@Zel_Dio0 لاحظت انه في كل تغريدة أجدك تنتقد بها شيئا مع ان إنتقادك لا يغني و لا يسمن من جوع سوى أنه يثير الجدل لا غير
حاول ان تستمع بما تقرأه او تشاهده
و لو أردت الإنتقاد فحاول أن تكون أكثر دقة في إنتقادك
@AlzidiAmar@m432c1@vzlkio @Cule10LM لكن نهايته لم تكن أفضل شيئ على الأقل لو مات مرة واحدة كان ممكن تكون نهاية مناسبة لكن يموت لـ ما لا نهاية هذا مهين لكبريائه
@STSCBA_7 The comparison is misleading. Each prophet received revelation suited to their mission. Muhammad received continuous, intense revelation for 23 years, causing strong physical reactions; differences in method do not invalidate the message.
@STSCBA_7 These descriptions reflect the intensity of revelation, not pathology. Physical reactions—trembling, fainting, or color changes—are natural responses to extreme stress or overwhelming experiences. They do not indicate insanity or divine messages being false.
@STSCBA_7 This is a misunderstanding. The Qur’an and Hadith describe revelation as sometimes physically overwhelming, but this does not mean the Prophet attempted suicide; it was simply a physical effect of receiving divine messages.
@STSCBA_7 The Qur’an mandates prayer and defines its basics, while the step-by-step details come from the Prophet (Sunnah); this records the Qur’an’s practice, not an invention.
@STSCBA_7 As for comparing this to “demons,” that’s just speculation, not evidence. By that logic, any religious revelation could be dismissed the same way, which isn’t a real argument but an assumption without proof.
@STSCBA_7 The Qur’an doesn’t present revelation as casual “conversation.” It explains that God communicates with humans through revelation, from behind a veil, or via a messenger like Gabriel—so expecting direct dialogue misses how the text itself describes it.
@STSCBA_7 As for the claim about killing children “under his command,” that is false. There are explicit reports prohibiting the killing of non-combatants, including children and women. Violations by individuals don’t represent the teachings, and attributing them to him is inaccurate.
@STSCBA_7 Calling them all “bloody wars” is still misleading. Many expeditions had no fighting at all, and even major battles were limited in scale. Reducing everything to “slaughter” ignores historical distinctions and exaggerates what actually happened.
@STSCBA_7 As for your claim that Muhammad “never spoke to God,” that’s inaccurate. Revelation came through Gabriel, which is stated, but that doesn’t deny the connection to God—it explains how revelation was delivered. This is standard in Abrahamic traditions.
@STSCBA_7 That’s not accurate. Fighting in early Islam was not because people simply “rejected the message,” but because of real persecution, expulsion, and continued attacks. If disbelief alone was the reason, then all non-Muslims would have been fought—which clearly didn’t happen.