andyville

Jesus is King.

[andyville @FreethinkerAOL]

@Bobtheanon @cumlasagna1 This is why we can’t have nice things

[George Alexopoulos @GPrime85]

There's no more accurate a metaphor for the West than slowly bleeding to death by the hand of barbarians while corrupt authorities tie our hands behind our back.

[Matthew Marsden @matthewdmarsden]

I grew up in the Uk.

Almost every Friday or Saturday night there was a fighting a pub. I have seen loads of them.

Not once did I see a knife pulled. In fact, you were considered a coward if you ever did.

This is an imported culture, and it has been allowed to fester like a cancer.

And like cancer, it will continue to grow until it kills its host, unless it is destroyed.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

For those mainly Pakistani men who have inflicted the very worst pain imaginable on innocent British children, please know this.

There will come a day when the power of the British state that concealed your atrocious crimes for so very long is turned against you.

It will be swift. It will be brutal. It will be severe.

Because if Restore Britain gets a sniff of power, there will be a reckoning. I promise you that.

We will show you the same mercy you showed our girls.

Your race or religion will not protect you any longer.

A message will be sent that is heard right across the world.

If you rape our children, you will pay for it - and you will pay for it with everything.

That is what Restore Britain will do.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Under a Restore Britain Government, the most monstrous Pakistani child rapists would not be deported.

With the British people's approval, they would be put to death.

In my view - if you rape and torture children, you do not deserve to live.

[David Scott Patterson @davidpattersonx]

All the arguments against giving women the vote were right.

It turned out even worse than feared.

Involving women in politics has harmed men, women, children, and civilization itself.

Power is ultimately held by those who are willing to take it by force.

Men were given the vote so that they would not need to take it by force.

Women are incapable of taking power by force and therefore have no natural right to power.

Women also have no natural instinct for leadership. Men evolved to provide leadership for both men and women.

Most suicidal empathy and demands for DEI and equity are the result of feminine influence on politics.

Empathy for criminals and terrorists, and opposition to the death penalty, is largely feminine.

The desire for safe spaces, censorship, and for elevating being nice over being rational is feminine.

The feminization of civilization is the weakening of civilization.

Giving women the vote was a mistake.

[Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins]

UK law:

If you are Muslim you can punch a police offer in the face, bang your first cousin and claim benefits for your fourth wife (also a family number)

If you are white, you get prison time for tweeting how pissed off you are about it.

Labour are inciting riots

[Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪 @PeterMcCormack]

Regarding youth unemployment…

Remove the minimum wage and employment rights for the young and you’ll see a wave of jobs created.

Why?
1. Low risk / low cost for the employer
2. Slap the entitled shit out of the youth

A good, hard working kid will start a career and do well.

An entitled lazy fuck will learn the harsh reality of life.

Suddenly unviable businesses become viable. Unemployment will fall. Welfare demands will drop.

It’s not hard if you engage your brain.

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

Galatians 4:4 looks like a transition verse.

“But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth His Son.”

If you read it fast, it sounds like a timestamp. But if read slowly, it is the most staggering sentence in the Bible.

‘Fullness of time’. Paul isn't saying God picked a convenient moment. He is saying God declared a moment complete. “The preparation is finished and everything I have been building across centuries is exactly where I need it to be”. God looked at human history and said: now.

Which forces the question. Why then? Why not a thousand years earlier, when Moses was fresh? Why not a thousand years later? What was so perfect about the first century?

I started looking into it and I have not recovered.

God needed a people with the theology. He spent 2000 years forming Israel; the covenant, the sacrificial system, the prophets, Isaiah 53 written seven centuries before Calvary, the framework of a coming Messiah who would bear the sin of the world. The Jews were shaped by wilderness, exile, and divine discipline, until the theological infrastructure for substitutionary atonement was fully in place.

But theology alone could not travel. God needed a language. Not a tribal dialect, but a universal tongue. So five hundred years before the Gospel, He let the Greek philosophers begin.

