I formally criticize Trump and distance myself from him regarding his alienation of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. A Christian nation being alienated by a President of a Christian nation is a shattering of a close relationship.
I stand by my view that Pope Leo should have also included Iran’s injustices directly along with the US War. This would have been a full call to peace.
We are to question or challenge our spiritual leaders through discernment, not necessarily the position itself.
I stand by my assessment of Trump’s post that “supposedly” depicted him as Jesus. I am still reserved on my objective final decision to call it blasphemy.
I will not make accusations without proof. I have called and will continue to call for the full release of the Epstein Files to expose who is lying and who is not. This will reveal who received preferential treatment based on wealth and who financed Epstein’s operation. I would also encourage and advocate for additional prosecutions to follow the release. A few Republicans share the same sentiment.
That if Trump is deemed guilty by the courts, he should be removed or step down.
It is important for victim testimony, as stated by prosecutors. Currently, none are directly at Trump.
#releasetheunredactedepsteinfiles
#releaseEpsteinfiles
Note: I did not state that I no longer support Trump. He is simply the current President. I will continue to be a Republican. I am entitled to my own views, opinions, and assessments.
As I have previously stated, I did not approve of Biden’s presidency, but he was still our President, and I will maintain the view of America First then, as I do now. Even when Trump is no longer President
Note: I did not state that I no longer support Trump. He is simply the current President. I will continue to be a Republican. I am entitled to my own views, opinions, and assessments.
As I have previously stated, I did not approve of Biden’s presidency, but he was still our President, and I will maintain the view of America First then, as I do now. Even when Trump is no longer President.
@KJisms@SteveRob I appreciated the great conversation as well. Very informative, engaging and with open dialogue. Thank you. The reaction or response certainly should also be done in a way (constitutionally) that sets the stage for the future decisions.
@KJisms@SteveRob I have reviewed that information and appreciate your sharing. One of the primary reasons why it is crucial to safeguard against activist judgeships is that it is a lifelong career path, and the process for impeachment and discipline for violations is arduous.
@KJisms@SteveRob Indeed, I concur that moderating our pace and allowing ourselves ample time to fully comprehend the intricacies of a situation would be highly beneficial.
@KJisms@SteveRob In this context, it is important to note that prosecutors frequently cite the judges’ previous rulings or those of higher courts to bolster their arguments.
@KJisms@SteveRob Yes, it can show up in rulings, especially over a period of time. Impeachment or Discipline is required for removal. This is career appointment.
Black’s Law Dictionary defines judicial activism as a “philosophy of judicial decision-making whereby judges allow their personal views on public policy, among other factors, to influence their decisions.”
* A judge may be considered potentially compromised by association with an activist, particularly if they share similar ideologies.
** Therefore, a prospective candidate should not be considered for the role.
@Sassafrass_84 Virginian’s, can work to repeal laws through their elected representatives in the General Assembly, or pursue a court-led removal of officials for neglect of duty.
@KJisms@SteveRob It doesn’t matter if a judge is gay, but an activist judge gay or straight ect… shouldn’t be on a bench. They need to be impeached if their rulings are deemed to be in violation of their oaths.
Judicial rulings must adhere to constitutional requirements. Judges are mandated to maintain impartiality and refrain from issuing decisions that may be perceived as biased or influenced by external factors.
Regardless of anyone’s view outside the courtroom. These rulings affect the general public!!!!