JustFries

保卫神棍的胡言乱语 大号：@Fries1919115｜Discord:

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

一些我觉得值得点进我主页的人看的东西（持续更新）：

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

近日以来看过的最傻逼的文章

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

这是想要取消中期选举的前奏吗？

[Ryan Haecker @RyanHaecker]

James Talarico goes full Eckhartian. @jamestalarico

He knows that the statement 'God is love' uses the name of 'God' as a noun. He is trying to say that, even in this sentence, the name of God has only the meaning of the verb 'is love', that is, of 'loving'.

Similarly, the 13/14th-Century German mystic and philosopher Meister Eckhart fiercely critiques the habit of treating the word "God" as a noun that refers to a static entity or an object out there in the world.

In Sermon 52, he instructs his listeners to pray to be "rid of God" as a conceptual noun:

"We pray to God that we may be rid of 'God', and that we may take the truth and enjoy eternity."

For Eckhart, treating God as a noun creates an idol in the mind. Rather, the formula that "God is love" (1 John 4:16) must be read to mean the active verb loving rather than a static description of the name of God.

Eckhart further analyzes "God is love" into four dynamic movements of attraction and flow, arguing that God’s essence cannot be separated from the continuous act of pouring Himself out into creation:

"'God is love.' That is so, inasmuch as all that can love, all that does love, he compels by his love to love him... Love happens, shows up naturally, when our mind is set aside for a while."

In his formal Latin works, such as the Prologues to the Opus Tripartitum, Eckhart argues for the coincidence of Being and Action in God. He notes that in Latin, God identifies Himself in Exodus 3:14 not with a formal title or noun, but with a verb:

Ego sum qui sum ("I am who I am").

Hence, for Eckhart, as for Talarico, God's "being" (esse) is identical to His "acting" (agere).

[Guilherme Gomes Santos @guilherme94jose]

Modernity is fundamentally Gnostic, not secular.

[Vatican News @VaticanNews]

"Truth is not a territory to be defended, but a good to be shared."

- Magnifica humanitas, 25

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@urplusss 其实主要是地狱观，我还是不配在法的问题上指手画脚的，所以我没有具体说我要采取什么立场，只是说我不会采取福音派奇艺搞笑的立场罢了

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

讲述恶在本体论的意义上是不存在的，而只是一种善的（神圣之光）的缺乏，既然如此，对恶的报复性刑罚也就成了问题，毕竟若恶并非真实存在的东西，那么对恶的问题的解决并非是通过罢逐、消灭、销毁就得以解决的，而必须通过善或神圣之光的照耀。

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@urplusss 其实是在讲汉传基督徒在伦理观上的内在不一致，不能一方面把恶视为善的缺乏又同时反对废死诸如此类的

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@Jyyyy0218 ?

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

https://t.co/mqLQ5Kzswd

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@sunyixian8

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

一些我觉得值得点进我主页的人看的东西（持续更新）：

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@sunyixian8

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@sunyixian8 约翰·卡普托《上帝的苦弱》

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@sunyixian8

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. In Jesus Christ, this humanity in its grandeur becomes the Way, the Truth and the Life, opening the path for each of us to grow toward fullness. #MagnificaHumanitas
https://t.co/6i9MWs6LJl

[Pope Crave @ClubConcrave]

"We must, then, avoid the 'Babel syndrome,' namely the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language — even a digital one — can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance."

[Christopher Hale @ChristopherHale]

In leaked audio recordings, Peter Thiel revealed he told JD Vance to ignore Pope Leo XIV on moral issues, including the development of ethical AI.

Calling Leo XIV the “woke American pope,” he also suggested the American pope was a tool of the Antichrist.

Now, Pope Leo XIV is releasing what’s expected to be an historic encyclical addressing AI tomorrow morning. https://t.co/i3RoHOhJQM

[Michael Haynes 🇻🇦 @MLJHaynes]

Pope Leo XIV writes that the Catholic teaching on Just War Theory “is now outdated”

“Today, more than ever, without prejudice to the right to self-defense in the strictest sense, it is important to reaffirm that the 'just war' theory, which has all too often been used to justify any kind of war, is now outdated.”

Details on @PelicanCatholic

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

@MizukiWorkshop 之前病毒学要做一个project，我多查一点细节就立马标红说这是生物安全敏感信息…

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

当然：加尔文滚粗

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

虽然我喜欢今天教宗的牧养，但是我实在的忍受不了今天的天主教徒。如果说新教徒多出maga的话，天主教徒就多出groypers（见Nick Fuentes）
重点在于，如果他们常说路德误解了天主教教义，那么在他们对路德的批判��也同样误解了信义宗教义，而这一点是背离于梵二后的圣座立场的（见JDDJ、“福音见证人”）

[JustFries @Fries_Alt]

但对新教徒和教会的一般批判是瓦解不了新教的神学的，反之同理