Sharing and streaming all kinds of games including table top and video games. Check us out every other Saturday night for live dungeon and dragons adventures.
I’m sorry I don’t care who she is. If the other lady had the right to be there in the public space. So did she. The video shows who was being antagonistic. You can fuck right off with your bs. The cop was going after the girl because she knew that the other lady was belligerent and that the girl was more likely to back down.
So the liberal just has to act obnoxious toward a conservative and the conservative has to back down in order to de escalate? Bull shit. I would have told this cop to go do her job. Leave me alone. If she is going to arrest me and violate my rights she will lose her qualified immunity.
De escalate. 😂😂. She went after the one that wasn’t being antagonistic.
Bro you’re dense and a moron. If you can’t defend your subjective morality. There is no point in the conversation.
I’m not here to teach you basic philosophy. I’m also no here to debate the difference between objective and subjective morals. My claim is subjective morality is just my preferences vs yours. Regardless where mine come from. Your preferences are no more justifiable than my own. Therefor you have no right to say anything that anyone else is doing is wrong. It’s just what you feel like at the time. It’s as easily interchangeable as what you feel like eating for lunch. And I might not like what you decide to eat for lunch. You have no position to judge anyone else on it.
I’m done wasting time trying to keep you on topic. Get bent moron
It doesn’t matter where it comes from. It’s just my preference to follow it. Just like it’s your preference to have the morals you have. I don’t have to defend my beliefs. The op was a positive. It’s your job to defend that. Not try and find a pseudo position to attack. Stick to the original post. Stop trying to obfuscate the conversation to a prompt you want to attack.
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 No you’re trying to change the debate to a different topic. And you’re getting frustrated because you want to put me in the negative position when I have already stated my claim. Why don’t you want to contend the actual claim? Hmmm? Because you know you can’t.
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 lol I have told you my position. It was in my original post. It’s my position and claim that your morals or her morals are not better than anyone else’s. You’re trying to change the prompt. Why don’t we stick to the prompt at hand. Can you defend subjective morality or not?
Yeah that wouldn’t be you. You don’t even know what an internal critique is.
Also you keep trying to push me into a Bible debate. That’s not what this is. I don’t know why you want to debate the Bible so bad. Can you not defend your own beliefs? You just want to attack the Bible?
I’m giving you basic philosophy and you jump straight to. “But your bible”. My Bible? Have I claimed any scripture yet? And I’m not using logic? lol you are so used to making presuppositions that you presuppose I’m some Bible thumper. What a moron.
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 Yes but my post was about the posters morals. My morals aren’t the one in question here. I never said mine are better. Why would you assume that I did?
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 Why are you using logic? Where do those laws come from? That sounds like your presupposing in order to justify your claim. You’re borrowing from a being that doesn’t exist in order to define why he doesn’t exist. 😂
No. I am saying you claim your morals are subjective and I am explaining to you by way of internal critique that it’s impossible.
You are presupposing morality. You are saying because this thing has been told to me to be good. There for its good. But you never stop to think what good itself is.
Like looking at a color. Your entire life your told the color orange is in fact orange. You just take for granted that it’s orange. But what if someone else was told that color is blue? It doesn’t change the color. Just changes the word used to represent it.
Morality can not be an opinion. Otherwise there is no foundation for what it actually means to be good. And if there is no good or bad. Then there is no justice and with no justice. Nothing is moral. Or immoral.
So. The last question. Define good. What makes something “good”?
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 Actually I believe subjective morality is impossible. Because it’s infinitely regressive or just your preference. If it’s just your preference the. It’s not morality. It’s things you like and dislike.
@Carlsrevenge2@iamAtheistGirl@Flurshus1417 Wait. Do you have a justification to say that rape is bad? Why is rape bad? Whaat makes slavery bad?
All those just boil down to either one of two paths for you. Either 1 it’s infinitely regressive. Or 2. It’s bad because you just don’t like it.
That’s not what I said. I said my morals are my preference. I never said they were subjective. However you have no justification to say you are any better then I am because your morals are just preference.
So if my culture says that it is ok for human sacrifice. Then you have no justification to tell me I’m wrong. Because your morals are just based on your opinion.