EBI

“ the story of the human race is the story of men and women selling themselves short “ - Abraham Maslow

[EBI @Frosso747]

"Michael did with music what they later did in sports and in politics and in television. And no controversy will erase the historic impact."- Rev. Al Sharpton

[EBI @Frosso747]

@RebelDiamond_ @paulgirl861 When a docu is made up of pro prosecution, produced by the same person who manipulated & heavily edited “ living with Michael “ docu by Martin Bashir you know it cannot be trusted. If MJ side was ever told you wouldn’t believe it anyway, you would say his estate lied.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@RebelDiamond_ @paulgirl861 No it’s no surprise, we the fans & advocates expected something like this. They always do this. 1 sided unbalanced docs. You just watched a docu on Netflix & that’s it. Well it’s not. MJ life including the allegations cannot be put in 1 docu or movie. You need a docu series.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@jay_quake @SusieJohn3311 @TheMJAP What more offending books were found? The man was heavily investigated had tons of books & those 2 books is what you got in your guilty feels over.
No we don’t defend him bc he is an artist because facts, the evidence proves he was extorted by all of them. Do your research

[Justice for The Falsely Accused @JuliaBerkowitz1]

@ElishaWill92 I have researched that case for 2 decades. The Arvizo case is genuinely insane and if that doc makes you believe it, then they must have done a LOT of twisting, omission and manipulation. I'm just going to leave it here:

https://t.co/QASU6YuVht

[EBI @Frosso747]

@visionary_uce They were never fans to begin with.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@VincentFAmen You didn’t come toe to toe with anyone. There was no sexual abuse ever committed by MJ. Court transcripts don’t lie, the Arvizos did. Along with the others. This is fact.

https://t.co/pLZT1yKlKV

[EBI @Frosso747]

@Adamns6r @MarianaR @svtppyopuli So what. Get over yourselves with the sleepovers. Us fans never den anything however MJ side of the story had been denied time and time again. Go and put your energy to the Epstein & Weinsteins of the world & leave innocent MJ alone.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@GiorgioTardio2 Oops he stepped into that.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@johnkim77 One documentary cannot cover the MJ trial. It requires to be a series.

It was pro prosecution, the same guy that produced it is the same guy the heavily edited Living with Michael which landed him in court.

Please read up, there is so much to learn about the allegations.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@johnkim77 You know if any child porn was found MJ would be arrested. It’s a crime. They were hunting MJ for years & couldn’t find anything incriminating. Porn was heterosexual & the 2 books was sent by fans, available to the public & in congress library.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@gadinhoTOGO @MarcusDiaTv2 The magazines were not porn or illegal. Available to the public and in the congress library. MJ has thousands of books, his computers and hard drives found zero evidence of anything illegal. Unfortunately for you you thought this was a flex.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@thefinalOracle This means nothing.

[EBI @Frosso747]

I just can’t sometimes. This world is evil. People do anything 2satisfy their egos, pockets, sexual desire, 2 get ahead, 2B the first, 2B the biggest, 2B right & they will do anything 2 get there.

Then slander & the injustices that have inflicted on MJ is 💔

#MJInnocent

[EBI @Frosso747]

This is a fantastic thread.

Diane Dimond is seriously a horrible person.

#MJInnocent

[Pablo Rodríguez Lago 🇪🇦 @fei_rock]

Cualquier documental que presente a Diane Dimond como fuente fiable para establecer un veredicto sobre el caso de Michael Jackson, carece de rigor informativo honesto y muestra una clara intención de engañar al espectador desde el primer momento.
🧵HILO 🧵

[EBI @Frosso747]

#MJInnocent

SquareOne great documentary backed up with receipts. Great for anyone who wants to learn how it all started.

[#MJINNOCENT @MJInnocentUK]

Watch #SquareOne as many times as possible from 3rd-13th June. Show Netflix that every Verdict deserves the full story. Every view counts so please watch on repeat! #MJInnocent #cancelnetflix #primevsnetflix @PrimeVideo @michaeljackson

[Dr. Andrew Greene @AndrewGreene864]

There is only ONE true story about Michael Jackson’s 2005 trial and everything leading up to it. Let me lay it out for you from start to finish.

