A POLITICAL KIDNAPPING BUILT ON SECRET ACCUSERS
Since July 18, two American citizens, Andrew and Tristan Tate, have sat in a federal cell because the United Kingdom wants them. On October 5, the United States Government filed Britain's extradition requests in federal court in Miami. Every allegation in those papers comes from a British detective's summary, and not one word of it has ever been tested in a courtroom.
The United Kingdom redacted every accuser's name before it sent those papers to the United States, which is to say that the United States Government does not know who any of these women are. Two American citizens are being held on the word of secret accusers.
Not one of these women went to the police while any relationship at issue was going on. The first police report came in August 2022, years after the last event alleged, and three of the women did not come forward on their own: British police contacted them in 2025. Britain's papers cite no rape kit, no medical record, and no forensic evidence of any assault. One of the women told police she realized she had been "trafficked" only after Andrew became famous.
Britain accuses Andrew of misleading women about what they would do in Romania. Andrew denies it unequivocally, and Britain's own papers concede that the women were not physically forced to travel. One of them was told in writing, in an email Britain itself quotes, to try the job for three days and fly home if she did not like it.
The newest headlines concern images found on electronic devices. British police seized those devices in July 2015 and questioned Andrew in August 2016. He told them visitors used the devices in that house. He told them he had never downloaded, received, or viewed images of people with animals, and that images circulating in large group chats could have been saved to the devices automatically. Britain then waited almost ten years to charge any of it, authorizing these charges on July 10, 2026, eight days before Andrew was arrested in Miami. That is a dubious unfolding of events, to say the least.
As for Britain's four adult-image charges, the extradition treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom requires that the conduct be a crime in both countries, and possessing adult images in one's own home is not a crime in the United States.
The United Kingdom has carried out a political kidnapping of two American citizens and is now defaming them before the world with the most lurid accusations it could assemble. The low-IQ morons of the world may believe it, and Britain is counting on them. Those of us who see this despicable attack for what it is, however, recognize it as a good old-fashioned reputation assassination.
None of the people now lining up to condemn Andrew and Tristan would dare say a word of it if the two of them were online to answer. For years, Andrew and Tristan met every critic who came at them in public, in their own words, and took those critics apart. Their new accusers in the press and on social media waited until both men were locked in a federal cell, unable to answer in their own voices, before they found their courage.
Many of you now piling on know exactly how a coordinated media campaign works, because you have lived through one. You know how a narrative is assembled before the facts arrive, how an accusation becomes a headline before it becomes evidence, and how quickly yesterday's allies go silent when the machine turns. You are now lending your names to that same machine, and it has never shown loyalty to the people who feed it. When it comes for you, and it will, you will look for allies among the people you abandoned today, and you will find none.
In sum, the United Kingdom asks the United States to surrender two American citizens on the word of accusers it will not name, on stories told to police years after the fact, and on charges it waited a decade to bring, which is to say on nothing that has ever been tested.
Accordingly, any publication that repeats these accusations as fact does so at its own peril.
God bless Andrew and Tristan Tate.
Hey, @louistheroux, why did you edit out this context critical part from the Netflix documentary?
Was it because it shows my ex accepted my one-way polygamous relationship which blows up the narrative you tried to spin in the "documentary"?
This is JUST 1 of many clips I have proving your deceptive "journalism".
You’re a liar with an agenda, and it’s time for you to be exposed.
@Nate_Ya_M8@LadyA333@Cobratate Feeling this.
Hard to find solid people. I am in the process of hoping THE WAR ROOM, just had some gay matrix attack where they put a 7 day hold on the funds