@superalesha That’s shifting the goalposts.
Books become public once published. The model never claimed to be open-source.
It’s guarding against competitors, mass fake accounts, and the algorithm — thieves, not ordinary users.
By your book logic, is every reader guilty?
Over the last few months, we’ve made significant progress in reducing the effectiveness of distillation attacks against Claude.
In this post, we explain how: https://t.co/uWiRSLBuOS
@gimcall For thousands of years, the Chinese people have only developed a sense of resistance when oppressed to the point of starvation (and sometimes they still just endure it). It has always been this way throughout the millennia.
@cp_credimen@yoursnandieni One more thing: those American companies you mentioned never entered the Chinese market, yet they’re doing just fine. And China’s market is far bigger than India’s, so stop fantasizing.
@XiZnping I have no idea how Musk does things, but I understand the Chinese Communist Party well — they follow the classic play of ‘openly repairing the plank road while secretly crossing at Chencang.’ Joining the WTO is a textbook case.
That’s because most people are kept from going abroad by income and information gaps. The fact that someone can’t get out doesn’t mean they don’t want to. Try seeing how hard a U.S. visa or an EU visa is for Chinese people, and how hard immigration is to obtain—the approval rate is extremely low. Have you ever heard of large numbers of people smuggling themselves out of developed countries?
Credimen Lab has launched a new project: Chaos.
Chaos begins with scattered information rather than a predefined model of intelligence—no settled boundary, hierarchy, or objective.
The project explores how relationships form, persist, and change over time, and under what conditions order and intelligent behavior may emerge from them.
Instead of deciding in advance what intelligence should look like, Chaos starts with disorder and observes what actually forms.
https://t.co/4BvZ3wr8xl
China is good at packaging things up and relying on sheer numbers (human-wave tactics) to paper over quality gaps—whether in tech or on the battlefield.
Why China’s AI cannot be No. 1—and can only chase the leader by copying and distilling.
The Self-Strengthening Movement in the late Qing more than a hundred years ago already gave the answer. “Chinese essence, Western utility” cannot save China. Because any idea first has to pass political correctness, censorship, and whether it fits the Party’s requirements. Even buying a domain and putting up a simple website means filing for an ICP license and waiting more than 20 days before it can go live. That kind of ritualistic process is hard to believe.
Under this kind of mechanical thinking for so long, innovation is strangled, and so is the passion of founders. If you really want a flourishing “hundred schools of thought,” you first need the soil of freedom.