Our hearts are shattered.
Emerging from the holy fast of Yom Kippur, British Jews are now grasping the full extent of today’s terror attack at the Heaton Park Synagogue in Manchester.
This is the day we hoped we would never see, but which deep down, we knew would come.
For so long we have witnessed an unrelenting wave of Jew hatred on our streets, on campuses, on social media and elsewhere – this is the tragic result.
This not only an assault on the Jewish community, but an attack on the very foundations of humanity and the values of compassion, dignity and respect which we all share.
I have spoken this evening to Rabbi Daniel Walker, the spiritual leader of the Heaton Park Synagogue. His courageous leadership, together with the resilience of his congregation, are an inspiration to us all.
May the victims’ memories be for a blessing and may the injured be granted a swift recovery.
I pray that this tragedy strengthens our collective resolve to confront antisemitism, in all its guises, once and for all.
@jeremy_gans In crime in particular there is an astonishing amount of old CLR/ NSWLR cases that are not freely available online. I assume it’s also a security issue to sent court staff down hyperlinks? One can, using some file/word magic, hyperlink into the authorities bundle, but not perfect
@jeremy_gans Authorities bundles are really just the non-digital analogue of this, and presumably stop a lot of this occurring in hearings where they are used by the parties or required by the Court. They are more common for final hearings than interlocutory matters, I gather.
@jeremy_gans@DominicVillaSC I’ve always thought that ‘offend’ fits oddly in a list with ‘intimidate’ or ‘humiliate’. Reasonable people can be (and are) offended by an enormous variety of conduct which goes nowhere near intimidation or humiliation. Whether that suggests a narrow or broad reading is arguable.
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum might say that it does not make a practical difference whether they are acting against interests generally, or in the specific respect they are retained for. That's a fine view, but one on which we'd have to disagree. (2/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum The difference in degree is not about feelings of betrayal, but about the extent to which the professional has acted against their client's interests in respect of the specific purpose for which they are retained. We clearly disagree about whether that is relevant; you... (1/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum That’s not what I asserted. The answer, though, is that whilst informing *may* be against the mental health interests of the client of a psychiatrist, it is almost always going to be against the legal interests of a client of a barrister. It’s simply a difference in degree.
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum I think it is sensible that if you engage someone for a particular purpose, anything they do which is directly against that purpose is particularly bad, as opposed to against your interests generally. It's not the end of debate; just another factor to consider. (2/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum I think the important distinction is that it is against the *legal interests* of the client. Anything a psychiatrist does against the mental health interests of their client is particularly egregious, because they are sought out for the purpose of improving mental health. (1/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum to her clients and of EF's duties to the court." Just as a doctor's domain is health, the Barrister's domain is the law, and anything done against legal interests of the client is especially bad. (https://t.co/1jrfQ63Y5Z) (2/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum I think the domain specific issues cross over and aggravates the general distastefulness of the breach of confidence and fiduciary duties. I can't possibly put it better than the High Court did; they were "fundamental and appalling breaches of EF's obligations as counsel... (1/2)
@jeremy_gans@BarristerBaum Isn’t part of this domain specific? Your *lawyer* informing, and therefore placing you and your associates in greater legal ‘danger’ is more akin to your doctor stabbing you, or your accountant stealing your money etc. It’s a fundamental breach of their specific purpose.
#EXCLUSIVE: Australians suffering rare diseases have been delivered a lifeline, with two breakthrough medicines becoming available for free this month. @Fi_Willan#9News
Honoured to announce that our Govt will expand the PBS listing of the medicine Kalydeco for infants, helping children living with Cystic Fibrosis like Scarlett from Hobart. It will save families up to $300,000 a year, taking it down to as little as $6.50 a script
@CFAustralia
There are calls for young people to undergo free genetic testing to find out whether they're likely to develop cancer and other chronic conditions. Advocates say it will dramatically reduce the strain on the health system and save lives. #7NEWS
He had a unique ability to speak to all Australians and will be greatly missed.
My thoughts and deepest sympathies are with Bob’s widow Blanche and his family. May he Rest In Peace.
Bob Hawke was a great Australian who led and served our country with passion, courage, and an intellectual horsepower that made our country stronger.
He was true to his beliefs in the Labor tradition and defined the politics of his generation and beyond.
In the span of a single week:
* The French government announces that anti-Semitic incidents are up 74%
* The German government announces that violent anti-Semitic attacks are up 60%
* Seven British MPs leave the Labour Party due to "institutional anti-Semitism"
Europe, wake up.