G.H.W. Stewart

PhD candidate in evolutionary meta-ethics, Lover of irony, animals, P v ~P🖖, and the Oxford comma. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@BOURNYBOY76 "Super... Army... Soldiers..."

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@benonwine

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@Keir_Starmer

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AmericaRecharge My work, by the way. Not AI.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AmericaRecharge

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@larayapmaaq Springbar.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@elonmusk this is NOT the answer from Grok that I expected. It failed to understand the trolley problem multiple times. Might be worth checking why and making sure it can’t do this.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@JamesMelville Soft men make me hard, hard men make me soft…strong men make me hard again…the quote goes something like this…but I can’t remember exactly…

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@basilthegreat This post is misleading.
The migrant was legal, and a woman, and in France.
Actual story: https://t.co/mxnYv0z4Gf

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

Currently running a social experiment: I’ve set this as my wallpaper and am counting the number of people who get suspicious around me. So far it’s been one per day.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@dubslife1 Can we allow people to kill people because they're angry with them? No. Does this man need to face criminal action? Yes. Can we understand wanting to destroy the knife carrying scum? Yes. Is this an overreaction? Yes. Is it a good thing if criminals fear this? Yes.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AleMartnezR1 Likewise, if everything that can be experienced physically is material, then if not experienced physically, then not material, is false.

For your argument to work, you’d need a premise that said that if x can’t be experienced physically then it isn’t material.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AleMartnezR1 Hello again NT. long time no see.
The logical flaw in this argument, is that you claim that what CAN be experienced physically is material, but that doesn’t mean that what cannot be experienced physically is not material. Eg, all xs are ys, therefore if not x then not y is false

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@havanar0seliu I really hope this is an intentional trojan horse post.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@XcitingTimes @TheNorfolkLion Not sure that fear is the right emotion to inspire in the public.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@TheNorfolkLion What would be an appropriate realistic workable way to bond with the community? When one is critical of X, one should have in mind something better. What’s your alternative?

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@justin_garson do you see any inherent problems combining relational accounts of function like Walsh’s with causal role accounts like Craver’s?

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@Locati0ns Nope

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AleMartnezR1 Ok. So there exist ideas that are about logically necessary things. But that doesn’t sound like the ideas being had by anyone is logically necessary. Just that the contingent ideas regard things that are necessary. But the ideas being had sounds like it’s still contingent.

[G.H.W. Stewart @GHWStewart]

@AleMartnezR1 Hmm. Ok. Let me comeback to you.