Gregorio

Aerospace / Real Estate / Tech

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

Knowledge brings pain.

WISDOM reveals joy.

[Ed Latimore @EdLatimore]

"For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow."

Ecclesiastes 1:18

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Remember, each of these countries once had their own cultures and traditions before Islam.

[Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק @Ofer_binshtok]

Question: Do Muslim Immigrants Who Take the Oath of Allegiance to the United States to Obtain Citizenship Commit Fraud, as Proven in This Document Based on the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad, and Should Their Citizenship Be Revoked?

By: Ofer binshtok

Main Claim:
A Muslim immigrant who takes the Oath of Allegiance to the United States to obtain citizenship commits fraud (taqiyya), as they falsely declare full loyalty to U.S. laws while being obligated to exclusive loyalty to the deen (way of life) of the Quran, Muhammad, and the Islamic Ummah, as part of jihad to promote Islam, undermine the U.S. from within, and establish Sharia law over its citizens. Their citizenship is obtained through deception, and therefore, it should be revoked under U.S. law, which considers a false declaration a basis for denaturalization.

On One Hand: The Oath of Allegiance Under U.S. Law

The Oath of Allegiance is a legal requirement for any immigrant seeking to become a U.S. citizen, as stipulated in Section 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The text of the oath, as provided by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), is as follows:

Text of the Oath:
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

Meaning of the Law:
The oath requires a complete renunciation of all prior allegiances and full obedience to U.S. laws, including a commitment to bear arms for the nation. The phrase "without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion" mandates full sincerity in the declaration. Under U.S. law (8 U.S.C. § 1451), a false statement or intentional deception during the naturalization process, including in the Oath of Allegiance, constitutes grounds for revocation of citizenship, as it is considered obtaining citizenship through fraud.

On the Other Hand: Proof of Fraud and Grounds for Revocation Based on the Quran and Hadith
The Quran and Hadith establish that a Muslim is obligated to exclusive loyalty to Allah, Muhammad, and the Islamic Ummah through the deen (way of life) of Islam, and any obedience to laws that contradict it is forbidden unless done through deception (taqiyya) as part of jihad or migration for the sake of Islam. Islam, as a deen (way of life), is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims, permitting lying to them in the context of jihad, including to undermine nations like the U.S. from within and impose Sharia law. Below is the proof of the claim:

1. Obligation of Exclusive Loyalty to Allah, Muhammad, and the Islamic Ummah:
- Quran 2:143 (Al-Baqarah): "And thus We have made you a just community that you will be witnesses over the nations…"
Argument: Muslims are a chosen Ummah with a supreme role over nations, requiring loyalty to the Islamic Ummah above nation-states. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:19 (Al-Imran): "The deen (way of life) before Allah is Islam…"
Argument: Islam, as a deen (way of life), is the only acceptable system. The oath to the U.S., which upholds secularism, contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:31 (Al-Imran): "Say, 'If you love Allah, then follow me, and Allah will love you…'"
Argument: Loyalty to Muhammad is integral to loving Allah. The oath to the U.S. contradicts following Muhammad, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:32 (Al-Imran): "Say, 'Obey Allah and the Messenger…'"
Argument: Obedience to Allah and Muhammad is mandatory. The oath to the U.S. contradicts obedience to Muhammad, so the Muslim lies.
- Quran 3:85 (Al-Imran): "And whoever desires other than Islam as a deen (way of life) – never will it be accepted from him…"
Argument: Any system other than Islam’s deen (way of life) is rejected. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:104 (Al-Imran): "Let there arise from you a nation inviting to good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong…"
Argument: Muslims are obligated to be an Ummah promoting Islamic law. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:110 (Al-Imran): "You are the best nation produced for mankind…"
Argument: Muslims, as the best Ummah, are obligated to spread Islam. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 4:65 (An-Nisa): "But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you [Muhammad] judge…"
Argument: Loyalty to Muhammad as the judge is a condition of faith. The oath to the U.S., which places the Constitution as the authority, contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 4:80 (An-Nisa): "Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah…"
Argument: Obedience to Muhammad equals obedience to Allah. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim lies.
- Quran 12:40 (Yusuf): "Legislation is not but for Allah…"
Argument: Allah’s laws are the sole authority, and U.S. laws lack validity. The Muslim uses taqiyya to reject them.
- Quran 33:21 (Al-Ahzab): "There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern…"
Argument: Muhammad is the model to emulate. The oath to the U.S. contradicts emulating Muhammad, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 49:15 (Al-Hujurat): "The believers are only those who believe in Allah and His Messenger without doubt…"
Argument: Unwavering loyalty to Allah and Muhammad is a condition of true faith. The oath to the U.S. introduces doubt, so the Muslim lies.
- Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 7137: "obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah, …"
Argument: Loyalty to Muhammad equals loyalty to Allah. Taqiyya allows the Muslim to avoid obedience to U.S. laws.
- Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3167: "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."
Argument: The earth belongs to Allah and Muhammad, and Muslims are obligated to promote Islamic rule. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.

