@JoJoFromJerz I know that they were both wars where we tried to tell another country how they should govern themselves, and also were wars we had trouble getting out of.
@BlairMichealMa1@MelGibsonlidz They would have to enrich it to 90%. Assuming they did admit to 60%, why shouldn't they? trump canceled the deal, so they are no longer bound by it.
@joec1234@MelGibsonlidz The only information we had came from inspectors, yet the administration would have you believe that the situation had suddenly changed on February 28th, and they now posed an imminent threat. There could not have been any new information.
@hsweetwood23@MelGibsonlidz I know that the only information we had came from inspectors. Whether they are producing weapons grade Uranium can only be determined by direct inspection.
@dridgel@MelGibsonlidz Despite the rantings of trump and netanyahu, it doesn't make any sense that they would use it against Israel. It doesn't help the Palestinians reclaim their land if everything is radioactive.
@Paulnvegas1@MelGibsonlidz While there was a treaty, inspections were necessary to verify that they were in compliance. We had no other source of information about what they were doing. The claim that the situation suddenly changed and they now posed an imminent threat is a lie.
While the treaty was in effect, we could verify that they were in compliance, because they were subject to inspection. When he cancelled the deal, inspectors were no longer allowed in, so we now had no way of knowing what they were doing. He caused that uncertainty to attack them.