“Hamilton has come back strongly. Were you expecting him to be this competitive?”
Fred Vasseur: “Last year I underestimated just how significant the move from the Mercedes world to the Ferrari world would be. Everything was new for him, and Lewis isn’t one of those drivers who changes teams every two or three years, like Sainz. Now he knows the tools, the people and the way we work. With the good results, he’s also entered a positive momentum.”
TREMENDO MENSAJE 🫶🏼🇲🇽
“La próxima copa del mundo se juega en Marruecos, el pueblo marroquí le devolverá a los fans mexicanos lo que nos dieron hoy”DT Marruecos, Mohamed Ouahbi
📹 @RickyOlivaresV
He buscado el último caso de piloto que se lleva la pole pese a pasar por bandera amarilla: fue Max Verstappen en Imola, 2022.
Verstappen redujo a un máximo de 57km/h más lento que en su vuelta anterior. Ayer, la reducción de Russell fue, máximo, de 14km/h.
🇦🇷🇩🇿 A lot of people are saying Messi should’ve seen a red card 🟥 here, but if you really take a closer look at the situation, analyze his body position, consider the angle of his foot, factor in the movement of the Algerian player, take the emotional context of the match into account and seriously ask yourself why Messi’s foot ends up exactly there…
you’ll come to the only logical conclusion:
That is absolutely a red card.
JAJA
La doble moral de la FIFA es increíble . Te arman campañas contra la piratería porque "atenta contra las finanzas del fútbol", pero cuando ellos necesitan staff, le piden a los gobiernos miles de voluntarios. Trabajo regalado, sin sueldo, para un torneo que factura miles de millones de dólares.
O sea, si tú te ahorras unos pesos con un stream “alternativo”, eres un criminal; pero si ellos se ahorran millones en nómina usando mano de obra gratis, es "pasión por el deporte". El descaro se cuenta solo. Definitivamente, Infantino mató al fútbol
THIS IS INSANE!!!🤯
China just made it ILLEGAL to fire a human worker and replace them with AI.. and the way they found out is insane..
a quality assurance supervisor named Zhou worked at an AI company in Hangzhou.. his job was verifying AI-generated content.. matching user queries with model outputs.. filtering hallucinations and illegal content..
he was literally training the AI to do his own job..
once the model got good enough.. the company told him they were moving him to a lower position.. with a 40% pay cut.. from 25,000 yuan to 15,000..
he refused.. they fired him..
he sued.. and won..
the Hangzhou court ruled that replacing a human with AI is not a valid reason to fire someone.. period..
their logic.. adopting AI is a voluntary business decision.. not an earthquake.. not a government shutdown.. not a force majeure event.. it's a choice the company made to save money..
and because it's a choice.. the company has to absorb the cost of that transition.. not dump it on the worker..
this wasn't a one-off ruling either..
in Beijing.. a map data collector named Liu spent over a decade manually collecting geographic data.. the company switched to AI-automated data collection.. eliminated his entire department.. fired him..
he sued.. won.. exact same reasoning.. AI adoption is a proactive business strategy.. not an unforeseeable external shock..
and here's what's happening in the background that makes these rulings so urgent..
unemployment for chinese workers aged 25 to 29 just hit a record 7.7%.. the highest since they started tracking that age group separately..
companies across china are literally forcing employees to document their daily workflows so AI models can learn to replace them.. workers are training their own replacements and they know it..
a 24-year-old engineer built an open-source tool called "Colleague.Skill" that scrapes your work chat history, emails, code commits, and documents.. and creates a digital clone of you that can do your exact job after you're gone..
he meant it as a dark joke.. it got 13,400 stars on GitHub in three weeks.. top 0.1% of all projects globally.. because it wasn't really a joke.. it was exactly what companies were already doing to their employees..
workers in Shanghai and Beijing told MIT Technology Review that management was actively coercing them to document everything specifically to train AI replacements..
china's response.. make it illegal..
the State Council launched the "AI Plus" initiative.. a ten-year plan that explicitly mandates AI must augment workers.. not replace them.. companies must use AI to upgrade existing roles.. not eliminate them..
by 2027.. smart devices and AI agents must reach 70% penetration.. by 2030.. over 90%.. but the growth has to create jobs.. not destroy them..
now compare this to the US..
in america.. at-will employment means your company can fire you and replace you with AI tomorrow.. no warning.. no severance negotiation.. no retraining obligation.. as long as they're not discriminating based on race, age, or disability.. it's perfectly legal..
there is no federal law protecting american workers from AI displacement.. none..
california proposed a bill requiring just 30 days notice before deploying AI that affects employment.. that's the most aggressive protection any US state has attempted..
china made it illegal to fire you.. america doesn't even require a heads up..
and here's the irony nobody is talking about..
china.. the country the west accuses of having no worker protections.. just gave its workers more protection from AI than any democracy on earth..
the question isn't whether AI will replace jobs..
it's whether your country will protect you when it does.