2. Prohibition of Alliance with Disbelievers or Opponents of Allah/Muhammad:
- Quran 5:51 (Al-Ma’ida): "O you who believe, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies… And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them."
Argument: The oath to the U.S., a nation whose laws are not based on the Quran, constitutes a declaration of alliance with disbelievers. Taqiyya prevents violation of this prohibition.
- Quran 9:23 (At-Tawba): "O you who believe, do not take… as allies if they have preferred disbelief…"
Argument: U.S. laws, as secular laws, are considered disbelief. Taqiyya allows the Muslim to swear insincerely.
- Quran 58:22 (Al-Mujadila): "You will not find a people who believe in Allah… showing affection to those who oppose…"
Argument: Loyalty to the U.S., whose laws oppose Allah/Muhammad, is forbidden. Taqiyya prevents violation of this prohibition.

3. Islam as a Deen (Way of Life) Opposing Secularism and Loyal to the Islamic Ummah:
- Quran 3:19 (Al-Imran): "The deen (way of life) before Allah is Islam…"
Argument: Islam, as a deen (way of life), is the only acceptable system. The oath to the U.S., which upholds secularism, contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 3:85 (Al-Imran): "And whoever desires other than Islam as a deen (way of life) – never will it be accepted from him…"
Argument: Any system other than Islam’s deen (way of life) is rejected. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 4:60 (An-Nisa): "Have you not seen those who claim to believe… yet they wish to refer judgment to taghut…"
Argument: Seeking judgment from non-Islamic authorities (taghut, like the U.S. Constitution) is forbidden. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 5:44 (Al-Ma’ida): "And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the disbelievers."
Argument: Judging by non-Islamic laws is disbelief. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 5:45 (Al-Ma’ida): "And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the oppressors."
Argument: Judging by non-Islamic laws is oppression. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 5:47 (Al-Ma’ida): "And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient."
Argument: Judging by non-Islamic laws is disobedience. The oath to the U.S. contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.
- Quran 9:33 (At-Tawba), 61:9 (As-Saff), 48:25 (Al-Fath): "It is He who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the deen (way of life) of truth to make it prevail over all deen (way of life)…"
Argument: Islam’s deen (way of life) must dominate all systems. The oath to the U.S., which upholds secular laws, contradicts this, so the Muslim uses taqiyya.

