@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death I know this is probably futile, but I genuinely hope you start educating yourself and become an actual human being, American.
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death Üngör, Uğur Ümit. “Studying Mass Violence: Pitfalls, Problems, and Promises.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 7, no. 1 (April 1, 2012)
Van Krieken, Robert. “Rethinking Cultural Genocide: Aboriginal Child Removal and Settler‐Colonial State Formation.” Oceania75 (December 1, 2004)
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death Yeah no shit, of the entire population that died during that time, which we were talking about. It's incredible that I need to clarify this lmfao
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death I mean, yeah? I'm not saying mass murder isn't bad, you just can't always classify it specifically as genocide, obviously.
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death You can't just not include my other arguments and then say "this is your only argument", yet another strawman lmao. My "emotional" expression to say it's a big amount does not detract from the merits of the arguments lol.
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death An act of genocide as part of a larger genocide, yes. The murder of those Englishmen would have been an act of genocide too, had it been part of a genocide. I don't see how this very simple definitional logic isn't getting through
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death No, it's not? I have been trying to get through your thick skull that genocide is a holistic process and that not a single factor makes something a genocide. A single factor being ipso facto proof of a genocide is the exact opposite of my argument.
@kool79165@3SKATOLOGY@twink_death Yeah, it is. By your uninformed logic you can contribute genocide to any mass casualty battle in history, which is just characteristically ahoristical.