FriendlyGhostXL

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@ChibiReviews how do they even know thats him??? these findings are crazy.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@HeathensEstate @friedPeeP @DustyVampi1r @Arctic_Froze he can't admit that he made a terrible argument regarding sans, so he had to call me "dence" for not taking his BS of an argument.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@TheOnlyRogu3 @friedPeeP @DustyVampi1r @Arctic_Froze necrophilia isn't about consent, it's about attractions to dead people. but you're making double standard arguments by rejecting vampire lolis because of how they look, but not taking it to account on how sans looks.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@TheOnlyRogu3 @friedPeeP @DustyVampi1r @Arctic_Froze "u see, sans may look like a dead guy but hes actually alive"

thats literally the 9k year old vampire argument disgused as being alive.

if being alive despite looking like a skeleton
doesnt make it necrophilia then a 9k year old loli isnt pedophilia because she's of age.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@friedPeeP @DustyVampi1r @Arctic_Froze you've said it can't be necrophilia because it can't be replicated IRL. I've told you the flaw in that reasoning and how it justifies being attracted to child versions of sans, vampire lolis, ect.

because apparently being unreplicatable eliminates paraphilias.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@friedPeeP @DustyVampi1r @Arctic_Froze u run because u cant address the flaw in your reasoning of being attracted to sans not being necrophilia, liking sans seemed so normal for u, that u just HAVE to fight for it so it wouldn't justify lolicon. it's best for you to concede that it's a flaw in the reasoning you gave.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

https://t.co/vi9X8q4mgA
sir i draw traditionally, did you listen to a single thing i've said?

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Druox @TheDustyVamp1re anyways. here's art I drew, incase you think I use AI to "draw" Im just making a point here how people lie about how visuals work.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Druox @TheDustyVamp1re in otherwords, saying that single lines look better than ai art is disengenously bias because they hate ai. and thats not how appealing looking visuals work.

it's like saying "oh this art piece looks good"

"dude it's made by hitler"

"well then looks terrible"

blatent lying.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re well at least you took it the same. I thought me mispeaking caused something else to be interpreted here.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re who cares if it sounds bad? lol
sounding bad doesn't mean it is yo lol.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re so right now im going to expect you to give me a circular argument.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re 🔔 also, i've debunked your argument on
"not the same = not applicable to finding parts that are desireable on an art piece"

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re sounding bad doesn't mean it is lol.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re but if you feel that this is pedophilic, thats only on you buddy. this isn't an admission, because defending cartoon children, lolis, are a stance im already defending to not being pedophilic.

[FriendlyGhostXL @FriendlyGhostXL]

@Moon_Djinn115 @TheDustyVamp1re fixed version:
you're being overly technical with my argument here. it doesn't matter if mable is a cartoon kid or loli. the argument would literally be the same regardless, defending cartoon children and lolis are in the same ball park. the argument wouldn't be much different.