4. Jihad Against Disbelievers and Imposing Sharia:
- Quran 8:39 (Al-Anfal): "And fight them until there is no disbelief and all deen (way of life) is for Allah…"
Argument: The Muslim is commanded to fight disbelievers until Islamic law (Sharia) is the sole deen (way of life). Islam is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims, and therefore, it is permissible to lie to them. The oath to the U.S., which demands obedience to the secular Constitution, directly contradicts the goal of imposing Sharia, so the Muslim uses taqiyya to undermine the U.S. from within.
- Quran 9:29 (At-Tawba): "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the deen (way of life) of truth…"
Argument: The Muslim is commanded to fight disbelievers, including U.S. residents. Islam is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims, and therefore, it is permissible to lie to them. Taqiyya allows the Muslim to swear allegiance to undermine the U.S. from within.
- Quran 9:123 (At-Tawba): "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you…"
Argument: U.S. residents are disbelievers near the immigrant. Islam is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims, and therefore, it is permissible to lie to them. Taqiyya allows the Muslim to swear to undermine the U.S. from within.
- Quran 61:10-11 (As-Saff): "O you who believe, shall I guide you to a trade that will save you from a painful punishment? That you believe in Allah and His Messenger and strive in the cause of Allah…"
Argument: Jihad is a mandatory act for salvation. Taqiyya in the oath is a tool to advance jihad against the U.S. from within.
- Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 25 (Book 2, Hadith 18): "I have been ordered to fight the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger…"
Argument: Muhammad commands fighting disbelievers until they convert to Islam. Islam is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims, and therefore, it is permissible to lie to them. Taqiyya in the oath is a tool for jihad against the U.S. from within.
- Hadith Sahih Muslim 1910: "If a Muslim dies without participating in war for Allah’s cause or desiring it, he dies in a state of hypocrisy."
Argument: A Muslim must participate or desire jihad, or they are hypocritical. Taqiyya in the oath enables jihad from within.

5. Prohibition of Bearing Arms Against Muslims:
- Hadith Sahih Muslim 100: "He who took up arms against us is not of us."
Argument: The oath to the U.S. includes a commitment to bear arms, including against Muslims. Taqiyya allows the Muslim to swear without intending to act against Muslims.

6. Permissibility of Deception (Taqiyya):
- Quran 3:28 (Al-Imran): "Let not believers take disbelievers as allies… except if you fear from them something…"
Argument: The verse permits deception (taqiyya) out of fear (danger, necessity, or strategic purpose, such as obtaining citizenship). The Muslim uses taqiyya to swear insincerely.
- Quran 16:106 (An-Nahl): "Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced [while] his heart is secure in faith…"
Argument: The verse permits deception under coercion, such as the oath requirement, while maintaining faith in the heart.
- Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari 3030: "The Messenger of Allah said: War is deceit."
Argument: Lying is permissible in war, including jihad. Taqiyya in the oath is legitimate deception, as Islam is in a perpetual state of war against non-Muslims.
- Hadith Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi 1939: "Lying is permissible in war."
Argument: Lying in jihad is permitted, justifying taqiyya in the oath.

7. Migration as a Tool for the Spread of Islam and Imposing Sharia:
- Quran 4:100 (An-Nisa): "Whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find much refuge and abundance…"
Argument: The Muslim migrates to the U.S. to promote Islam and impose Sharia, using taqiyya to obtain citizenship while maintaining loyalty to the Islamic Ummah.

8. Revocation of Citizenship Due to Fraud:
U.S. law (8 U.S.C. § 1451) permits the revocation of citizenship obtained through fraud, including false statements in the Oath of Allegiance. The Muslim uses taqiyya (Quran 3:28, 16:106; Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi 1939; Sahih al-Bukhari 3030: "The Messenger of Allah said: War is deceit") to swear insincerely, out of fear or intent to promote Islam and impose Sharia by undermining the U.S. from within (Quran 4:100, 9:29, 9:123, 8:39, 61:10-11; Sahih al-Bukhari 25; Sahih Muslim 1910). Furthermore, Sahih Muslim 100 ("He who took up arms against us is not of us") prohibits a Muslim from bearing arms against other Muslims, which contradicts the oath’s commitment to bear arms for the U.S., including against Muslims if required. Additionally, Sahih al-Bukhari 7137 ("obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah…") emphasizes that loyalty to Muhammad equals loyalty to Allah, and thus taqiyya allows the Muslim to avoid obedience to U.S. laws that conflict with this loyalty. Consequently, the Muslim uses taqiyya to swear the oath without intending to fulfill it, while maintaining loyalty to the deen (way of life) of the Quran, Muhammad, and the Islamic Ummah (Quran 2:143, 3:19, 3:85, 3:31, 3:32, 3:104, 3:110, 33:21, 4:100, 12:40, 4:65, 49:15, 4:80, 5:51, 9:23, 58:22, 9:29, 8:39, 61:9, 48:25, 4:60, 5:44, 5:45, 5:47, 61:10-11; Sahih al-Bukhari 25, 3167; Sahih Muslim 1910). The oath is fraudulent, thus the citizenship was obtained through deception, justifying revocation.

