17 year ago today I went into labour, on my 16th birthday. 3 days later I gave birth to a beautiful baby girl. I thought I was saved from the horror I was living, being raped daily by gangs of men for years. I thought that we would both be saved and we would get to a safe place and live happily ever after. Instead they took her from me because "i was exposed to a pedophile ring and it wasnt safe for a child", yet they left me there to carry on being raped.
17 years ive lived without her. Without knowing where she is or if she is even alive. Ive missed her first everything. I sometimes lay and imagine hiw she will look or what she is like. There will always be a part of me missing that went when they took her. There will always be grief for every second I live without her in my life, and no amount of justice will ever bring that back. No amount of accountability on failings will ever fix that.
Every year on my birthday I struggle knowing that 3 days later im missing her birthday and that its another year added onto my grief.
This year has been harder than normal with everything else going on and the trauma this has all dragged up for me.
Im normally the strong one. The one that picks things up for the others and helps them fight. Thats there listening to them and helping them through their suffering. But right now im barley even getting through each day and I feel like im letting everyone down.
Im trying to pick myself back up and face everything head on but its not as easy as I wish it was. Im 33 year old today and what happened to me as a child still haunts each and every day, each and every dream and every part of my life. Its left scars that will never heal and a burden thats hard to carry. Im sorry to everyone thats having to deal with seeing my statuses as I know they are alot different lately than they normally are but I really think its important that people understand the level of trauma left for the victims to deal with and the failings still coming along with that. Everyone sees me holding things together on TV and fighting all the time, but in reality I still have to deal with so much that sometimes the load can become unbearable.
Recently is one of them times.
James Murray, secrétaire à la Santé britannique :
« J'ai changé d'avis, les femmes trans ne sont pas des femmes, les femmes ne peuvent pas avoir de pénis. ».
La journaliste Camilla Tominey :
« Des gens comme vous ont nié le sexe biologique et les femmes ont été harcelées par le lobby trans », oui petit à petit c’est le retour à la raison mais des femmes dans tous les pays dont la France sont encore harcelées, perdent leur travail, sont condamnées par la justice pour avoir refusé cette folie qui nie la réalité biologique, pour avoir défendu leurs droits spécifiques liés à leur sexe, pour avoir refusé de nier le sexe biologique.
@KnownHeretic@KDansky I agree with you, but "dysphoria" simply means "feeling bad". In this case about being the sex you are, about stereotypical roles you're expected to play etc. As such, this feeling exists. What's fabricated is the "I'm a gendered soul trapped in a wrong body" obsession
There are many people who claim in all sincerity to have been saved by giving all their money to Scientology or the Moonies. This may even be true. We look at them and feel pity -- but the cult gave them what they were lacking in life. It gave them community. It gave them a sense of purpose. It gave a structure to their desire and their striving.
That is what cults sell and what its salesmen sell successfully precisely because they are themselves true believers in their product because they did in fact derive many of the benefits they sell to others from their own immersion in the cult.
This is what transgenderism sells to its adherents. It sells a story of magical self-transformation that is also the attainment of an authentic self. It does so through rituals of self-mortification that impose a sunk cost so great on those inflicting them on themselves that escaping the resulting immersion in a fictive, pseudo-reality that would vindicate such a sacrifice -- constructed in the same way that all social realities are constructed, through institutional validation -- becomes nearly impossible. "Death before detransition." It does so by creating intense trauma bonds between those who have undergone the rituals, which are further intensified by the cultivated sense of being oppressed unto death by the cisnormative world that surrounds them.
In a liberal, pluralistic society that honors freedom of speech and freedom of association, we don't ban commercial cults. We allow them to proselytize. What we don't do is give them access to schools to recruit children, we don't brainwash children in the millions to accept their beliefs as the only truth, we don't give their cult rituals the imprimatur of medicine, we don't allow them to use state power to force people to pay obeisance to their cult dogmas. The President doesn't affirm their dogmas or direct his executive agencies to propagate them.
