Evandro Almeida

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

Quando vamos parar?

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@vitorsergio @Matheuscvm10 Ok
Tudo bem
A tecnologia é importante
Porém, junta à tecnologia, tem que vir a transparência.
Tem que ser mais transparente essas decisões pautadas pela tecnologia, porque quem calibra essas tecnologias ali de dentro? Não se sabe
Quem fiscaliza o fiscal?

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@vitorsergio @Matheuscvm10 Ele mostrou mais incerteza do que certeza
"Acho"
"Não estou seguro de haver tocado ou não"
Como eu disse, o cérebro pode simular a sensação de tocar em algo que buscamos muito tocar
O que ele sentiu foi mais a simulação que cérebro criou

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@vitorsergio Infelizmente não é bem assim
Vsr
Leia
O que ele disse
A bola não toca nele de fato
O que ele sentiu foi a simulação que o cérebro criou, já que Ele buscou tocar na bola e por pouco quase toca.
Mas as imagens mostram que NÃO, que NÃO A BOLA NÃO TOCA

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@fifamedia @adidasfootball @FIFAWorldCup Leia

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@GibaPerez Leia

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@PallottaPedro Leia

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Shane Breslin @shhhbreslin]

A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.

Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.

He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.

This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.

But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.

IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!

Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.

But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).

Snicko shows one?

They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.

That would remove all doubt.

The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@PallottaPedro Que na imagem não*

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@PallottaPedro Isso é um problema
Porque vê que houve um toque, mas não vê o que tocou
E por inferência, diz-se que foi o jogador da Croácia, que não imagem não mostra

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@NewsLiberdade E o Brasil não seria penta, a Alemanha não seria campeã em 2014

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@Fernanda_CidL Está errado em tudo

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@Poder360 O que há de mais abjeto no Bolsonarismo é a vaidade, a arrogância, altivez
Prepotência
Não há segurança no que se acredita
Mas a ansiedade de querer atropelar todos

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@Poder360 É pior não por causa delas, mas pela postura inadequada do Jair Bolsonaro.
A antipatia que as mulheres tem com o Bolsonarismo nasceu do Bolsonaro e não pela suposta ineficiência do PL mulher.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@peterjordan É real

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@NewsLiberdade Cadê o "grave" no título?

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@OficialSala12 Por ser um campeonato de menor expressão, vc não pode dizer que não é título e não computar
É título é pronto
Simples assim
A confederação de futebol daquele país diz que é título e não o que vc acha.

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@OficialSala12

[Evandro Almeida @GAMAIBANEZ]

@ghk32_ @FIGHTZINCLUB O problema é o juiz
Não a Argentina
Se eu quiser listar o números de erros de juiz a favor do Brasil, vai ficar grande
Mas não acho que foi de propósito
É só erro mesmo do juiz
O erro não escolhe inimigo, ele é democrático
Acontece pra todos