Heraclitus sat in Ephesus and concluded the universe was governed by an invisible rational principle. He called it the Logos.

The Stoics built on it. Philo of Alexandria stood at the intersection of Greek thought and Hebrew scripture and said the Logos was the mind of God in creation. For five hundred years, philosophy built a conceptual category it could not fill.

Then God sent a conqueror with no interest in theology. Alexander the Great wanted glory and empire. God let him want it. In satisfying his ego across three continents, Alexander Hellenized the ancient world and forged Koine Greek, the common tongue of the docks, markets, soldiers, and slaves. A language stripped of complexity, simple enough for anyone, universal enough for everyone.
The Hebrew scriptures were translated into it. The Septuagint was born. God used a pagan conqueror’s ambition to translate His own Word.

Then Rome came and paved the road. The Pax Romana. Piracy cleared. Stone highways stretching from Spain to Syria. A framework for movement the ancient world had never seen.

None of them knew they were collaborating.

Heraclitus thought he was doing philosophy. Alexander thought he was building a monument to himself. Rome thought it was building an empire for Rome. Not one of them understood they were stagehands. God was with Heraclitus in his pondering, with Alexander in his conquest, with Roman engineers laying stone, quietly requisitioning their work for a purpose none of them could see.

And then, when the covenant people were in place, the language primed, the roads built, and the category ready, when everything He had been quietly assembling was finally set, God stepped into the room they had unknowingly prepared.

John picked up his pen and wrote: “In the beginning was the Logos.”

Every Greek philosopher in the Mediterranean felt the ground shift. “And the Logos became flesh.” The category they spent five centuries constructing was not a principle. It was a Person.

The ‘fullness of time is not a timestamp’. It is God’s signature on a completed work. And the humbling thing is that this work was not built by saints. It was built by conquerors, philosophers, and emperors who thought they were writing their own story. God let them think that. And used every word. If this is not amazing then I don’t know what is.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I want to be really clear about what our aim is following yesterday’s historic victory.

Win the next general election, and I have never been more confident we are going to do exactly that.

What happening in Great Yarmouth was seismic.

Turnout soared. We brought thousands of people to the polling station who have never voted before. We got more votes in this local election than I received in the general election.

The implications of it all must not be underestimated.

Despite everything Reform threw at us, we decimated them in every single seat. Farage said we wouldn't win one percent. He was right. We won almost fifty.

The nine wards across Great Yarmouth are so varied. From Winterton in the rural north, to the urban centre of Great Yarmouth itself.

We won the nine seats, and the borough council by election, but within those wider seats we won every single ward by a mile.

If we can win in every one of those areas, we can win anywhere.

As I promised, we are going to give the British people a genuine alternative - we are going to provide an option to elect people from outside the rotten political establishment.

We did that in Great Yarmouth, and we delivered a landslide victory.

That was step one. Now, we go national.

Great Yarmouth First, then we Restore Britain.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

History made. We won ten out of ten seats, with overwhelming majorities in every single one.

Great Yarmouth First, then we Restore Britain.

A very special day.

[andyville @FreethinkerAOL]

@SurvivalInstint Absolute bollox. The defender can’t use the most effective strategy which is to punch the attacker hard in the face - because that ends the training session.

Attack is an integral part of defence and training without it is pointless

[Divinely Designed @DivinelyDesined]

Studies show that there is only 1 functional protein fold in 10^77 possible protein sequences - and that's for a short protein of only 150 amino acids (the building blocks that make up proteins).

To understand how truly incomprehensibly large that number is, think about this. It is estimated that there are roughly 10^80 atoms in the entire universe. So the odds of evolution finding a single functional protein would be like a blind man finding a single marked atom out of the entire universe.

It is also estimated that there have been a total of around 10^40 organisms that have lived in Earth's entire history - that includes everything from bacteria to humans. Which means there has only been 10^40 possible chances for life to find novel proteins.