Transgenderism is novel in this way. Sharing aspects of many prior group psychological phenomenon -- the social contagions of eating disorders and Recovered Memory Syndrome, the business model of multi-level marketing schemes, the trauma-bonding of the gang initiation or the hazing ritual -- it melded these elements with institutional capture via two masquerades in which it successfully passed as something it is not: firstly, as a form of medicine, secondly, as a civil rights movement.
Undoing this unbelievable concatenation may actually be beyond the critical and epistemic capacities of the Western world.
I have been ordered to pay $95,000 in "damages" to two men in women's sport because I apparently hurt their feelings. It is potentially going to be doubled because I didn't pay in 30 days. So that is $190,000 in total to reward two men in women's sport. I am appealing in the NSW Supreme Court, so for now, there is a stay on the orders.
@salltweets has been ordered to pay a man $20,000 for not allowing him on her female only app. His hurt feelings claim is hoping to be challenged in the High Court. Sall is still waiting to see if leave will be granted for the appeal.
Jasmine Sussex could have to pay up to $95,000 to a man with hurt feelings who falsely claimed he could breastfeed a tiny baby. Her case is still to be heard by a Queensland tribunal.
None of these numbers include the court costs which run into millions.
Others have lost jobs, been censored, gaslit or threatened if they speak the truth or object to the lie that men can be women.
Men who wish they were women not only want to dominate our sports, spaces and services, they are also trying to make money as they go. It appears quite lucrative if they succeed.
Stand with us. Men are not women and we should never be penalized for stating the facts - especially in court where evidence and facts are meant to be paramount.
It was ok to talk about priests being physically abusive before it was ok to start talking about the sexual stuff they were up to
Likewise, we have to wade through years of talking about medical harms before everyone is ready to talk about autogynephilia
PLEASE CAN I ASK EVERYONE TO COMPLETE A REQUEST TO HAVE THIS SENTENCE REVIEWED AS UNDULY LENIENT - link in comments.
▪️ Scott Hennefer sexually assaulted a young girl under the age of 13 - he said he didn’t know why he did it, but it may have been because he was “seeking comfort”.
▪️The Judge said she was 'convinced' the 'best way to protect the public' was not for him to 'lose his liberty', but to suspend his sentence and work with probation for the next three years.
▪️The Judge told the Hennefer he had shown genuine remorse and that she believed the offence was linked to his poor mental health.
▪️She stated "I'm prepared to accept this was a completely one-off offence - something you did without thinking through your motivation or your consequences."
▪️After sentencing she noticed someone in the public gallery pointing at Hennefer, so she asked the court clerk to Tannoy to see if there was a police officer in the building.
▪️The Judge then told Hennefer that she hoped to talk to a police officer about 'seeing if action could be taken against that person in the public gallery'.
ONCE AGAIN, THE JUDICIARY DISPLAYING CONCERN FOR THE WELFARE OF PAEDOPHILES.
AND ONCE AGAIN, ANOTHER NONCE WALKS FREE FROM COURT.
https://t.co/pQ8ivfS2h9
Dora Moutot never stood a chance. The Paris tribunal that heard her case was full of queer activists. The prosecutor apparently wanted her condemned for slandering men because she pointed out that women need to be wary of males. Women and girls don’t have a hope in hell of keeping themselves safe in a country where queer activists have taken over the courts.
The professional gays at @RienAGuerir — upper class power hungry men pretending to be *marginalised* — are now sharing this video, still bullying Dora into silence. They took her livelihood, her sponsorships (she was a successful instagram influencer) and her reputation simply for stating the truth.
The high priests of French Queerdom couldn’t let her get away with it.
France is one of the countries that may be beyond hope. Men like Benoit Berthe and the other Vichy queers have all the power. They’ve infested everything and still they claim to be victims.
When a woman can’t even talk about the concerns she has about lesbian bars being taken over…
Women are absolutely being silenced. This is what silencing looks like after it’s been programmed.
@ZackPolanski The people most responsible for the rise of the far right, are people like you. Your insane beliefs, including the one that children can be born in the wrong body and must be medicalised for it, make it impossible for sane people, even life-long leftists, to vote for the left.
