Healthcare stop limiting gender treatment approaches. Education & Healthcare systems must provide balanced, factual information & address dire impacts on family
FAO all who support the UK puberty blockers trial:
'They ruined my life. They shaped and folded my body according to what they thought would look the best... You can't treat kids like that. We're not your art project.'
-- detransitioner Jonni Skinner
https://t.co/DlTYUfzi5H
Two versions of reality at the same Senate hearing:
Chloe Cole: Minors cannot consent to irreversible medical transition. It harms their bodies.
Shannon Minter: It’s safe, medically supported, and the government should stay out.
Which one matches what we’re seeing in the real world?
#NoChildIsBornInTheWrongBody
You mean men, men who claim to be women. You are a national broadcaster that consistently obfuscates facts around sex because you’ve taken an ideological position the public overwhelmingly rejects. This isn’t news, it’s propaganda.
Skandale avslørt: Tre ledende trans-forskere i Norge felt for grov vitenskapelig uredelighet.
Norske forskere ved Nasjonal behandlingstjeneste for kjønnsinkongruens har i årevis manipulert studier på barn og unge som får kjønnsbekreftende behandling – uten samtykke fra pasientene eller godkjenning fra etikkutvalget.
Redelighetsutvalget ved Oslo universitetssykehus slår nå fast at de har begått alvorlige brudd på forskningsetiske normer. To artikler er klassifisert som ren vitenskapelig uredelighet.
Mens aktivister og medier har brukt disse studiene til å presse frem raskere og mer radikal «bekreftende omsorg», viser det seg nå at grunnlaget var juks og etikkbrudd.
Hvor mange barn har blitt skadet på grunn av denne forskningen?
WTF!: Today I drove into a private Khalistan community in rural Nova Scotia. This town has a population of less than 500 people. I drove up to the end of this road and there was a gate with a private property sign which lead to a private residence. The flags gave such a cult vibe.
Brandolini’s Law: It takes an order of magnitude more effort to refute misinformation than it does to produce it.
Take one of trans activism’s favourite catchphrases:
“Gender affirming care is evidence-based.”
Sounds plausible. Doctors wouldn’t perform drastic life-altering interventions on healthy kids in the total absence of credible evidence. Right?
Wrong.
The two linchpin Dutch studies upon which the entire experiment is based were so methodologically flawed that the results should have been completely invalidated.
But instead, the medical world mistook the experiment as proven medical practice and adopted the treatment globally and without restraint.
In a terrible twist of fate, this occurred in 2014, right at the very moment the messaging of trans activism triggered the social contagion of kids identifying as transgender.
In this part of my @May_Day_Canada talk I explain why it is simply impossible to call “gender affirming care” evidence based.
Darlington nurses respond to the publication of the EHRC Code of Practice:
Bethany Hutchison, Darlington nurse and President of the Darlington Nursing Union, said:
“The publication of the EHRC Code of Practice must mark the end of delay and denial. The NHS and other public bodies should have been following the law, and the Supreme Court’s ruling, all along. ‘Waiting for guidance’ has been used as a smokescreen to avoid making the necessary changes and to prolong the imposition of radical, Stonewall-influenced gender identity policies that have placed both staff and patients in deeply difficult situations. There are now no excuses, no more smoke and mirrors. The law must be followed.
“Frontline nurses have paid a heavy price for speaking up, and in Darlington we have seen first-hand the consequences of institutional failure. We now need urgent, system-wide reform to restore confidence, protect patient dignity, and ensure staff can carry out their duties without fear of reprisal.”
https://t.co/2Rdzm06rnn
I’m outside the annual general meeting of the Canadian paediatric Society in Ottawa, talking to pediatricians,
@CanPaedSociety needs to make a call for an independent review of evidence.
If the so-called evidence is good, then they’ve got nothing to lose.
The most powerful speech on biological women’s rights has just been delivered tonight, in New Zealand ❤️❤️❤️
“It is misogyny in a modern form to deny our reality”
I feel hope at last. Take a listen
And to think Julia Gillard grandstands as an expert on misogyny 😳
@JuliaMasonMD1 It’s more than surgery when 40% suffer a psychotic event post surgery like my daughter did. Its more than barbaric. The fallout of these decisions falls squarely on the parents financially and emotionally for years trying to get their child, adult or not functioning again.
Prof Baxendale’s prescription for the ailing field of youth gender medicine is more critical thinking, fewer ad hominem attacks, and appropriate use of evidence pyramid to guide treatments. The article is a highly engaging and educational read 👇 /end
https://t.co/kq96LJwvEP
In summary, bias can sustain weakly evidenced medical practices, especially in off-label treatments like hormone therapy for gender dysphoria. Disregarding the hierarchies of evidence & argumentation makes the arguments in the field unproductive, preventing course-correction. /9
I hate to point this out*, but accusing me of hating men because I don't think trans women should be given access to all women-only spaces does rather suggest that (in spite of your feverish assertions to the contrary) you're well aware that these are, in fact, men.
*I don't.
There is nothing compassionate or life affirming about cutting off healthy body parts and taking opposite sex hormones the rest of your life. We should be working from a model of self acceptance and body positivity rather than encouraging dissociation and delusion. This barbaric practice is no different than FGM or breast ironing. It’s a crime against humanity. 💔💔💔