It begins in June 2000. Gavin Arvizo is in the hospital fighting cancer. Michael Jackson hears about him and calls him. Just a call to lift a sick child’s spirits. They meet in person for the first time in August 2000. By October, Michael gives the family a van. They visit Neverland, but MJ isn’t even there. After that? Almost no contact for two full years. Then, in September 2002, Martin Bashir asks for the Arvizos to be part of his documentary. That’s what brings them back in.

February 2003: Living with Michael Jackson airs, deceptively edited to paint a monster. Michael and his team are forced into defense mode against the fallout. From that moment on? All hell breaks loose. And eventually, you get the 2005 trial.

But here’s what the media won’t tell you: The Arvizos’ allegations are some of the weakest, most absurd claims to ever enter a courtroom as a criminal case. Before we even get to the absurdities, remember: The Arvizos had a HISTORY of false sex abuse allegations. The JC Penney extortion case. Allegations against David Arvizo. They also targeted celebrities like Chris Tucker, George Lopez, and Verne Watson for money and favors.

Their timeline makes absolutely no sense. The prosecution changed it multiple times after realizing their original story was indefensible. Most people still believe MJ molested Gavin BEFORE the Bashir interview. But Gavin himself alleged it started AFTER the documentary aired. Let that sink in. Why would Michael Jackson,knowing he was under investigation, with the entire world on high alert, decide to start abusing a child at that exact moment? That bullshit actually made it into a courtroom.

And the “false imprisonment” claim? Complete fiction. The Arvizos went to multiple places during their so-called imprisonment. Not once did they try to call for help. Even worse: After “escaping” twice, with the help of MJ’s own employees, they WILLINGLY went back to Neverland. Make it make sense. Please. The “abduction” story fell apart when Chris Tucker testified: The Arvizos asked HIM to take them to Florida. They went willingly. Michael didn’t organize any of it.

Tom Mesereau proved the mom and siblings were all in on it. His cross-examination of Star Arvizo was a masterpiece. Mesereau handed Star a straight adult magazine, dated AFTER the last alleged abuse. “Is this the magazine Mr. Jackson showed you?” Star said yes. Game over. The media was NOT reporting on the courtroom massacre, most outlets buried it. Mesereau picked apart EVERY single “witness.”

MJ’s 2003 indictment had almost nothing to do with the Arvizos or the prosecution’s garbage case. The ONLY reason the grand jury indicted Michael Jackson was a decade of sensationalism, folklore, and misinformation. They were already convinced he paid hush money in the 90s, so they assumed guilt, even though the legal settlement never prevented the Chandler’s from pursuing a criminal trial.

During cross-examination, Mesereau asked Janet Arvizo: “Did you start investigating Michael through lawyers as early as January 1, 2000, before you even met him?” Janet never gave a clear answer. She rambled. The judge ordered her to respond. Even then? No direct answer. Mesereau told the court he didn’t believe he’d received an answer, but moved on. The judge let it go. But the question lingers: Why couldn’t she answer? If she had nothing to hide, why not just say yes or no? What was the motive? Some say: she wanted money, gifts, favors, or false allegations. Others say: poor wording in a report. But here’s what’s undeniable: Janet Arvizo had credibility issues from day one. And one thing was always at the center of this family’s efforts: money.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@biggussalamus Mummy issues

[EBI @Frosso747]

@AaronJFentress @MJInnocentUK @G33kyMick Aaron it’s so refreshing to read a post from an educated person such as yourself.

[EBI @Frosso747]

@Adlee7873 @Zigmanfreud yes 👍 😂

[EBI @Frosso747]

@nicoleboojie The producer of the this docu was the same who got Michael Jackson in trouble in the first place due to his lack of integrity. 2nd docu that has been manipulated, heavily edited & defence side not told. Gavin & his family were proven liars on the stand dis they show that part?

[EBI @Frosso747]

@sirguygadbois @NolteNC Michael Jackson harmed no child. All of the accusers &families used & abused MJ for money. They lied. Like the media, like Leaving Neverland, Living with Michael. They were all monsters. MJ was a kind man. If you don’t believe in his innocence u haven’t researched the facts.