Scam Altman and Greg Stockman stole a charity. Full stop.
Greg got tens of billions of stock for himself and Scam got dozens of OpenAI side deals with a piece of the action for himself, Y Combinator style. After this lawsuit, Scam will also be awarded tens of billions in stock directly.
The fundamental question is simply this:
Do you want to set legal precedent in the United States that it is ok to loot a charity? If so, you undermine all charitable giving in the United States forever.
I could have started OpenAI as a for-profit corporation. Instead, I started it, funded it, recruited critical talent and taught them everything I know about how to make a startup successful FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD.
Then they stole the charity.
Interesting how it works
Elon puts up his own money, rounds up the absolute best AI talent on the planet, leverages every connection he has to secure serious resources, and launches OpenAI in 2015 as a pure non-profit explicitly created to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, with zero profit motive and open research
Then the “team” decides they want the bag
They push Elon out, take control, and quietly flip the entire thing into a for-profit machine
All while preaching the same sanctimonious lines on repeat: “We’re still mission-driven!” “AI for the good of humanity!” “We’d never abandon our principles!”
The ultimate betrayal:
Elon got zero equity. Not a single share. He funded it. He built the foundation. He got nothing while they turned his non-profit into their personal cash cow
This is the level of betrayal and hypocrisy we’re dealing with
And for the record.... this lawsuit doesn’t put a single penny in Elon’s pocket. Any win goes straight back to the non-profit to restore the exact mission he founded
#Coachella se convirtió en lo que juraba destruir 🏜️🔥
Así es… el Coachella empezó como un boicot anti-precios altos y hoy justamente es todo lo contrario.
🎟️ En 1993 Pearl Jam decidió enfrentarse a Ticketmaster por sus comisiones excesivas. La banda se salió del sistema y organizó su propio concierto en medio del desierto, en Indio, California. 25 mil personas llegaron y demostraron que sí se podía hacer música sin depender de los grandes corporativos.
🎸 Años después, en 1999, Paul Tollett y Rick Van Santen retomaron la idea y lanzaron el primer Coachella. Era un festival alternativo, que hasta terminó perdiendo dinero, pero las entradas eran super accesibles y tenía un espíritu completamente anti-comercial.
Pero con el tiempo el capitalismo hizo lo suyo. El festival creció, llegaron los patrocinadores, los headliners y los precios cada vez más absurdos. Así fue como lo que nació como una protesta contra el sistema terminó convirtiéndose en uno de los eventos más caros, exclusivos y corporativos del mundo. Literalmente, lo mismo que quería combatir.
Y hoy Coachella solo son outfits, marcas, fotos e influencers haciendo contenido.
CL
KM
🤯BREAKING: Researchers just mathematically proved that AI layoffs will collapse the economy: and every CEO already knows it.
The AI Layoff Trap. A game theory paper from UPenn + Boston University is glaringly important!
100K+ tech layoffs in 2025. 80% of US workers exposed. And no market force can stop it.
→ Every company fires workers to cut costs
→ Every fired worker stops buying products
→ Revenue collapses across every sector
→ The companies that fired everyone go bankrupt
It's a Prisoner's Dilemma with math behind it. Automate and you survive short-term. Don't automate and your competitor kills you. But everyone automating destroys the demand that makes all companies viable.
UBI (universal basic income) won't fix it.
Profit taxes won't fix it.
The researchers found only one solution: a Pigouvian automation tax "robot tax"
The AI trap on the economy is here!
The number that should terrify every Western automaker is 1,500 kW.
BYD's Flash Charging pushes 1,500 kilowatts into a car battery. The fastest charger you can find in the US today maxes out at 350 kW. ChargePoint is bragging about rolling out 600 kW chargers sometime in 2026. BYD is already at 2.5x that. Deployed. 5,000 stations live. 20,000 planned by December.
The car in this video, the Song Ultra, starts at $22,000. Five minutes of charging gets you 250 miles of range. The fastest-charging EV you can buy in America is the Lucid Gravity at 400 kW, and it starts at $80,000.
So BYD is charging 4x faster at one-quarter the price. And Geely just beat them last week with a 4-minute charge. The Chinese automakers aren't competing with each other on range or styling anymore. They're in a charging speed war that Western companies haven't even entered.
BMW's response was literally "pursuing quick charging forces other compromises." That's the "640K ought to be enough for anybody" of the EV era.
Imagine closing your entire consumer memory division because this guy signed a non binding letter that he would buy 40% of the world’s RAM.
Only to have him rug pull 3 months later.