Benjamin Ghanney

🧑‍🔧🌱⚙️🦾🚘⚡️🔋🌍

[Miliano 🇮🇹 @Barcosmalls]

YOU CAN'T COMPARE GODS YOU CAN ONLY CHOOSE YOUR RELIGION ☯️🐐

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

Boys sexually abused who were abused at a very young age look and appear to be the most toughest but they are the most traumatised and very weak inward. And these boy child abuse is rapidly increasing but it seems no one is concerned or there is an agenda to destroy the boy child

[SKB @seyikanbai]

“At 6 years, I was s3xually abused by my mom’s friend, then I was sent to Africa to learn discipline. At 7, I started smoking. At 8, I started dealing drugs. At 12, I was adopted.” 💔

— Dele Alli

[Ghana Man Ideas @GhanaManIdeas]

He went to watch a parliamentary sitting, this was his observation.

This is how the next generation sees its leaders

Even the kids know we have incredibly incompetent leadership

[#TheSportsIlluminator @RayToluAyo]

I stormed on this article on Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi

I want you to read it, it's another angle entirely

I picked this part from it

"When Messi lost finals, and he lost several, badly, in ways that seemed to break him, he didn’t disappear quietly. He threw tantrums. He cried in front of the cameras.

"He threatened to quit. And the people around him came to him every time. What do you need? Come back. We’re still here

"That’s a man who grew up knowing that love doesn’t leave when you fail. He could fall apart because he had always been caught."

"Ronaldo, when he loses, goes inward. He blames himself when it goes wrong. He credits himself when it goes right.

"He expects everyone else to run the same internal economy.

And that expectation, formed in a household where a child had to be the engine of his own family’s survival, is both the source of everything he achieved and the wall he keeps running into"

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@Ayussheth Hi

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

I read this and couldn’t help thinking that this is far deeper than it sounds. Even I often say, “Jesus saved me,” without fully grasping the depth of what that truly means.

As a young Uni debater, I fell in love with a concept called the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Here’s the setup: Two prisoners are interrogated separately. If both stay silent, they get light sentences. If one betrays, the betrayer goes free while the other gets maximum time. If both betray, both get heavy sentences.

The rational move? Betray first. Don’t risk being the one left holding the bag. Protect yourself before trusting the other.

This logic runs everywhere, relationships, business, politics. The question is always: Who moves first? Who takes the risk? Who trusts without guarantee?

Normal human calculus says: “I’ll give if they give. I’ll trust if they prove trustworthy. I’ll sacrifice if I know it won’t be wasted.” We always want leverage. Assurance before vulnerability.

Then there’s Jesus Christ.

The Bible says He is “the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world” (Revelation 13:8). Before creation. Before sin. Before humanity had a chance to reject or accept Him, the decision was made.

Think about that. God looked at the entire scope of human history, knowing we all have free will, knowing many would reject Him, knowing the cost, and still chose the Cross.

Christ was going to die anyway. Even if everyone rejected Him. Even if no one accepted. That was the risk He took. He didn’t wait. He didn’t hedge. He didn’t demand proof of loyalty.

He just died.

Normal human logic asks: “What if I die and they don’t accept it? Shouldn’t they prove themselves first?” Christ didn’t care for leverage. He moved first. Unconditionally and irrevocably.

He broke the dilemma.

That’s scandalous, at least in my eyes. Because the logic of self-preservation, the logic that governs how we negotiate, trust, and love, assumes vulnerability must be calculated. Christ obliterated that assumption. He gave first. Loved first. Died first.

Now the question isn’t, “Will God love me if I get it right?” The real question imo is: What do you do with a God who already went all in?

Gabriel Jesus gets it: “Jesus saved my life from the beginning, when I was born, I didn’t know it yet.”

Grace isn’t reactive. It isn’t conditional. It arrives before your awareness, before your response, before your yes.
That’s the scandal: He moved first, and He didn’t flinch.

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@PopeZoi_ @TheDumbTechGuy That's our habit we move from typewriter to MacBook no intermediate 😂

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@f_kwophy Why is everyone blaming him?😂 he is just the chairman of the committee not the minister nor the deputy

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

According to Hon. Collins Dauda, the typical royalty rate for a mining lease or license is 5% of their total revenue. In 2025 we are still making such deals but all we care to discuss about is Wesley girls and Muslims 😂

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@CNY_Anderson 😂😂

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

Let them breathe, their parents can decide to give everything to charity 😂

[Ms. Christine Anderson @CNY_Anderson]

“It is my parents who are rich. I am not rich.” Mtchewwww

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@CNY_Anderson Anything is possible 😂

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@kwekuaboagye5 @DouglaslionT @SaddickAdams It's simple, just give him the job 😂

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@cheeseqake1 @__ddodoo 💯

[Elena Song 🤯 @elenasongsong]

My mom goes to elderly university for free in China. It is probably the best thing they have done for elderly. She likes it so much. You can take any subject you like, no exam, no certificate, just learning for fun. She’s now learning gardening, music, philosophy, and some geopolitics. There are farmers travelling all the way to the school everyday to learn. This is 1000x better than stupid elderly home which basically kill elderly quickly rather than care.

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@CNY_Anderson My thoughts all day

[Mr. Possible @Mrpossidez]

No bro, your take is not rigorous enough and you’re missing my point. There is something fundamentally wrong with turning an impulse into a principle. The impulse to judge people by their looks is pre-rational. It’s a flicker of instinct, a biological alert system reacting to novelty, difference, or perceived threat. It is automatic and unchosen. A principle, on the other hand, is post-rational. It’s a deliberate, conscious rule you endorse as a lens through which to interpret the world. To collapse the former into the latter is very silly. You cannot canonize an impulse because an impulse hasn’t yet passed through the filters of scrutiny, context, or moral responsibility.

When you see someone dressed in an unusual way, your mind sends a signal that something is “off.” That is not judgment. That is a nervous system reacting to unfamiliar data. The mature response is to suspend that reaction long enough for reason to intervene, leaving space to evaluate the person on their actual merits. It’s the same distinction between having thoughts and thinking. Thousands of thoughts pass through the mind each day but they only become judgments when you endorse them.

This is how you confront racism, tribalism, bigotry, or any other form of instinctive bias. You cannot say “judge people by how they look,” because that turns a reflex into a rule. Judgment is a conscious act. It’s an imposition of your prejudice onto someone else. And if we were all judged immediately and absolutely by appearance, none of us would benefit. By the same logic, the state would be justified in arresting you on sight simply because your appearance deviates from someone’s personal standard of “conventional.” That is the absurdity this thinking leads to.

In a multicultural, heterogeneous world, our minds are constantly making micro-assessments about appearance, tone, posture, belief temperament etc. But these subtle assessments are not judgments; they are intuitions. They are invitations to investigate further, not permissions to conclude.

Also, judgments based on appearances are the worst of all judgments. The range is extreme and the margin of error is catastrophic. Appearance is the least reliable proxy for character because it reflects the conditions of a person far more than the constitution of a person. It tells you what they could afford, what they inherited, what their culture normalizes, what their anxieties mask, or what their aesthetics prefer, not who they are, what they value, or how they behave.

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@TheresaArueyin1 Daniel

[Victor Okafor @TheVictorOkafor]

Age 21-26? Probably the most important video you’ll watch this year. I’m rooting for you. Heavy.

❤️⏰

[Benjamin Ghanney @GhanneyBe]

@Nassss224 @CallmeAlfredo True but the reality is our politicians dont care about tomorrow, the care about the now.