As calls to arms go, this is hysterically badly timed. It could only look worse if he was swigging champagne and eating pheasant while he was saying it.
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg Fuck off. We need to let you know our children will only be fighting one war. And that is against the enemy you and you ilk have allowed into the country. Send the migrants. Its time for them to prove their Britishness
The show in Brum passed off without incident
My thanks to all who posted support. I think that may have changed some minds
A British publisher had asked me to write a book on Islamic humour
However, they want a first draft by tomorrow
I told them I could do that
@maestro1886@BProudPatriot Colostomy bag with a side prescription of diversity rape. Delightful thing to look forward to.
Hopefully buy the time I need all that mass remigration will have happened. Or I'll go private
🚨 NHS 🧵 continued.
Foreign Doctors, Facts, and the NHS: Why Ignoring the Data Endangers Patients
The evidence is uncomfortable, but it’s not debatable. In 2019, a *Mail on Sunday* investigation — later reported by *Asian Voice* — revealed a stark reality: foreign-trained doctors, who at the time made up roughly one-third of NHS medics, were responsible for **60% of proven sexual misconduct cases** against patients. That’s 23 out of 38 disciplinary findings over three years, including allegations of rape and sexual assault.
This wasn’t a smear. It came straight from General Medical Council (GMC) data obtained via Freedom of Information. Fast-forward and the pattern hasn’t vanished. International medical graduates (IMGs) still show elevated rates of fitness-to-practise referrals and concerns compared to UK-trained doctors. Add in documented cases of falsified qualifications — like the psychiatrist who practised for 20 years on forged credentials — and gaps in international vetting that let doctors struck off abroad slip through, and the picture sharpens.
Yet large parts of the political and media class treat any discussion of these disparities as taboo. Point out the overrepresentation and you’re accused of “ideology.” Demand higher standards for patient safety and you’re labelled intolerant or racist. The same selective blindness applies to broader immigration outcomes. Official data on Pakistani and Bangladeshi heritage communities (around 3.4% of the population) shows persistent low employment rates (61% combined), significantly higher child benefit claims, elevated preventable NHS admissions from diabetes and heart disease, and disproportionate involvement in certain crime categories — including the grooming gang scandals exposed in Rotherham, Rochdale, and beyond. The 2025 Casey National Audit confirmed what local inquiries had already shown: men of Pakistani ethnicity were heavily overrepresented in group-based child sexual exploitation cases where ethnicity was recorded.
None of this means every individual from these backgrounds is a problem. But policy isn’t made on individuals — it’s made on patterns, costs, and risks. The NHS relies heavily on overseas recruitment because we’ve chronically under-trained domestic doctors. That creates real trade-offs. When a subset of recruits correlates with higher rates of serious misconduct, welfare dependency, and public safety burdens, pretending otherwise isn’t compassion — it’s negligence.
The counterfactual is simple. Remove the net fiscal and social drag from the lowest-performing cohorts and you free up billions in welfare, prison places, and NHS bed-days without collapsing the system. Domestic training pipelines can and should be expanded to reduce reliance on any single high-volume source country. Credential checks MUST be tightened with proper primary-source verification and information-sharing. English proficiency and cultural competency around professional boundaries aren’t optional extras.
The real ideology at play isn’t the one noticing the numbers — it’s the one that dismisses them. For years we’ve been told that diversity in the NHS is an unqualified good, that disparities are always the fault of “systemic racism,” and that questioning recruitment standards is somehow bigoted. The 2019 GMC figures, the grooming inquiries, the employment data, and the preventable health burdens all say otherwise.
Patients deserve protection first. Taxpayers deserve honesty about costs. And the public deserves a medical workforce selected on merit, safety, and integration — not political signalling. Facts don’t care about narratives. It’s time policy didn’t either. Pattern recognition isn’t racist. They don’t care about your feelings.
It is extraordinary that clerics and scholars who have been banned in Muslim countries are allowed to 'preach' here
Could it be that the Home Secretary is a Muslim, whose religion hinders her attempts to be even-handed ?
@TheophilePeter@RomanBollock@JaydaBF Not resides. Being born here to foreigners makes you a foreigner. There is no birthright citizenship unless your parents have citizenship. We are going to change that to native citizenship though. Its too loose
@TheophilePeter@JaydaBF Depends on what nationality his parents decide to give him. Italian or Albanian and thats where he'll be from. he could be duel & be from both.
But he'll never be from England. Even if his gggg grandparents weren't born in Italy or Albania, he'll never be English. Its impossible
@GingerWooWoo@Gaziskhan777@gingerrtom Not until England is colonised and their people enslaved and their resources robbed. A couple of centuries of this first.
@IslaamWinsAgain@Gaziskhan777@gingerrtom You can't achieve that. You barely lasted 40 years here and your blood is about to spill.
You are outnumbered. Outflanked. Its over. Nice try though.
If you weren't such a low IQ, low impulse control, inbred sub species, you might have managed it. 🤣🤣
@TheGhostSleepi1 Far too late for that. We must be 95% native at all times from now on. The 5% must be carefully picked from green list countries and bring massive benefits to the natives.
@k1003944@BProudPatriot What about when we start closing the mosques, ban halal, cousin marriage, sharia courts and the burqa? What about when stop all benefits to nons?
What about when islamaphobia is redefined as islamosceptism, and made legal?