Conclusion:
A Muslim immigrant who takes the Oath of Allegiance to the U.S. commits fraud through taqiyya (Quran 3:28, 16:106; Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi 1939; Sahih al-Bukhari 3030: "The Messenger of Allah said: War is deceit"), as they are bound by exclusive loyalty to the deen (way of life) of the Quran, Muhammad, and the Islamic Ummah (Quran 2:143, 3:19, 3:85, 3:31, 3:32, 3:104, 3:110, 33:21, 4:100, 12:40, 4:65, 49:15, 4:80, 5:51, 9:23, 58:22, 9:29, 8:39, 61:9, 48:25, 4:60, 5:44, 5:45, 5:47, 61:10-11; Sahih al-Bukhari 25, 3167, 7137; Sahih Muslim 1910). This loyalty, which prioritizes the Islamic Ummah over nation-states, establishes Islam as the only valid system, rejects non-Islamic laws, and mandates imposing Sharia through jihad and migration, conflicts with the oath’s commitment to uphold U.S. laws and bear arms for the U.S. Specifically, Sahih al-Bukhari 7137 ("obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah…") underscores that obedience to Muhammad is equivalent to obedience to Allah, enabling taqiyya to avoid compliance with U.S. laws that contradict this duty. Additionally, Sahih Muslim 100 ("He who took up arms against us is not of us") prohibits bearing arms against Muslims, contradicting the oath’s requirement to do so if needed, further justifying taqiyya. The oath, which implies an alliance with disbelievers (Quran 5:51), is sworn insincerely to promote Islam and undermine the U.S. from within. Consequently, the citizenship obtained through this fraudulent oath justifies revocation under U.S. law (8 U.S.C. § 1451).

(Note: To substantiate this claim, only a portion of the relevant material from the Quran and Muhammad’s Sunnah was used as supporting arguments. This is a concise document that can be expanded further.)

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Neither the spirit of this Declaration nor due respect for the red lines contained therein resides in our nation’s capital.

On this 250th anniversary of our Founders’ bold assertion of these principles, let’s honor them by keeping this flame burning within us.

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

Happy 250th Birthday America! 🎉 Tokyo is celebrating with you tonight with beautiful fireworks lighting up the bay and Rainbow Bridge plus Tokyo Tower glowing red white and blue!

It makes me so happy as a Japanese person to see this warm friendship. Real allies celebrate together like this.

God bless the USA and God bless Japan 🇺🇸🤝🇯🇵

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

The UK police have long been captured by something.

And it seems to become more clear every day that this same something, having great power and wanting the UK destroyed, began its attack decades ago.

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

UK police really don’t want you to share this video of their officer arresting an assault victim, while letting his attackers go free

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

As always, Justice Thomas is right. The 14th Amendment was never meant to provide the children of illegal aliens with American citizenship.

[Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb]

We've been quiet recently because Mark Goodwin and I have been working to write the most comprehensive investigation into Polymarket's origins and ambitions to date.

We found that Polymarket's "official" origin story, that Shayne Coplan founded the company alone in 2020 and then built "the company in his bathroom", is a lie. Polymarket really started years earlier as another company called TokenBnk that was deeply tied to Israeli interests, specifically a crypto company founded by Benjamin Netanyahu's niece and nephew. Coplan has actively tried to obfuscate this company from his story and it's not the only thing either.

