@atheldane@NikkiNic9384 I blame Gianni Infantino A man so corrupt he has to have a team of men to screw his trousers on every morning He has sold football down the river Sucking up to that fat Oange Cunt with an entirely made up "peace prize" FIFA stand to make $250m selling advertising in water breaks
@KPac687@jakempugh@NikkiNic9384 Yes posh kids at Eton called it Soccer which came from asSOCiation football to distinguish it from Rugby football. Posh kids who don't play it. No one actually uses the term since about 1920. It's "Football" all over the world.
@KPac687@NikkiNic9384 They had them in Quatar but at the discretion of the referee if conditions warranted it and it was 30seconds NOT a 3 minute advertising break. We now get players standing about for 2 minutes while Fox TV finishes running it's ads. That's purely for the US market.
@Triggahappy209@NikkiNic9384 No the game is NOT evolving you arrogant septic prick. It will never be a game of 4 quarters to facilitate ad breaks. It's a one off aberration purely for Yank TV. Football belongs to the rest of the world NOT the US. It ruins the spectacle for proper fans.
@DavidCraft59571@NikkiNic9384 No mate. You're a bit dim aren't you. Nobody gives a flying fuck if US TV covers football or not. It's the World Cup. The biggest sporting event on the planet. It doesn't need US TV coverage. Fundamental changes to the game aren't justifiable to sell it to people who don't care.
@NikkiNic9384 Yes because it was a fucking stupid thing to ask? The World Cup should never have been in the US because they haven't got the intellectual capacity to understand the game. Inserting an artificial advertising break in the middle of a half is utterly abhorrent to any football fan
@CDCCellular@NikkiNic9384 No...We don't want the game to appe to Americans. It doesn't need them and they haven't got the mental capacity to appreciate it. Now fuck off.