@knifewoman6@SparrowLuvs@melosomatic@sing0340@samcanmiss Not only that, they didn’t even go into detail. You are guessing purely off one comment. Unless you’re their doctor you shouldn’t be telling them they don’t have the disorder.
@phobiaAUx@HuntressSellia I would agree but it’s not really meant to JUST be a label if it’s meant to be a whole new sexuality. I think having a term or name for it wouldn’t exactly be as bad if it weren’t for that aspect? Again, I’m really not looking deep if this is obvious on the surface level.
@phobiaAUx@HuntressSellia Yes it does, because the only point of it is to focus on what is excluded. Any other normal person would just out right say they rather not date someone who is transgender.
@phobiaAUx@HuntressSellia It’s not a bias if it’s the truth. There is ALREADY a label to say you are attracted to the other gender … “super straight” is only focusing on who you aren’t attracted to compared to the label straight. How slow do I gotta say it for you to catch the hint?
@phobiaAUx@HuntressSellia No YOU Are dumb. Straight is already a sexuality, Super straight is just a made up title to EXCLUDE transgender individuals. Straight is already includes biological at birth gendered people, super straight just excludes that.
@phobiaAUx@HuntressSellia No… it’s still preference…and still not a sexuality. Demi sexual isn’t excluding a group of people, “super straight” is. It’s not focusing on who they are attracted to, it’s focused on who they aren’t.