Even if we grant that multiple mutation events can happen in each generation, we still only have 10^40 total trials to find a novel protein fold, with 1 in 10^77 chances - barely half of what's needed to find just one, let alone the 27k+ protein families. Multiple random mutations per generation do not multiply the number of trials - they just make most outcomes non-functional faster.

So even if we give evolution all the probabilistic resources possible in Earth's entire history, it's still barely half of what's needed for evolution to find one novel protein fold. But scientists have counted over 27k unique protein families across Life - that means unique protein folds with no evolutionary ancestry between each other.

This is important, because evolutionists claim that novel proteins form by evolution tinkering with previous proteins - but there is no evolutionary history shared between protein families. Scientists have even tried to force mutation in proteins, attempting to intelligently evolve one into another - and it fails every time. There is no pathway where one protein fold can be mutated into a novel fold without losing function.

And compounding that issue is the fact that proteins work together with other proteins.

For instance, ATP Synthase is a molecular machine made up of 29 total proteins from 10 different protein families. Every cell ever known requires ATP Synthase to produce energy to survive. Life cannot survive without it, which means random chemistry had to engineer 18 proteins from scratch and configure them together into a machine that creates energy gradients that can be used in the cell - which consequently requires more molecular machines to use and distribute that energy once it's been created, requiring even more proteins!

The math is clear.

Evolution cannot explain even one protein - but we're expected to believe it explains all the machinery in the cells we see?

Absurd.

Life was clearly Divinely Designed.

[andyville @FreethinkerAOL]

@EYakoby A mate of mine volunteers for Hatzola and I can assure you that they treat anyone who calls them regardless of faith or race.

And in case it matters: I'm an ethnic English Christian

[William M Briggs - Statistician to the Stars! @FamedCelebrity]

https://t.co/ouz6hs49nU

[andyville @FreethinkerAOL]

@iAmJoshHunt there is a fairly well known path to industrialisation / re-industrialisation:

1. Energy Infrastructure: gas, oil, and cheap power generation - this attracts all types of industry

2. Agriculture Automation (see netherlands)

3. light automotive -

[Moving Home with Charlie @moving_charlie]

This is the fact Boomers wont accept.

Boomers aren't responsible for house price rises, that's government policy.

But it's insufferable when they dismiss the complaints of younger generations that housing has become unaffordable.

[andyville @FreethinkerAOL]

@iAmJoshHunt Key Point:

"At the margin, UK housing is priced by what the next buyer can borrow. Mortgages clear at 4 to 4.5 times salary. Which means housing is a leveraged bet on British wages."

Do any of us really expect British wages to rise in near future?

[Josh Hunt @iAmJoshHunt]

There are two numbers that should be sitting on every UK policymaker's desk this year. They are not.

The first is £9.18 trillion. The total value of UK housing stock.

The second is 70%. The share of UK workers in occupations the IMF classifies as exposed to AI. Higher than the US. Higher than the advanced-economy average.

Both numbers are real. Both come from serious published research. Neither is talking to the other.

Start with what UK housing actually is. Not bricks. Not land. Not planning permission. At the margin, UK housing is priced by what the next buyer can borrow. Mortgages clear at 4 to 4.5 times salary. Which means housing is a leveraged bet on British wages.

Now look at what those wages are.

81% of UK GDP is services. 83% of UK employment is services. Law. Finance. Consulting. Admin. Media. Tech. Middle management. These aren't side categories. They are the British economy.

They are also the roles with the highest AI exposure.

Goldman Sachs ranks them at the top: legal, financial analysis, operations, content production. The IMF puts 70% of UK workers in AI-exposed occupations, against around 60% in the US.

Why is the UK so exposed? Because we deindustrialised faster and further than any G7 peer, and replaced factories with knowledge work. The UK has seen the steepest manufacturing decline of any G7 economy since 1970. Every policy decision for forty years pushed labour into exactly the categories now in the crosshairs.

