I’ve noticed that my friends who are already TT professors/on track to be tend to have pretty “lowbrow” habits, as in watch reality TV and play Nintendo and don’t read many novels, while my friends with good taste are largely half-employed and cursed to wander the earth
whenever the female enters political propaganda as a figure she must always be erotiziced and she must be a slut, a succubus, a sexy seductress. no humanity is given to her.
it’s this idea that awful/morally disgusting people also must be ugly, unappealing, unskilled, anything undesirable or considered negative by social acceptability norms. and by extension to maintain your "goodness" you must suddenly see all their work as terrible, them as ugly, +
twitteo esto mientras leo literatura feminista y me agacho para pasar por la puerta pq mido 1.90 y de paso acaricio a mi gato con mis manos venosas de guitarrista
I’m sure that the only 3 dragons alive being bonded to a woman called “breaker of chains” who has bonded with one only by using a whip after dragons were effectively enslaved by Valyrians for centuries is totally something George wrote “just because”. no particular meaning
pensando en ese poema de Alfonsina Storni que dice “te amo porque no te pareces a nadie / porque eres orgulloso como yo / y porque antes de amarme me ofendiste”
Exactly, people who have no power have children so they can reign over their household, Foucault breaks down the necessity for the traditional family unit as a system of control. If every man gets to be the “king” in his home he won’t bother to enter competition w his oppressor
final act of love is an oxymoron, if you were a real lover there would be no final act- your love would demand unconditional devotion and compell you because continuity is in its nature