Scottish taxpayers, against the vast majority’s will, funded an attempt by the government to keep men in women’s prisons. Never have I been so tempted to move to Monaco and give all the money I’ve been paying in tax to groups fighting the rank misogyny of Swinney’s government.
2013: I messaged @suzanne_moore and said, "Trouble at mill, sister". 'Why', she asked? "Julie Burchill has defended us in the Observer and all hell is going to break loose!" Guess what happened next? https://t.co/CqM9nfTDSP
These are the TQI+ Queer lot who now own Pride.
I hate that I'm associated with this due to my sexuality. This fetish, and all the others seen at Pride *including Trans* have absolutely nothing to do with me or my life, yet somehow this is my "community", this is what's meant to represent me
LGB acceptance has gone down recently, things like this are way.
Trans activists have defaced signage at a historical women's nudist public pool in Bern, Switzerland.
The sign at the Paradiesli reads, "Entry for Women Only," and trans activists crossed out "women" and replaced it with "TINFA", for Trans, Inter, Non-binary, Women, and Agender.
They also wrote "No place for transphobia, no place for queerphobia".
On Sunday, June 28, a man exposed his genitals to the women there while claiming to be a "transgender woman".
News outlets reported that "the trans woman had exposed her penis."
Police were called and the "trans woman" resisted arrest. A fight broke out, resulting in injury to a female police officer.
The pool management apologized and stated that anyone who calls himself a woman may access the women's area.
Bern city councillor Ursina Anderegg said, "In the city of Bern, anyone who identifies as a woman is considered a woman."
One witness who survived childhood sexual abuse said the incident caused her to become upset due to her past trauma.
No one disputes that people pretending to be something they are not exist and have a right to lie to themselves and others about the fact of their sex.
What's at issue is whether other people have a duty to sacrifice their comfort, privacy, safety, and fair competition to indulge them in these lies, and whether state power will be used to compel such sacrifices.
In all cases, the answer will be no.
By dead name, they mean birth name. By violence, they mean boundaries.
By erasure, they mean being ignored.
By oppression, they mean women saying no. By woman, they mean submissive.
By rights they mean entitlement, and by misgendering, they mean accurately naming sex.
Rosanne Hertzberger vroeg niet of het Dutch Protocol netjes wordt uitgevoerd. Zij vroeg om onderzoek naar de fysieke en mentale gezondheidsuitkomsten na behandeling volgens het Dutch Protocol, vergeleken met landen die inmiddels een andere zorgstandaard hanteren. Daarna is die vraag door toenmalig minister Pia Dijkstra versmald tot: past de bestaande Nederlandse richtlijn binnen het gezondheidsrechtstatelijke kader? De Gezondheidsraad heeft dat uitgevoerd en vervolgens vooral bevestigd dat de Nederlandse procedure zorgvuldig is ingericht. Maar dat is dus NIET waar Hertzberger om vroeg.
Niemand heeft hier gewonnen. Rosanne Hertzberger niet, Tom Kneusmeijer niet, mensen met genderdysforie niet, en de belastingbetaler al helemaal niet. We zijn bijna 2,5 jaar verder na de motie, en er is werkelijk niets duidelijker geworden over de uitgangspunten van het Dutch Protocol. Het enige wat steeds duidelijker wordt, is dat de vragen die ertoe doen niet gesteld mogen worden, dat het publieke debat wordt geleid door emotionele chantage, maar vooral dat deze situatie onhoudbaar is. “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”
@koenvdv666@SEeckelaerts O jawel. Helaas. Theoretisch zou je gelijk moeten hebben, maar zo werken onze hersenen blijkbaar niet. Zodra je iemand met "zij" aanspreekt ga je die onvermijdelijk ook als "een soort vrouw" zien. Die dus meteen "minder rechten heeft" dan "andere vrouwen".
Don’t forget: you’re not a feminist unless you include all women, and all men who say they are women, and all women and men who say they are neither women nor men, but *not* women who say men aren't women.