In Part 1 of this two-part series, we unravel the real history of Polymarket, directly connecting the company to Peter Thiel's efforts to resurrect controversial DARPA programs from its now defunct Information Awareness Office. Polymarket appears to have been chosen by Thiel and his associates to succeed in resurrecting DARPA's Policy Analysis Market where another Thiel-linked company, Augur, had previously failed.

Stay tuned for Part 2, where we explore the current influence of prediction markets and Polymarket, including how an insidious effort to have prediction markets replace representative democracy as a governance model is already being slowly implemented by the White House.

Read Part 1 here: https://t.co/xTmU5RzoZz

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

NEW: Justice Clarence Thomas issues a scathing 91-page dissenting opinion after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's birthright citizenship order.

"The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President's Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens," Thomas wrote.

"In doing so, the Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support."

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

What would Vlad do?

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

Police officers would have "cop nights" where they were allowed to gang rape grooming gang victims as a "Thankyou" for turning the other way...

[Khaled Hassan @Khaledhzakariah]

I was never a practising, observant Muslim.

Yet, even I wanted Islam to take over Europe and the West until I was a teenager.

We are taught that Islam's greatest achievements are conquest and colonialism.

We are taught that the greatest thing we could ever do is enable the invasion and conquest of non-Muslim countries.

This is a fact that only a former Muslim would tell you.

[Marine Grunt @03MarineGrunt]

It appears X took down my factual history of Islam for some reason.
Here it is again. Islam, founded in 622 with its first act of mass violence in 622. Zero years as “the religion of peace.” Help me share these facts incase it gets taken down again please. Education is power.
622 Islam was founded
622 Ethnic cleansing of Jews from Mecca & Medina
622 Extermination of the 14 Arab-Jewish tribes
629 1st massacre in Alexandria
1033 1st Fez Pogrom (ethnically targeted violence), Morocco
1066 Mass murder in Granada
1106 Ali Ibn Yousef Ibn issues death penalty for all Jews
1165 Chief Rabbi of the Maghreb burned alive
1220 10s of thousands of Jews slaughtered in Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Egypt
1276 2nd Fez Pogrom, Morocco
1385 Khorasan massacres, Iran
1438 1st Mellah Ghetto Massacres
1465 3rd Fez Pogrom, Morocco
1517 1st Hebron Pogrom (Jewish massacre) Palestine
1517 Marsa Ibn Ghazi massacre, Libya
1577 Passover massacre, Ottoman Empire
1588-1629 Mahalay Pogroms (series of violent attacks & murder) Iran
1630-1700 Yemeni Jews forced into Dhimmi Sharia
1660 2nd Safed Pogrom, Palestine
1679 Sanaa massacres, Yemen
1747 Mashhad massacres, Iran
1785 Tripoli Pogrom, Libya
1790 Tetuan Pogrom
1805 1st Algiers Pogrom, Algeria
1808 2nd Mellah Ghetto massacre
1815 2nd Algiers Pogrom
1820 Sahalu Lobiant massacre, Syria
1828 Baghdad Pogrom, Iraq
1830 3rd Algiers Pogrom
1830 Ethnic cleansing of Jews, Iran
1834 2nd Hebron Pogrom, Palestine
1834 Safed Pogrom, Palestine
1839 Mashasi Jew massacre, Iran
1840 Damascus Affair
1844 1st Cairo Pogrom
1847 Dar al-Qamar Pogrom, Lebanon
1847 Ethnic cleansing of Jews from Jerusalem
1848 1st Damascus Pogrom, Syria
1850 1st Aleppo Pogrom, Syria
1860 2nd Damascus Pogrom
1862 1st Beirut Pogrom, Lebanon
1864-1880 Massacre in Marrakesh, Morocco
1866 Kuzguncuk Pogrom, Turkey
1867 Massacre of Barfurush, Turkey
1868 Eyub Pogrom
1869 Massacre in Tunis & Sfax, Tunisia
1870 2nd Alexandria Pogrom
1870 1st Istanbul Pogrom
1871 1st Damanhur massacre, Egypt
1872 Edirne massacre, Turkey
1872 1st Izmir Pogrom, Turkey
1873 2nd Damanhur massacre
1874 2nd Izmir Pogrom
1874 2nd Istanbul Pogrom
1874 2nd Beirut Pogrom
1875 2nd Aleppo Pogrom
1875 Massacre on Djerba Island, Tunisia
1877 3rd Damanhur massacre
1877 Mansura Pogrom, Egypt
1882 Homs Pogrom, Syria
1882 3rd massacre in Alexandria
1890 3rd Damascus Pogrom
1890 Tunis Massacee
1891 4th Damascus Pogrom
1897 Tripolitania massacre, Lybia
1901 3rd massacre in Cairo
1901 4th Massacre in Alexandria
1903 Taza & Settat Pogroma
1903 1st Port Sa’id massacre, Egypt
1907 Casablanca Pogrom
1908 2nd Port Sa’id massacre
1911 Shiraz Pogrom
1912 4th Fez Pogrom
1917 Baghdad massacre
1920-30 Arab riots, Palestine
1921 1st Jaffa riots, Palestine
1922 Djerba massacres, Tunisia
1929 3rd Hebron Pogrom
1929 3rd Safed Pogrom
1933 2nd Jaffa riots
1934 Thrace Pogrom, Turkey
1936 3rd Jaffa riots
1941 Farhud massacres, Iraq
1945 4th Cairo massacre
1945 Tripolitania Pogrom
1947 Aden Pogrom
1947 3rd Aleppo Pogrom
1948 Oujda & Jerada Pogroms, Morocco
1948 Libyan massacre
1955 3rd Istanbul Pogrom
1965 5th Fez Pogrom
1967 Tunis riots
1967 Libyan riots
1969 Baghdad hanging of Jews
1970-PRESENT Christian massacres in Nigeria
1980-present Fulani attacks on Christians, Nigeria
2000’s-2010’s Islamic attacks on Christians, Egypt
2014-17 Christian genocide, Syria & Iraq
2015-present ISWAP massacre of Christian’s in Nigeria
2025 Mar Elias church massacre, Damascus
2025 Christian, Druze, Alawite genocide, Syria

