CalzerDan

ZZ | Anarcho-Objectivist

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@fiat_money @TyKeynes All you've done here is prove why empiricism alone is inadequate to study economics. Your example of public deficit = private surplus is that the currency is now worthless because inflation, and the government can't make the calculations necessary to avoid inflation.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@user3927818 Menger debunked Marxism within Marx's lifetime. Marxism wasn't even popular until after the Bolshevik Revolution

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@gentrywgevers The math is not simple. A vote for a Libertarian is a vote for a Libertarian. No one else.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Hortysir @gentrywgevers I'd go a step further, no human being has the ability to rule me, you or anyone else.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@mesmerizedfool @CupasTopNigga @user3927818 So yeah, you're gonna have to choose unironic misogyny and racism or Libertarianism.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Ungovernab1e @headsparks_ @CupasTopNigga @user3927818 That is whim-based, but serious.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@StatelessAttica Her tweet reads like a trashlib who got ratiod into the soil saying shit 'You hate me because you know I'm right."

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@AntimutualistA Antistatism through the state... You're basically saying that we have to choose between the state and the state. This isn't antistatist, this is your state versus another state.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@KirillMagidson There's been a recent pattern of people appealing to the worst authorities they can find. I don't care what Liebowitz says, things aren't so because he says so.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@mesmerizedfool @CupasTopNigga @user3927818 It is one or the other when it comes to the essence of what a government is, which is the monopoly of aggression. The centralisation is a consequence of that. Also, yes, if there is a local government, it has a monopoly on aggression over that locality.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@StatelessAttica Oh, I saw that. I kinda ducked out because I couldn't come up with something worth saying on it. It's so stupid that it's easy to respond to.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Lily81127145 The basic issue is that anything in the middle is a contradiction, so it can't sustain itself, and it will resolve one way or another. To put it another way, it's a system in transition. The problem is that there is a false dichotomy on what the available consistent positions are

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Millanphilipose Technological advancement is so unstoppable that even Luddites must use to resist it.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Much8Less @user3927818 Fair enough.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Much8Less @user3927818 So the NAP applies to them then, and you're just messing me around?

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@mesmerizedfool @CupasTopNigga @user3927818 Centralisation is not the defining characteristic of a government, it's the monopoly on aggression.

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@RegularSanStan @Gattungswesen25 Go on, how do they contradict each other?

[CalzerDan @Gamer_Callan]

@Ungovernab1e @CupasTopNigga @user3927818 True... but best keep people from getting ideas. They are Hoppeans after all.