The EU now know that, at least with this Labour government, it can demand anything and sooner or later the UK will concede and give it whatever it wants.
We need to ban this government from even speaking to the EU at this stage.
Traitorous.
https://t.co/5v7SYqSZx4
The entire left-wing establishment has managed to convince the majority of the British public that anyone calling for a return to equality before the law is 'stirring up hatred and division'.
Let that sink in for a moment.
In France there is a new activity that the Left is getting their knickers in a twist about.
Le Canon Français is running massive banquets. For about £70 you can have great food and drinks and spend time singing patriotic songs.
The “Far Left” is furious.
LFI says it has evidence of racist chanting, and of immigrant staff being insulted. With pork regularly on the menu, they say the feasts are purposely designed to exclude Muslims and vegetarians.
Meanwhile, everyday people who love France, love food and beer are having the time of their lives.
Last year when North Yorkshire Police arrested me for the infamous "Fuck Hamas" meme, they sent two gormless plod who were in no way qualified to to adjudicate on a political issue like that. Now it transpires the force has been ideologically captured to serve Islam. It all makes sense now.
Just so we're clear on how absolutely stupid the British Government is.
When a petition is signed with over 2 million people saying No to Digital ID, it gets ignored.
When 9000 people answer an online, unadvertised survey, suddenly it's "overwhelming support".
What is far right?
Historically, the far right refers to political movements that are authoritarian, anti-democratic, and often seek to organise society around ethnic, racial, or religious hierarchies.
It does not simply mean:
Supporting border controls.
Believing in biological sex.
Defending women’s rights.
Criticising a religion.
Supporting free speech.
Holding conservative views.
If “far right” means anyone who disagrees with progressive politics, then the term has lost all meaning.
You can label me far right all you like, it won’t change the words I say or the views I hold.
This is who we are up against.
These retards can't understand basic concepts. Her stupid smug face and neck say it all.
Of course more immigration means less housing availability, it's common sense you clown.
His job is to engineer civil unrest, delivering a Digital ID mandate for his WEF handlers.
This isn’t about popularity — and it never was.
What’s unfolding feels increasingly calculated, not accidental.
A steady push of policy after policy, each one framed as efficiency, safety, or modernization — yet collectively pointing toward something far more rigid underneath.
Digital identity systems. Centralized verification frameworks. Expanding requirements to access basic services in an increasingly monitored environment.
Supporters call it progress. Critics see something else taking shape: a quiet tightening of control wrapped in the language of convenience.
And the most unsettling part isn’t just the direction — it’s how normal it’s being made to feel while it happens.
Because once these systems are fully embedded, walking them back becomes almost impossible.
At that point, it’s no longer about debate.
It’s about structure.
New Restore policy suggestion — ostracise people like Davey for 10 years Athens style, except they have to go live under Hamas in Gaza dressed in pride colours
Man's so inadequate. A weak, inadequate, brittle, turd sniffing, cum rag guzzling, whiny, bumbashart. A slab of repressed luncheon meat desperate to truncheon the English into a wheelie bin to be replaced with anti-racist Afghani rape rats.
This exchange is so revealing. Kenyon points out the obvious - that the more people that enter a country, the more houses that country will need. But upon hearing the argument that immigration puts pressure on the housing supply, the Green candidate immediately defaults to her "I'm shocked and horrified you could ever say such a thing!" mode. The funny thing is, she ends up agreeing with him, but even then she tries to pretend he has said something appalling. This is what happens when politics is rooted in feelings rather than facts.
We should retire the phrase "two-tier policing." Not because it's not true - as per official police materials, it pretty clearly is - but because it goes nowhere near far enough.
When you look at tragedies like the death of Henry Nowak and try to capture it with a term like "two-tier policing", you end up inadvertently masking a vast constitutional catastrophe underneath a complaint about general procedure, something a review and a reworded leaflet can put right.
What happened to Nowak is a single visible outcrop of something far larger and far worse: the capture, one institution at a time, of the British state by the belief-system of a particular class. It is something to which the public are, slowly-but-surely, awakening, but it's well short of the reckoning it requires.
