Mrs. Ghenet wasn't typical #Eritrean farmer. She was born & raised in the city, studied mathematics at the University of #Asmara. But through her relentless efforts, she has become successful in agriculture and production clean & sustainable energy. #NUEW https://t.co/HJQ7s3Q9W3
#Eri101:
Eritrea and Ethiopia signed the Asmara Declaration on 9 July 2018 and the Jeddah Agreement on 16 September 2018, in which they agreed, inter alia, to:
- respect each other's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and
- implement the decisions of the EEBC.
#Eritrea Unyielding: Defending Sovereignty Against Ethiopia’s Recycled Ambitions; Research and Information Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 23 November 2025
*...The orchestrated chorus of statements and reports is a futile attempt to recast Ethiopia as a de facto Red Sea key stakeholder. Its 'sovereign' port-access arguments, framed through selective invocations of security, historical memory, and economic necessity, are legally untenable. They deliberately omit foundational facts: the inviolability of State sovereignty; the African Union and United Nations Charters’ norms on territorial integrity; and the conflation of legitimate development needs with extraterritorial claims no regional or international framework can legitimize".
*...Coastal States bear primary responsibility for the security, management, and stewardship of their own coastlines. Ethiopia, as a landlocked state, cannot assume the role of Viceroy over Eritrea’s sovereign maritime domain. Yet, in a predictable pattern, these threats are framed not as genuine calls for regional cooperation but as a pretext for advancing Ethiopian illicit claims. Proponents suggest that Ethiopia’s need to 'protect regional commerce' legitimizes a permanent maritime presence along Eritrea’s coast, a reinterpretation that would effectively override Eritrea’s sovereignty".
*"...Revisionism peaks with the claim that 'the Eritrean colony was deliberately created to block Ethiopia’s access to the sea'; a historically false and legally absurd notion. Eritrea’s borders were established through international treaties and in accordance with normative State-formation processes in modern day African nations. Eritrea is not an 'anti-Ethiopian construct'; it emerged through protracted historical and legal processes; occupation under various colonizers; UN-imposed Federation, resistance to illegal annexation, an internationally supervised referendum, and UN admission".
*"...Cross-border kinship exists across Africa; it does not confer a right to annex. Indeed, Ethiopia itself would be severely balkanized if this logic is pushed to its limits. Oil-rich Ogaden would be incorporated into Somalia; Benishangul into South Sudan etc. By invoking Afar identity, Ethiopia seeks to frame Eritrea’s sovereign coastline as a natural entitlement. Statehood and littoral status are legal facts, not demographic or emotional constructs. Ethiopia’s size does not convert a landlocked state into a littoral one".
*... Ethiopian Foreign Minister Gedion’s mockery of the Nakfa Principles as a 'syndrome' is revealing. Nakfa embodies self-reliance, discipline, resilience, and national sacrifice, the very values that have allowed Eritrea to maintain stability and sovereignty despite decades of external aggression. By dismissing Nakfa as a 'syndrome', Gedion exposes not Eritrea’s shortcomings, but Ethiopia’s discomfort with a neighbor whose discipline, independence, and cohesive national ethos it cannot easily comprehend. Where Medemer remains a rhetorical project, Nakfa is a lived reality: a blueprint of survival, governance, and unwavering defense of the people and the State".
https://t.co/Dr98oGVOBz
#TBT to UNCT Retreat in Asmara, #Eritrea 🇪🇷! Under theme “Delivering on Commitments: Deepening Impact, Strengthening Systems, Shaping the Future”, we renewed our partnership commitment, reflected on current global context impacting & set joint priorities.
Watch highlights!🎥
🇪🇷 A vivid, massive, & enthusiastic welcome ceremony for our heroes. Thousands cheering & waving as the National Team returned with an incredible 10 MEDALS!
Congrats to the team and the ppl of Eritrea for the successive dominance of African cycling. The legacy continues!