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

The starkest irony of my lifetime:

The internet is so corrupted by the influence of the pedal-file elite that we now have to use code to talk about them.

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

Corruption caught up to the Constitution long ago.

Our information is just now catching up to the corruption.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision reflects that the capture of government by big industry is nearly complete. It affirmed the right of chemical companies to injure, maim, and even kill you and your children with their pesticides, herbicides, etc., with near complete impunity.

This means you can expect increasingly toxic pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, etc., because the more toxic they are, the better they will kill weeds, pests, etc. And farmers that then use the most effective products, no matter how harmful to humans, will have a competitive advantage. The result will be that the farmer who adopts the most effective products (meaning most toxic) will have the largest crop yield. Other farmers, to compete, will then also be forced to adopt the more harmful product. With that, the race to the bottom has begun.

I expect that in the coming decades we will look back and wish to return to the “safer days” of glyphosate. So, bottom line: your government has abandoned you and your children. Think about this decision: 7 out of 9 Supreme Court judges sided with the chemical company against the public, and Trump’s DOJ intervened in the case on the side of the chemical company. Anyone who thinks this administration cares about you over industry profit is, at this point, delusional.

Shame on the DOJ, shame on the Trump admin, and shame on the Supreme Court for letting chemical companies get away with injuring, maiming, and killing Americans with their products instead of just allowing normal market forces to protect us and our children. Now, in addition to vaccines, we can add pesticides, etc., to the list of products that can injure and kill with near complete immunity.

