in place.

[Michelle Rempel Garner @MichelleRempel]

74,000 bogus asylum claimants are getting benefits like vision care while millions of Canadians don't have a family doctor.

This is unfair.

Restrict health benefits for failed asylum claimants to emergency lifesaving care.

Deport those with no legal reason to be in Canada.

[Dan Mazier @DanMazierMP]

BREAKING

The Parliamentary Budget Officer has revealed that nearly 74,000 REJECTED asylum claimants are entitled to deluxe health benefits through the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP).

Deluxe supplemental health benefits like vision care, home care, and physiotherapy now account for more than half of all IFHP costs.

These are benefits that Canadians who have paid into the system their entire lives can’t access.

Counselling costs have grown from less than 1% of supplementary spending in 2016 to 11% in 2025.

Last year alone, taxpayers paid $38.79 million for counselling and $12.41 million for home visits for asylum seekers under the program.

This damning information comes at a time when six million Canadians can’t access the basic service of a family doctor.

The PBO also revealed the average length of IFHP coverage for asylum claimants is now a staggering four years.

It is undeniable that as the backlog grows, rejected asylum claimants continue adding pressure to a health care system where Canadians are already facing long wait times for care.

The Liberals must explain to Canadians why asylum seekers whose refugee claims were rejected, face enforceable removal orders, and in some cases fail to appear for removal, continue to receive deluxe, taxpayer-funded health benefits while they avoid leaving Canada.

[Michelle Rempel Garner @MichelleRempel]

74,000 bogus asylum claimants are getting benefits like vision care while millions of Canadians don't have a family doctor.

This is unfair.

Restrict health benefits for failed asylum claimants to emergency lifesaving care.

Deport those with no legal reason to be in Canada.

[Brian Lilley @brianlilley]

Deport them all.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Michelle Rempel is calling for Immigration Minister Lena Diab to be fired by Thursday. She says Lena hasn’t shown up for work lately because she can’t answer the tough questions, calling her terrible.
I can’t argue with any of it.

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

Very good news!

I asked @PierrePoilievre what he plans to do as Prime Minister of Canada about the abuse of child transition.

He was more clear than he’s ever been in vowing to stop it!

[EmmCee @Freedom26088986]

@ShaunRickard67 @JackDan110 @donahugh216 I agree 💯

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

‼️BOOM - Poilievre ROCKS Punjabi reporter:

"The extortion suspects were first time offenders...."

Poilievre: "I dont care. Put them in jail for 10 years"

H/T: @AmazingZoltan

[Andrew Scheer @AndrewScheer]

🚨 UPDATE!!!

Mark Carney is ordering government lawyers NOT to defend your property rights in court.

Homeowners deserve certainty, not chaos and legal battles.

Conservatives are forcing a vote on Monday to protect your home ownership.

Watch this:

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION

1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day).

LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:**
- Cancers in remission
- Strong family history or genetic predisposition
- Prophylaxis (preventive)
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished.

MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9.

HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared.

VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers.
**Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days).
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported.

**Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):**
- Low: ≤30 mg/day
- Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid)
- High: 120 mg/day
- Very High: ≥150 mg/day

Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary.

Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only.

Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

COVID was the greatest propaganda campaign in history to make people believe there was a pandemic so virulent, with hospitals so overwhelmed they needed dancing nurses and doctors to convince people.

The worst part… it worked.

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

SHOCKING 😳

Andrew Coyne actually NAILS IT

Never thought I would see the day.

He is calling it exactly how it is. This entire thing STINKS