College sports & recruiting expert. Guiding athletes to best-fit colleges and helping schools retain and attract talent. Former college coach. HS Hoops Coach
Legal only beginning. Here's what worries me: may cost some of class of '26 their offers and their playing time. Plus with roster caps already, athletes already stuck in portal may have nowhere to land unless the NCAA lifts caps like during COVID. #TransferPortal#RecruitUTips
I coached at this level. So when an Ohio judge granted injunction against NCAA's new 5-in-5 eligibility rule granting 24 D1 athletes a 5th year AND the right to transfer outside the portal window — I felt for these as well as current and incoming athletes. NCAA says it'll fight.
Alot of coverage of NCAA's new 5-in-5 rule. Except what was left out. 1 time transfer limit was in but they dropped it. This was most direct path to more recruiting opportunities for high school athletes. Full picture and how Congress can save it: https://t.co/GYSxNYrgZd
Really enjoyed this conversation with @PrepAthletics on the post-grad prep school path for college-bound athletes.
It's a misunderstood option in recruiting - and for the right athlete, it can be a difference maker.
🎙️ Watch below 👇
#CollegeRecruiting#StudentAthletes#RecruitU
SEC and Big Ten opposing the Protect College Sports Act is greed personified. But watch what happens to Rutgers, Maryland, Arkansas, MS State. You don't protect college sports by richest strip-mining it. Their avarice will implode themselves as well.
https://t.co/vOnuWjdG2n
Do fans want the same 20 schools competing for championships every year?
Where do SEC & Big Ten swimmers, wrestlers & gymnasts compete if they break away?
Nobody's answering that. I did.
https://t.co/VCwYJwvmdC
#NCAA#NIL#CollegeSports
Alabama @UA_Athletics giving DeBoer a $2M annual raise is another example of a college negotiating against itself and throwing millions away - while at the same time cutting roster slots in Olympic sports...Brutal @AlabamaFTBL
Important breakdown from RecruitU on proposed NCAA eligibility changes.
Most are only seeing surface-level “opportunity increase” angle.
Real impact is how timing, reclassing, and eligibility windows will fundamentally change recruiting.
👇
https://t.co/Nz1aM8uJ85
Proposed rule changes from the NCAA could increase recruiting opportunities for high school athletes.
But the full impact—and risks—aren’t being fully discussed.
Here’s what athletes, parents, and coaches need to understand 👇
Most are missing real impact of NCAA’s proposed eligibility changes.
It’s not just about transfers but fundamental changes:
• HS recruiting opportunities and timing
• Reclass decisions
• Prep school pathways
https://t.co/Nz1aM8uJ85
Transfer restrictions in today’s college sports environment are a bigger issue than people realize.
Athletes are signing NIL deals that can be reduced or canceled.
If they get pushed out and can’t transfer freely, they’re stuck—with no leverage.
That’s a real risk.
The biggest issue here isn’t being talked about enough—
You can’t restrict athletes AND refuse to negotiate with them.
That’s why this isn’t leading to stability.
It’s leading to more lawsuits, more spending, and more schools getting left behind.
Coaches like Will Wade walk after scandal. Athletes get sued for transferring (hello University of Georgia).
No union. No leverage. Bad NIL contracts everywhere.
The people generating the money have no seat at the table.
It’s not reform. It’s exploitation.
#CollegeAthleteRights
No athletes invited to Trump's Saving College Sports Roundtable or on his new committee on college sports.
Zero.
So let’s be clear — this isn’t about “saving” college sports.
It’s about controlling it...and exploiting student athletes.
#NIL#CollegeSports#AthleteRights
In typical Power 4 fashion, Ohio State negotiates against itself to give DC Patricia a raise to $3.75M. This after cutting roster cap in sports like men's swimming below NCAA limit to feed the football beast. I'm surprised they can spell "The" @OhioStateFB@OhioStAthletics
The Trump “Saving College Sports” roundtable included admins, power brokers, and politicians — but no college athlete reps. Again, those performing, generating revenue, and taking the physical and financial risk had no seat at the table. Hard to call that reform.