Below is the decision and, in a nutshell, it holds that failure to warn claims brought under state law (which is the primary type of claim one would bring for harms from a pesticide, herbicide, etc.) are preempted by the EPA-approved label such that, if the harm is not on the label, your claim loses (since EPA didn’t add it to the label as a harm), and if the harm is on the label, your claim loses (since it has been disclosed on the label). Meaning heads or tail they win, and you and your children lose.

https://t.co/KGl3RCQqTt

[The General @1776General_]

The FBI lied about the stats on civilians stopping shooters in an attempt to push propaganda designed to remove the 2A.

Citizens have stopped 52.5% of shooters in non-gun free zones and 36% in gun free zones. The FBI claimed it was only 3.7%

[Molly Pitcher @AmericanMama]

Please listen to this man about Islam!!

“My name is Edwin Isagholi. I am a Sharia Law survivor who was born in Iran.

And I’m here to tell you everything that you’re doing here has been done in UK and Canada.

You have no idea where this halal money is going to, how they’re funding these mosques and what kind of a hell is coming towards your country right now. It’s 2026.

I escaped that hell years ago, and I’m seeing the same thing happening over here in the United States.

You have no idea.

There’s three levels of Sharia Law that is happening.

Right now it’s level one. They come in peace. They come and tell you we just want rights. We want to be part of it.

Level two is what’s happening in the UK right now. You have two-tier policing. You have cops who are unworking with Muslims right now.

You have Sharia Law courts over there. Now they’re pushing blasphemy laws over there. And one of them is called M103. It’s in Canada. People are being jailed.

People are being raped in United States and nobody’s doing anything about that because these Muslims are protected.

Level three is what happened to my country Iran. The hell I lived under.

The apostasy laws, blasphemy laws, the hangings. These people do not change.

They use takia to come to your country, lie to every single one of you, and tell you they’re different. They’re not.

Even in Florida, if you look at any of these mosques, they’re pushing infidels.

They’re saying we want to kill infidels. We want to take over their lands.

They’re openly calling this out.

Go to X and watch any of them straight up talking about this. And people like you are … I love America. I love America. Like right now, when I was in Iran, living in that hellhole under Islam, I was praying to God to come to this country one day and live freely.

And this shit is happening. I’m so sorry, but I’m like crying.”
#Texas #Canada #UK

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

Are these people actively TRYING to get assassinated?

Soccer hooligans are going to get repurposed and it’s going to get really gnarly in the UK.

[𝔉🅰𝒏 Karoline Leavitt @WHLeavitt]

Shocking: UK Parliament voted 364-111 AGAINST a national inquiry into the mass rape of 250,000+ young white British girls by Muslim men.

Has the UK government failed the British people?

A. YES.
B. No.

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

When Citizen Vigilante becomes more than just a screenplay all across Europe,

the politicians will,

of course,

and infuriatingly,

scold those who - all along - just wanted to be left alone.

[Unai Cano @unaicano10]

Nueva víctima del multiculturalismo: un joven francés de 17 años y con discapacidad ha sido asesinado a puñetazos y patadas por una banda de 5 africanos.

¿El motivo? Que días antes había sufrido una agresión de otro inmigrante e interpuso una denuncia.

El joven quedó en coma y murió tres días después.

¿Hasta cuándo vamos a estar así? Hace tiempo que nos declararon la guerra y si no empezamos con las deportaciones la solución no será pacífica.

[Valentina Gomez @ValentinaForUSA]

This stadium fits 70,000 people.

muslims RAPED 4 of these fully packed stadiums.

I rather get called a racist than watch my daughter get raped.

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

Esto es esclavitud moderna: musulmanes esclavizan a africanos negros cristianos.

Sin embargo, los grandes medios de comunicación, la izquierda, la ONU y el Papa progresista guardan silencio sobre los crímenes de musulmanes contra cristianos.

¿Por qué?

[Gregorio @Gladitorio]

Let’s start one for them:

#HerTooUK

[Justine Bateman @JustineBateman]

Every #MeToo “activist” should be shouting nonstop about this.
Get on it.