Gerva Figueroa

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@ZachWeiner Yeah, but we made the AI, maybe we just suck at making them.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@ZachWeiner @steuard This type of machine can't exist, but its non-existence depends only on logic, not physics, so it would be independent of the laws of physics under which we live.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@ZachWeiner @steuard Maybe something forbidden by logic but not necessarily physics, for example a machine which could understand and answer any question truthfully (it would also know if it has a truth value at all), I think this would contradict the decision problem.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@ZachWeiner I guess all objects would be Gabriel's horns (if by that you mean finite volume and infinite surface) if you assume you can measure arbitrarily small things, I don't think that's the case when taking quantom mechanics into account though.

[Dev-Artemis Animation @DevilArtemisX]

Morning y’all.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@squigglymips @ZachWeiner Yeah, but there are more false statements than true statements, so odds are in favor of you being wrong.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@re4hdproject Habrá que terminar este juego por octava vez

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@AcademicsSay It doesn't specify you choose one at random from the 4 presented, so it could be any real number, and the probability of choosing a specific number at random from the real set is 0.

[Gerva Figueroa @GervaF99]

@ZachWeiner The T-annihilator