Georgetown Security Studies Review

The official academic publication of Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Volume 12, Issue 1 of the Georgetown Security Studies Review is now available to view and download! 📖⤵

The submission deadline for the 12(2) edition has been set for November 10, 2024. https://t.co/k5gKhnTscz

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Russia’s exploitation of Libya further demonstrates that its challenge to NATO is not confined to the Eastern flank but also aims at the Southern flank.
https://t.co/1DYGNa7qcv

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

During the Afghanistan withdrawal, an ad-hoc group of veterans, government employees, and everyday citizens banded together for an extraordinary rescue mission. "Life and Death at Abbey Gate" is their story, the story of
#DigitalDunkirk.
https://t.co/qu3I1BAP3l

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Latin America’s new right-wing leaders have promised to deliver needed policy overhauls and reforms but have paved the way for democratic backsliding as populations trade democratic freedoms and liberties for greater security or economic stability.
https://t.co/sl3MSmNXIG

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The Precision-Guided podcast sits down with U.S. Ambassador Jimmy Story to discuss democratization trends and analyze their implications for the future of democracy in Latin America.
https://t.co/JJAcSNirvv

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Russia has revived the Soviet-era weaponizing of U.S. racial tensions, with the goal of undermining American democracy and distracting the United States from Moscow's expanding geopolitical interests.
https://t.co/YOmCabzQtw

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Myanmar’s civil war drags on, illuminating overlooked aspects of Indo-Pacific security. The conflict holds a magnifying glass to great power competition in the region, illustrating the role that the United States could play in addressing the crisis.
https://t.co/wsb4AlKzmM

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

EO 14110 leaves a critical question unaddressed: What should the government do once the model evaluations are triggered?
https://t.co/9O2FuL5AKx

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

We must position ourselves to win tomorrow’s conflicts by fighting as many of them virtually as possible. And, while wars of the future will certainly not be games, some games will help us win them.
https://t.co/RIAOXjRiKs

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

With competing demands for government spending and debt interest payments looming on the horizon, the United States may lack the revenue to meet green energy goals without access to more mature Chinese production markets.

https://t.co/eB0kF2bByM

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The vision for U.S.-Japan defense-industrial integration set out by recent administrations is a lofty proposition that will require considerable bureaucratic and industry movement, patience, and some betting on the U.S.-Japan defense relationship.
https://t.co/YlvxsqE71O

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

By demonstrating ways that patriarchal gender norms fuel extremist ideologies, recruitment, and operations, we can foster a more inclusive and gender-equal society that is resilient to extremist narratives.
https://t.co/3ZZvwJRlUU

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Russia continues to benefit when Ukrainian exports are complicated and compromised. Perhaps less directly, Russia profits from what the Houthis claim are protected shipments across the Red Sea, while Ukrainian exports remain at risk.
https://t.co/rUat9zXax4

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The rapid evolution of AI technologies and their potential for misuse by extremist groups demand a proactive approach that anticipates future threats while fostering innovation in counterterrorism methodologies.
https://t.co/fsfvAWL5HY

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The U.S. homeland BMD system against North Korea is effective and affordable. It does not inevitably provoke arms races nor hinder arms control. Instead, it enhances the credibility of the American deterrent against North Korea. https://t.co/VmBDDPpmRm

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The United States must remember the “forgotten war” in Sudan. The longer the civil war in Sudan continues, the more leverage Iran will gain–from its military aid–over the Sudanese Armed Forces. https://t.co/zOf84b5EZU

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

The United States and the West should lead efforts for Central Asia’s economic development away from thirsty cotton fields and towards more sustainable water practices.
https://t.co/LhdwFpW7O5

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Underpinning the alarming shifts in extremist activities is the rapid evolution of the Internet and social media technologies, which have become the tools to facilitate extremist communications and radicalization endeavors across the United States.
https://t.co/0OmMr8kFrQ

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Armenians in Artsakh faced a stark choice: resist and face certain massacre, or surrender and preserve life and liberty, albeit with only meager possessions.

https://t.co/gq4ern8Wau

[Georgetown Security Studies Review @GSSReview]

Given the many surprises in AI’s progress in the past decade, analysts should more clearly acknowledge and address the critical points of technological uncertainty/dispute before concluding that AMS will favor weaker or wealthier military actors.
https://t.co/on5D9MwpFo