@Neuroendocrine_ With due respect and FYI…….If you have not had a NETest there is no biological or genomic basis to ascertain if you are stable. Imaging highly insensitive and only looks at Euclidean space a tumor occupies as opposed to molecular biology of the tumor itself.
It's the invasion of the idiots. The discourse on biomarkers proves Eco to be correct. What is needed is a measurement of plasma Luddite levels amongst the self-acknowledged NET cognoscenti!
Umberto Eco criticized social networks, saying that "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner.
It's PHAEO Awareness week: Real-time monitoring of phaeo
NETest identifies 100% of phaeos and ganglioneuromas.
Gone are the days of buckets of smelly old urine collection!
At last a group of surgeons who understand that there is a technique to identify residual disease without waiting for the 2 years before imaging shows so called “recurrence “ @spartelli
Professor Massimo Falconi @SanRaffeleMI and his colleague @spartelli reflect on a novel liquid biopsy #NETest as a promising new blood biomarker for the surgical management of pancreatic #NETs.
https://t.co/MLyjzkVW65
What do you all think?
#PanNETs#NeuroEndoTwitter#MedTwitter
As a response to the grotesque incivility of Karger who acting like Caligula, declined to respond to the Editorial board’s reasonable request for collegial discussion and planning a thoughtful way forwards, >80% of the Editorial board resigned en masse. Condolences to Caligula...
In a crude commercial fashion lacking collegiality/civility, Karger capriciously dismissed scientific doyen, Prof R Millar, Editor of Neuroendocrinology. His apparent fault was that his leadership propelled the journal to the highest IF journal in the field. Way to go Karger!
I am incline to believe that the Dunning Kruger effect is a dominant policy driver in NET investigation and acclamation of the relevance of novel observations. Need a "winter palace" movement not Brunonism for progress
@NeuroEndoTalk Amazing that with >2,500 receptors on a cell that SSTRs still remains the only object of desire (sic) and imaging them the only tool. Hullo! Let's advance beyond a 30 years obsession with SSTR. Radiation sensitivity biology has little to do with SSTR expression.
@NeuroEndoTalk Like this!!! Nice focus! Too much endless review, self fulfilling consensus and repetitive guidelines. Need objective comment and discussion. Currently XS pharma supported pharma bloviation and pseudo scientific pontification. Remember it is all about the patient!
Blood genomic analysis and Wolfram type mathematical modelling/analysis are the future of the accurate prediction of the efficacy of disease management. Indubitably we need to move away from opinion, "consensus" and empiricism to facts not fallacies @stephen_wolfram
We're excited to introduce a fully unsupervised #DeepLearning model for abnormality detection in medical imaging. The model achieves AUC 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92) with further option to fine-tune using only a handful of expertly-labelled images! @EMQUIRE_@djlmed@iCAIRD_Scot