In 1972 while working at NIAID, we identified for the first time the SV40 ori. I never imagined its evil potential 50 years later.
@Kevin_McKernan@Fynnderella1@DrHarveyRisch@RWMaloneMD@btysonmd@drcraigwax@DoctorCole@joevaron@Honest_Medicine
“Origin and Direction of Simian Virus 40 Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication” Authors: George C. Fareed, Claude F. Garon, Norman P. Salzman Journal of Virology, September 1972, Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 484–491. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.10.3.484-491.1972 PMCID: PMC356490 | PMID: 4342055
Abstract (full from sources)
Double-branched, circular, replicating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules of simian virus 40 (SV40) have been cleaved by the R1 restriction endonuclease from Escherichia coli. This enzyme introduces one double-strand break in SV40 DNA, at a specific site. The site of cleavage in the replicating molecules was used in this study to position the origin and the two branch points. Radioactively labeled molecules fractionated according to their extent of replication were evaluated after cleavage by sedimentation analysis and electron microscopy. The results demonstrate that the R1 cleavage site is 33% of the genome length from the origin of replication and that both branch points are growing points. These data indicate that SV40 DNA replication is bidirectional and confirm other reports which have shown a unique origin of replication.
Key Findings
•SV40 DNA replication starts at a unique origin.
•Replication proceeds bidirectionally from that origin (both forks are active growing points).
•The R1 restriction site (a single cut) is located ~33% of the genome length from the origin, helping map the positions.
This paper was published alongside a closely related one in the same issue: “Specific Initiation Site for Simian Virus 40 Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication” by Thoren, Sebring, and Salzman (pages 462–468), which also supported a specific (non-random) initiation site.
Access Links
•Journal site (ASM): https://t.co/Bzz9pqJiMs (includes PDF download option and a correction note from a later issue).
•PMC (free full text likely available): https://t.co/GLwQUvxlGz or PDF at https://t.co/HkihpGo56a.
•PubMed: https://t.co/FoQP0J2Hb2
For over a century, they've known vaccines cause sudden infant deaths—yet each time proof emerged, they relentlessly hid it & blamed parents.
Here, I reveal all the buried evidence vaccines kill infants and the hospital data which explains how it happens.
https://t.co/HTM9dFmJcc
REMEMBER 🚨: when these 3 idiots told us “the science is clear”
“These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease”
Humiliating!
They LIED to your face...
They said it with straight faces while pushing mandates, lockdowns, and shots on the entire world:
- Fauci: “When people are vaccinated they’re not going to get infected.”
- Biden: “You’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.”
- CDC Director Walensky: “Vaccinated people do not carry the virus and don’t get sick.”
- Rachel Maddow: “Now we know the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops.”
- Bill Gates: “The vaccine is reducing their transmission.”
- Pfizer CEO Bourla: “There is no variant that escapes the protection of our vaccines.”
They knew.
They said it anyway.
And they used your fear, your job, your kids’ future, and your body to force compliance.
This wasn’t a mistake.
This was coordinated deception on a global scale.
If they lied this blatantly about infection and transmission…
What else did they lie about?
The truth is out.
The damage is already done.
NFL quarterback Jim Miller used DMSO from a horse farm to play seasons through injuries the league's painkillers couldn't fix. He's not the only one — pro athletes have quietly used it for decades while the FDA refuses to approve it.
But DMSO isn't just for pro athletes. It has an 80-90% success rate for musculoskeletal injuries and chronic pain, with thousands of patients documented across decades of clinical use and thousands more readers reporting identical results. Most importantly, unlike NSAIDs and opioids which kill tens of thousands of Americans annually, DMSO has never been linked to a single death.🧵
The FDA was derelict in their duty to investigate the hundreds of safety signal from the Covid vaccines, but they partook in
-Truancy
-Masking
-Filtering
In order to neutralize these data.
They Ran Nattokinase Against a Statin. The Enzyme Won.
A landmark randomized trial put a fermented-soybean enzyme head-to-head with simvastatin — and on the one measure that predicts heart attacks and strokes, the pennies-a-day enzyme shrank plaque more than three times as much as the drug.
https://t.co/0zoSZCpF6O
Long overdue. Thank you @Kevin_McKernan for this new development. I know what it takes to validate new methodologies and it’s very costly and time consuming. Important thread!
I was fully supportive of Asilomar 1975 which became forgotten totally by Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci and all their conspirators who created the COVID-19 genome.