Then we concentrated it geographically.

London and the South East hold over 40% of UK housing value on just 26% of the housing stock. Same regions. Same workers. Same wages. Same exposure. The financial concentration mirrors the labour concentration almost perfectly.

Then we leveraged it.

UK household debt: around £2 trillion. Of which mortgages: over £1.6 trillion. Debt-to-income ratio: 117.5%. Lloyds alone has a £317 billion mortgage book.

The British banking system is a direct bet on services wages staying intact.

Now run the scenario.

If AI compresses services wages 10% over a decade, it is not a 10% fall in house prices. It's larger, and it's at the margin, because leveraged buyers drop out first and the comparables reset downward. That's how housing markets actually clear.

And the UK has no hedge.

The US has manufacturing reshoring, CHIPS Act money, energy abundance, resource extraction. Blue-collar wages rising as white-collar gets squeezed. The UK has none of it. We deindustrialised, layered the economy onto services, and financed £9 trillion of housing against wages that are now the most AI-exposed in the G7.

The rebuttal is that AI boosts productivity. The OECD expects UK productivity growth of 0.4 to 1.2 percentage points a year from AI. Second only to the US in the G7.

But mortgages don't clear on aggregates. They clear on individual incomes.

And the aggregate hides who captures the gains. The IMF's own recent research finds AI-era wage gains concentrating at the high-skill and low-skill ends of the labour market. Middle-skilled workers don't share in them proportionately.

Middle-skilled knowledge workers are the exact population whose mortgages clear the UK housing market.

The blast radius goes well beyond house prices.

Buy-to-let yields break. Pension funds' bank equity revalues. The council tax base erodes. Treasury receipts soften. Bank capital gets stress-tested against a shock no model has priced.

Every major UK asset class is, in some form, long services wages.

And yet the silence is total.

Politicians can't say it. The median voter is a homeowner. Banks can't say it. Capital requirements. Pension trustees can't say it. Members' retirements depend on the number. The Treasury can't say it. Its own fiscal projections assume rising property-linked receipts forever.

The silence is structural, not accidental.

Britain didn't just bet the economy on services. We bet the balance sheet of every household on services wages surviving the most disruptive labour technology in a century.

Nobody chose that trade explicitly. But every mortgage written in the last twenty years locked it in.

The numbers in this post aren't mine. They come from the IMF, OECD, ONS, Savills, the Bank of England, NIESR, and the UK government's own January 2026 AI labour market assessment.

Most came from Whitehall.

Nobody in Whitehall is connecting them.

[Proudofus.uk @ProudofusUK]

Today is St George's Day. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Your patron saint wasn't English. Your flag wasn't English either.

Here's why we claimed them both. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

He was from Cappadocia. Modern Turkey.

A Roman soldier. The Praetorian Guard. Diocletian's personal bodyguard.

303 AD. The Emperor orders him to persecute Christians.

He refuses. Walks into the throne room. Tells the Emperor his order is cruel.

They offer him his life back. Gold. Land. His old command.

He refuses again.

23rd of April, 303. They behead him.

1,723 years ago today.

The flag was Genoese. 1099. Their navy was so feared that Barbary pirates turned home at the sight of it.

In 1190, Richard the Lionheart signed a treaty. English ships could fly the cross for protection.

We flew it so long we forgot it wasn't ours.

In 2018, the Mayor of Genoa wrote to the Queen asking for 247 years of back rent.

She didn't reply.

Edward III makes George our patron saint.

Henry V cries his name at Agincourt.

A Roman soldier from Cappadocia became the name Englishmen died for.

We didn't inherit our patron saint. We chose him. And we chose a soldier who refused.

That is your history.

This is who we are. 🇬🇧

We find what Britain has forgotten. And we tell it properly.

https://t.co/rih7iKwnvf

Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