@oguzhantekden@Hittitia This is true, Koreans have close to 0% Turkic DNA. Only very rare Uyghur/Gokturk migrants. These Chinese bots say anything to win an argument
@Hittitia There's no doubt Koreans have minimal Turkic DNA. Anatolian Turks have majority local ancestry, but there is still a significant amount of their ancestry that comes from the nomads.
@tenismemis@bberkai@uzonmesteriadam There are clear records that state in the early days of the Mongol Empire, both commoners and Elites referred to themselves as Tatar, at least to foreigners. This is a good video on the topic https://t.co/Bb7bkT08D0
@bberkai@tenismemis@uzonmesteriadam Furthermore, the Mongols directly referred to themselves as Tatars in letters to foreign states before they widely adopted the Mongol label.
@Steppeman1465@Alt_Logos_35 What is this nonsense bro we have records of Khitans being settled in Khalkha lands and disappearing from history. The YR and West Eurasian elements in medieval Mongols are shown in academic studies
@Steppeman1465@Alt_Logos_35 Khitans and other Mongolic populations had even higher levels of YR ancestry. Both West Eurasian and YR ancestry has been a part of Mongolic populations since before the Mongol Empire
@HunJiaHuan@Steppeman1465@Alt_Logos_35 A few Kazakhs every now and then have lighter hair and Western features, so they'll take that and pretend they look widely different from Mongols.
@Wanan666666 Hanshu Phase 2 is not even agreed on as a Buyeo site. Not a single DNA study is done on the Goguryeo people and the bottom 1% VPN using scum of China go around writing fanfictions about their DNA. Meanwhile, all their ancestors record the connection of Goguryeo and the peninsula.
@Wanan666666@hanakasa125749 Hanshu Phase-2 is not even confirmed to be the direct ancestors of the Buyeo, forget the Goguryeo people. Your pea sized brain can't comprehend such complicated topics, so move on to other brain rotting nationalist slop talk.