@RealJamesMJr @DanBilzerian@ComicDaveSmith functionally equivalent...demand supposedly incontrovertible source to avoid admitting the obvious
& your "honest opinion" just happens to be you pretending people aren't observing real patterns
@RealJamesMJr @DanBilzerian@ComicDaveSmith no you first implied there is no evidence (pattern), then tried to change subject to psych assessment of noticers. then admitted there's a pattern but said you need equivalent of peer reviewed study to verify its meaning
just playing dumb as much as you can get away with
@RealJamesMJr @DanBilzerian@ComicDaveSmith lol no first you pretended the pattern didn't exist.
then when caught you said 1 crazy people see patterns. then 2 even if there is a pattern you need equivalent of libs peer review study to draw any conclusions
basic game of playing dumb about most basic shit to kill discourse
@RealJamesMJr @DanBilzerian@ComicDaveSmith bro this is the lib playbook. 1 tell you ur mentally ill when you notice something. 2 demand peer reviewed studies before theyll admit the most basic shit
comes back to pretending you don't understand in order to make discourse impossible
@RealJamesMJr @DanBilzerian@ComicDaveSmith lol so exactly the game i named. you're pretending not to understand that actual patterns are being recognized
@War4theWest@mdubowitz hey nice use of always accuse your enemies of what you're doing. greater israel project? never heard of it. the greater iran project tho...
@bernardtjoy@1brad_ass if strictly defined and body chemistry or some such measured, then yes. intelligence is measured by how efficiently and accurately meaning is derived from data
@bernardtjoy@1brad_ass yes, situations or formal tests that allow us to chart amount of information logged and readily accessed, and whether correct answers are derived from that information, measure it
@bernardtjoy@1brad_ass "intelligence" describes gathering and managing information and from it discerning patterns and essences. IQ rates different levels of effectiveness and efficiency in this process
@JenelopeJohnson@StefanMolyneux you might not understand the problem. under materialism you don't get to decide cause and effect doesnt apply. that's the whole point
@JenelopeJohnson@StefanMolyneux lol no. presupposing a starting point, physical cause for any effect, is the basis of materialism. it does not support infinite regress, which is a logical impossibility