STOP the geopolitics inferno in #Ethiopia NOW. Dressed up in many kinds of provided uniforms, leaders like GETACHEW have been incessantly playing with blood, sweat & tears of #Ethiopia#Eritrea#Somalia エリトリア PEACE IS A MUST NOT A CHOICE! #UNSC#UNSG
https://t.co/xOIC6kchg0
Prosperity Party (aka Potemkin Party) signature media trademark is better encapsulated in the following algebraic equation:
PP propaganda = Optics + Posturing + Deception + Disinformation; (the four variables have different weights depending on the event/intended objective).
This is indeed the hallmark of the numerous articles churned out on a daily/weekly basis by PP's extensive media platforms (Horn Review; Foreign Policy Institute; X accounts of hired lobbyists etc.).
Latest spin in this profusely boring and stale saga revolves on misconstruing the ordinary and periodic foreign military visits to Addis Ababa - Italian Navy; AFRICOM, France's Armed Forces etc. - as "explicit and pronounced endorsement of its quest for access to the sea".
The hollow optics of the whole affair apart, the controversy has never been on normative access to the sea. Truth is, Ethiopia enjoys a "buyers' market" with a wide latitude of choices and options for cementing viable commercial agreements with all the transit countries in the HoA neighbourhood for purposes of trade.
"Sovereign access to the sea" is however a toxic agenda that infringes on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ethiopia's neighbours in flagrant violation of international law, and, the foundational principles of the UN Charter and the AU Constitutive Act.
Another intriguing/perplexing dimension of PP's quest for "sovereign access to the sea" is its repeated allusion to the exigency of projecting "Naval power in the Red Sea".
True, the Red Sea is an important maritime route for global commercial trade. But this does not mean that all the countries - from near or far - whose commercial transactions somehow pass through the Red Sea have a "legal right or exigency" to acquire naval bases on the shores of the Red Sea!
As expounded in the link below, the littoral States of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden have a consensual position on their obligations and legal prerogatives in securing and promoting enduring and sustainable stability of the crucial international maritime route.
In the event, Potemkin Party's elusive obsession of projecting "naval power" in the Red Sea has no security rationale or dividends whatsoever. And besides its dangerous legal and security ramifications, the obsession is indeed akin to the adage: "ጽንብላሊዕ'ሲ መቐመጫኣ ዘይከደነት፥ ምድሪ ከደነት" ።
https://t.co/Y69MJ6Tn4u
Eritrea is committed to:
- contribute its share to the promotion of peace & security in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea Regions.
- to contribute to the collective effort of making AU-EU partnership a win-win engagement, that adds value to the two Unions, through co-ownership.
On the invitation of General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, the Chairman of Sudan's Sovereign Council, President Isaias Afwerki arrived in Port Sudan in the early afternoon hours today for a working visit.
Yes, Eritrea has limited internet access for the public, but government sectors and schools have full access. However, the Internet cannot be the sole measure of a country. A nation should be judged by the social justice it provides to its citizens. In Eritrea, education, from kindergarten to college, is free. Healthcare is also free for everyone. Furthermore, the government has built schools, hospitals, clinics, and roads, and provides electricity and clean water to all villages and towns without discrimination. Furthermore, Eritrea is the most peaceful and stable country where Muslims and Christians live in peace and harmony. This is something you will never hear in many African countries.
#Eritrea Adulis
New analysis of Adulis’ artifacts flips the script: 70% of all NHA coinage was found at Adulis, the Throne of Adulis was a high-tech symbol of regional authority, and elite Christian officials even called the Aksumite king a “minor king.” Adulis wasn’t a port it was the powerhouse.
https://t.co/Oy5g8rKrxQ
«Meanwhile, few Ethiopians today know what was done in their name during the 30-year war. Independent researchers estimate that more than 250,000 #Eritrean civilians were killed, numbers the #Ethiopian state has neither acknowledged nor apologized for.»
👉🏾https://t.co/nACnj68oSF