@Fynnderella1@btysonmd@DoctorCole@RWMaloneMD@DrHarveyRisch@SenRonJohnson@SecKennedy@DoctorCole@P_McCulloughMD@Honest_Medicine@PierreKory
The Asilomar Conference 1975 was held in February 1975 at the Asilomar Conference Center in California. Scientists, including Paul Berg, got together with lawyers and others to tackle the biohazards of recombinant DNA technology, which was brand new and scary at the time.
The purpose was to assess the risks of splicing DNA from different organisms, decide whether to lift a voluntary moratorium on certain experiments, and establish voluntary safety guidelines so research could continue without creating dangerous pathogens or uncontainable organisms. They focused on containment levels, physical and biological, and basically set the blueprint for safe biotech work that influenced NIH guidelines the next year.
It wasn’t about inventing the technology — that was happening in labs a few years earlier — but about managing its risks responsibly before things got out of hand. Pretty forward-thinking for the time.
In 1972 while working at NIAID, we identified for the first time the SV40 ori. I never imagined its evil potential 50 years later.
@Kevin_McKernan@Fynnderella1@DrHarveyRisch@RWMaloneMD@btysonmd@drcraigwax@DoctorCole@joevaron@Honest_Medicine
“Origin and Direction of Simian Virus 40 Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication” Authors: George C. Fareed, Claude F. Garon, Norman P. Salzman Journal of Virology, September 1972, Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 484–491. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.10.3.484-491.1972 PMCID: PMC356490 | PMID: 4342055
Abstract (full from sources)
Double-branched, circular, replicating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules of simian virus 40 (SV40) have been cleaved by the R1 restriction endonuclease from Escherichia coli. This enzyme introduces one double-strand break in SV40 DNA, at a specific site. The site of cleavage in the replicating molecules was used in this study to position the origin and the two branch points. Radioactively labeled molecules fractionated according to their extent of replication were evaluated after cleavage by sedimentation analysis and electron microscopy. The results demonstrate that the R1 cleavage site is 33% of the genome length from the origin of replication and that both branch points are growing points. These data indicate that SV40 DNA replication is bidirectional and confirm other reports which have shown a unique origin of replication.
Key Findings
•SV40 DNA replication starts at a unique origin.
•Replication proceeds bidirectionally from that origin (both forks are active growing points).
•The R1 restriction site (a single cut) is located ~33% of the genome length from the origin, helping map the positions.
This paper was published alongside a closely related one in the same issue: “Specific Initiation Site for Simian Virus 40 Deoxyribonucleic Acid Replication” by Thoren, Sebring, and Salzman (pages 462–468), which also supported a specific (non-random) initiation site.
Access Links
•Journal site (ASM): https://t.co/Bzz9pqJiMs (includes PDF download option and a correction note from a later issue).
•PMC (free full text likely available): https://t.co/GLwQUvxlGz or PDF at https://t.co/HkihpGo56a.
•PubMed: https://t.co/FoQP0J2Hb2
I was fully supportive of Asilomar 1975 which became forgotten totally by Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci and all their conspirators who created the COVID-19 genome.
@Fynnderella1@btysonmd@DoctorCole@RWMaloneMD@DrHarveyRisch@SenRonJohnson@SecKennedy@DoctorCole@P_McCulloughMD@Honest_Medicine@PierreKory
The Asilomar Conference 1975 was held in February 1975 at the Asilomar Conference Center in California. Scientists, including Paul Berg, got together with lawyers and others to tackle the biohazards of recombinant DNA technology, which was brand new and scary at the time.
The purpose was to assess the risks of splicing DNA from different organisms, decide whether to lift a voluntary moratorium on certain experiments, and establish voluntary safety guidelines so research could continue without creating dangerous pathogens or uncontainable organisms. They focused on containment levels, physical and biological, and basically set the blueprint for safe biotech work that influenced NIH guidelines the next year.
It wasn’t about inventing the technology — that was happening in labs a few years earlier — but about managing its risks responsibly before things got out of hand. Pretty forward-thinking for the time.
I finally got Grok to admit that in the Hooker study, the vaccine caused the increased deaths hypothesis was 6 times more likely than a confounder caused it.
So the odds are strong that vaccines are killing our kids. You do believe Grok, don't you???
https://t.co/GoL196Oggr
Severe brain fog, psychiatric illness and accelerated dementia are some of the saddest but most common vaccine injuries I see-especially since no one believes them.
The data now proves the vaccines double the rates of these conditions. Here how to fix it
https://t.co/tPSrfXPblo