Everything wrong with the shape charge/explosion theory and how it fails every metric we see.
0/4
1. A singular audio event happened, one supersonic gunshot was fired that day, there is no escaping that.
2. Prolonged decorticate posturing happened | 5+ second duration before he was pulled down. Impossible with current explosion theory.
3. Trajectory - Not possible with the wound we see, breaks shirt concealment (char), jet visible.
4. Biomechanical Recoil and Energy Displacement - Body movement and energy displacement is nowhere close to an explosion.
There is not a single piece of evidence that fits with an explosion narrative.
How far are we going to move the goal post on this?
Again this is me arguing only the method that killed Charlie, not the narrative. The whole thing is sketchy as hell with a ton more people involved, but as of right now, the only thing that fits his death is a high velocity bullet.
You can’t make this shit up. How disconnected from your own theory do you have to be to post something that immediately debunks it.
First frame of impact, look how little movement there is on his right shoulder. And it’s going up, not backward.
Head - strong backward movement
Chin - strong down and inward movement to his chest
Right shoulder? - doesn’t move hardly at all.
The source location of the blast should have the heaviest amount of movement. Yet it has the littlest and in the wrong direction.
It is impossible to have practically zero movement in the source location but have massive amounts of movement elsewhere (head/chin).
Rookie work indeed, thanks Jon!
Because there is zero line of sight from his RODE mic to the spot where Charlie’s wound is without hitting the right side of his neck.
The reason the ballistic dummy looks like that is because it’s ballistic gel. It is one medium, a single density. It expands perfectly radially because it has to.
In a persons body there a ton of different densities, you have bone, tissue, muscle, tendon, veins, etc. Cavitation will take the path of least resistance. In an actual body it has numerous places to travel, it will not be perfectly circular. So it won’t be that massive ballooning you see
The cameras absolutely do not catch a single frame of the mic components mid flight striking his neck. Everything is behind the shirt. You are setting up the reasoning of his shirt raising/wound by making it be the internals of the shirt.
That is the same exact concept as you asking me show me the skin stretching outward from cavitation to prove that is what moved the pendant. Neither exists because nothing captured it. The difference is the physics/physiological components match cavitation and a high velocity round, not an explosion.
I thought the point of this post was pretty obvious, clearly a jab at you trying to obtain information that not a single person possess, just like your internals from your mic. It does not exist
@JoeySlaton98149@jonaaronbray I expected more from the explosion people. But damn, can’t even understand why a 30/60 fps video can’t capture a bullet traveling 800+ m/s? This is a lost cause..
@jonaaronbray Okay, so no frame showing debris in any of that, good to know, that’s a shame.
But hey good thing in that one screenshot you showed how even more impossible the trajectory is!
This guy actually thinks overlaying the image of the debris is proof of fact!
@Logicopa So. By your logic, we need to bypass over the physics of it being impossible. We can deduce that, because we see a shattered RODE mic in the SUV, it means it blew up.
That’s impressive. No wonder you are a doctor!
Can you show me the frame, just a single frame of your shrapnel crossing outside his shirt and flying into his neck?
You are asking proof for a phenomenon that is impossible to visibly see due to device restrictions. Cavitation expansion happens in under 5ms then collapses. No 30-60fps camera will ever catch that.
However there is ample evidence shown of the effects from expansion and definitely collapse phase all over his head/neck. None of that can be explained from a shape charge on his right shoulder.
You can’t ignore 50 different pieces of matching evidence that fits the profile of a high velocity bullet, then say nah, bullshit because not a single device had capabilities to record actual cavitation expansion. We saw the aftermath of expansion and collapse, but nahhh, I need that 5ms.
Explosion fails from start to finish.
Analysts put the charge sizes between 1.5-3g for the pagers.
It is impossible to even remotely compare these two scenarios. They aren’t even close. Charlie has ZERO rearward movement in his shoulder.
There is not a single shape charge in existence that achieves 0% radial leakage. Near-field pressures on the shirt just with radial leakage puts the kPa’s at hundreds of thousands at .5”. That will incinerate a shirt.
How do people eat this shit up without seeing the obviously flaws in it…
I mean… look at how hard he is trying to make the trajectory work and still can’t make it match.