After all, we have a word for people who steal from an institution. We call it corruption - it is endemic in British public life, by the way - and we know what to do about it. But we have no working word for the thing that is worse: an ideology quietly replacing an institution's reason for existing. A virus of the institutional mind, a toxin of the institutional soul.
A police force exists to protect the public. But a captured police force exists to advertise its own virtue, and will leave the public to bleed on a pavement to do it. You needn't take this on faith: they wrote it down. The police's own Race Action Plan states, in black and white, that equal treatment is the very thing it has set itself against. The institution rewrote its purpose and published the confession, though it expects your submission, rather than your forgiveness.
Nowak's death is the product of that inversion. An officer trained to treat the accusation of racism as the most urgent fact in the room met a dying boy and a lying killer and performed exactly as trained. Nothing has malfunctioned here, nothing at all. The system did precisely what it is now built to do.
And it's not one rogue patrol, either, though the truculence of the Hampshire police commissioner in the face of his officers' malfeasance might tempt you to think otherwise. The same disease runs through institutions with nothing else in common.
Consider William Shawcross' review of Prevent, which found a counter-terror system so warped by fear of the word "Islamophobia" that barely a fifth of its referrals concerned Islamism, while four-fifths of live terror investigations did: an apparatus that exists to see the threat, trained not to look at it. Closer to home, we all know how forces now log tens of thousands of "non-crime hate incidents" - speech that broke no law - while most actual thefts end without a suspect even being sought. Captured institutions keep working. They simply pour their effort into whatever the creed rewards.
None of this is mysterious. Robert Conquest's old law holds that any institution not deliberately kept to its purpose drifts, sooner or later, toward the reigning orthodoxy. Bolt onto that a personnel machine - the diversity directorate, the recruitment that quietly screens for the right opinions - that makes careers out of professing the creed and ends them for doubting it, and the capture becomes self-sealing, because the captured now do the hiring.
What turns this from a blunder into a betrayal is who holds the beliefs and who pays for them. These are what Rob Henderson calls luxury beliefs, and beneath them sits the truth Christopher Lasch named thirty years ago in The Revolt of the Elites: a credentialed class that has seceded from the common life and no longer shares the nation's fate. The beliefs are status markers, costless to the people who profess them, because that class is insulated by the good postcode and the private option from every consequence of what it believes. The bill falls entirely on the people without the buffers - the boy stabbed on a night out, the girl in a town the council won't name being pimped around a circuit of cab drivers who may well be flying their cousins in from overseas to join in their activities.
A doctrine experienced as compassion by the people who hold it that is paid for in the blood of the people who don't.
And when one of those victims dies on camera, the same class looks the country in the eye and tells you that the thing you have just watched didn't happen, and that to have noticed it is the real bigotry.
There's no point talking about reviews or inquiries. We're passed that point. If you want this to stop, you need to be thinking about institutional recapture. We need to commit people, means, and time to the task of hauling each institution back to the job it was built for:
- The police to protect
- The courts to judge on the evidence according to law delivered by a mandated parliament
- Local councils devoted to matters of local import, rather than those which spend their times siphoning away procurement funds and pontificating on matters of obscure foreign policy
...and restoring the most unfashionable principle left in British life, that the state is blind to who you are and answerable only to the truth. Equality before the law is part of the great inheritance we have bequeathed the world, and it has been taken from us on purpose, by people convinced they knew better.
It was taken from us because we were too weak. It is our disgrace and a blotch on our history. But we can return it to ourselves, and return it we must.
I love @CharlotteCGill work - she does a fantastic job of showing up the absolute belters of woke leftie public sector nonsense…all paid for by us taxpayers. She should be given a medal……….and a flamethrower to get rid of this blight on the nation.
Florence Schechter (left), the founder of The Vagina Museum - who is now Hackney Council’s Cabinet Member for Finance, Resident Services and Digital - with the new Mayor of Hackney Zoe Garbett: