Very disappointing decision, partially denying the Panda's preliminary injunction to enjoin the nonimmigrant visa ban as it applies to 171 Indian #h1B visa holders. The court expands executive authority under 212(f) to previously unknown limits. Order at https://t.co/pxor7ws93k
Judge Mehta cancelled argument today in Panda v Wolf. In light of that, I wouldn't be surprised to see a decision issued late afternoon today. Unsurprising to see a major decision filed late in the afternoon on a Friday before a long weekend/federal holiday. #H1B
@curtisatlaw @phillipkuck @gsiskind More nonsense from the team that brought you yesterday’s government “arguement.” We will kick this back in their teeth. Get the dentures ready.
Update in #AkervTrump, just 1 of 5 consolidated #noban cases, where plaintiffs represented by @ckuck @phillipkuck @gsiskind. Gov. just filed opposition to expired #dv2020 plaintiffs motion for class certification. https://t.co/Ib2AxlGkWU 1/10
Here is what I spent my day doing--Trying to stop Trump from stopping legal immigration to the United States. I believe that Judge Mehta will do the right thing.
https://t.co/0GUzF8XJWU
The preliminary injunction hearing in the Gomez v. Trump (& consolidated cases). I will be sharing thoughts as we go along. Should start in a few minutes & last about 90 to 120 minutes. This is a critical hearing. The judge will decide whether to enjoin the visa bans. 1
Mohammed/Aker/Gomez/Fonjong/Panda Update:
Judge has issued order suggesting the oral arguments tomorrow will take at least 1.5 hours, but probably 2 hours with rebuttals.
@curtisatlaw, @rafaesq, @gsiskind, @Immigrant_Atty, @pkuck and yours truly, filed our Reply brief in the Mohammed/Aker portion of the #DV2020 litigation. I truly believe we have the best and strongest arguments and look forward to Thursday's PI Hearing.
https://t.co/ujprEgGXHq
Mohammed/Aker/Gomez/Fonjong/Panda Update
(1) 3 reply briefs have been filed in support of PI/TRO.
(a) Joint from Mohammed, Aker and Fonjong plaintiffs
(b) Gomez plaintiffs
(c) Panda plaintiffs
(2) Gomez plaintiffs have filed reply in support of class certification 1/2
#DrMvTrump#dv2020 update: Pursuant to the court’s order, Chris Lyerla, @TheJusticeDept Attorney for Defendants @POTUS and @SecPompeo, has provided us just now with this partially unredacted slide. It is helpful to show at least 2 things:1/3
This helps explain why embassies worldwide are not applying national interest exceptions to DVs, even though they’ve never said that publicly, and on August 12, put out update suggesting that they do. They’re 221(g)ing those apps.
https://t.co/3Qn1ENwPmH
pst @NicoletteGlazer
Why should expedited requests wait for services to resume
@StateDept@TravelGov? Are consulates already not processing some NIVs? 5+months now, why the standard response to pause NIVs? Why is public kept in the dark? Ridiulous! @ImmAttyBanias @USAmbIndia@curtisatlaw@gsiskind
Remember when @TravelGov told us resumption of routine visa operations will be based on local conditions?
In 7/1 webinar, @StateDept told employees "posts must not resume routine services until told to do so by the Department." 𝘋𝘳 𝘔𝘰𝘩𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘷 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱, CAR 000206.