- Why is the trajectory line on the outside of the shirt above the magnet where it would be visible for the world to see? (he’s even tugging on his shirt outward to try and make it fit past the Adam’s Apple)
-Why is he scrunching his shoulders so far forward? Charlie was literally sitting at rest with a tiny hunch in his back leaning forward. His shoulder line was sitting a tad behind his ears.
-The trajectory line is literally scraping his Adams apple.
-The wound on Charlie was less than an inch up and left of the peak of his Adam’s Apple. Not wherever the fuck he’s saying it is.
People, stop being retarded.
@NihiloX The external components of the RØDE transmitter turned into shrapnel from the explosion. The circuit board is caught in his shirt collar and the battery impacts his neck.
1. You will never see the bullet actually hit Charlie, unless the video is way higher fps.
2. Cavitation is the expansion and collapse (vacuum) of a temporary cavity produced by the hydrostatic shockwave from the bullet entering the body.
3. The expansion phase happens in under 5-10ms, highly highly unlikely we would ever capture that in a 30-60fps video. (We do capture aftermath expansion in some videos, ss attached).
4. Expansion causes the necklace to expand outward laterally, forcing the left side of his necklace outward, pulling on his pendant, shooting it upward and to the left. The launching and traveling happened within a single frame. Which is consistent with how fast cavitation happens.
5. That first frame on some videos we were catching the aftermath of expansion forcing the pendant upward and getting caught in his shirt.
6. After expansion phase is collapse phase which creates a vacuum in the temporary cavity pulling everything inward, most of the time closing the entrance wound.
So in summary
-bullet moving to fast to ever see it create the entrance wound
-expansion happens too fast to see the reaction of the necklace/pendant.
-some videos first frame we see is the pendant stuck in his shirt, which is 1000% plausible.
Just because you lack the critical thinking skills and the ability to do research, doesn’t mean everything is a psyop.
@ron_drouin Ohhh this one? The one where the it blew out the back of his bag, fabric/debris going everywhere and how the main movement of his body was directly where the source came from.
Yeah, this and Charlie’s are damn near identical, must of missed this one.
@Thomas2ross I’d expect more from a civil engineer. That’s unfortunate.
Not once did I mention a 30.06 or Tyler Robinson did it.
Didn’t know calling Jon out on his impossible trajectory was irrelevant minutia. Damn, may have to change course. I appreciate the sentiment
You don’t need access to the body to visual see that Charlie’s initial impact movements make it impossible for it to be an explosion.
I don’t need grok, access to the crime scene or the body. The explosion theory FAILS there, immediately, case closed based on physics alone.
- There is zero rearward movement on Charlie’s right shoulder, impossible if any explosive was placed where it said it was.
- In 1 frame, Charlie’s head snaps backward, chin inward to his chest, both shoulders upward and arms inward to his chest. 3 symmetrical movements in 3 different areas of his body.
Impossible for an explosive, they are asymmetrical, also the movement effects on the body happen over multiple frames, not just 1
I’m simply providing information, if you choose not to believe it, that’s on you, but you can’t ignore basic physics.
@ron_drouin Not disagreeing. But blindly following something that there is a mountain of evidence against, doesn’t help the cause either.
Also, I am trying to prove the official narrative, just the means of death and right now, everything is pointing towards a high velocity bullet.
Which part?
The fact that there is zero rearward movement in his right shoulder, which is impossible if an explosive was there.
Or
How an explosion can never be the source cause for immediate decorticate posturing?
Or
How an explosion can never create a symmetrical 1 frame snap on 3 different parts of the body? Head backwards, chin inwards, both shoulders up and arms inwards in 1 frame.
Or
How there’s not a single shape charge that produces 100% directional efficiency? There is always radial leakage, which means his shirt would be destroyed.
Take your pick, explosion fails 50 different ways. But it’s alright, keep thinking his outside the shirt trajectory line pointing to the wrong wound location is legit hahah.
@Texan4LibertyYo Try a new tactic, fuck Israel.
Want to actually apply some critical thinking and come up with a counter argument or did you just want to keep peddling that same low IQ garbage?
@jonaaronbray Adams Apple excuse? The hell are you talking about.
Lol, look at how far off your wound marker is. It’s hilarious and yet, the sheep stumble in.