I have tried countless times to reach someone to talk about this matter, and I've also tried to DM this account, but I never got a reply. If possible, could someone from your team reach out via DM so we could talk, and I can provide any additional information or explanations? I would really appreciate someone from the internal team reviewing my channel to see that the actual content on the channel is not mass-produced or repetitive, and that they actually include a lot of personal expression that is unique to me.
Hello @YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”
My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.
The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”
I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”
I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.
To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.
My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM
- doesn’t follow the rubric
- doesn’t answer the prompt
- doesn’t cite proper evidence
- another professor agreed with her grade
- looks like it was written by a high school freshman
- gets shit grade
- blames trans people
"I am going to demonstrate for the ghetto in the Gaza Strip! My family fought Hitler , not like you Zionist cowards!" "you are a racist, children are being murdered" "you hate democracy go to hell"
A man in New York City confronts pro-Israel protesters.
Those gaps are for either studying or eating lunch really slowly while staring nonstop at your phone. If you choose to waste that valuable time, then that’s on you
I know the vibes don’t indicate as much right now (especially on social media) but this stuff ***will*** end up biting the conservative movement in the ass. History students a couple decades from now are going to see images like this and think “how in the actual fuck??”