Gojo.
All three have potential counters to Infinity.
Makima's sacrifice ritual targets people remotely by name.
Itachi's Tsukuyomi activates through eye contact.
Madara's Infinite Tsukuyomi works through moonlight.
Infinity stops approaching attacks, not necessarily direct effects.
You speak as though Messi is far from reaching the 1,000-goal milestone as well.
For context, Messi scored his 900th goal just six months ago, and he's already on 932 goals.
Meanwhile, Ronaldo scored his 900th goal two years ago, and he has yet to reach 1,000 goals.
Your preaching carries no weight because Messi is just 68 goals from 1000.
Let me preach.
Every four years we have over 25 players winning the World Cup. Countries and a lot of players have won the World Cup. A lot for players have won the Balon Dor regardless of how many an individual has.
Now if Ronaldo reaches the 1000goals, he will be the only person since existence of mankind to reach that milestone. Do you know how great that is.
.@arjunnchand When is the top 5000 xp holders getting Perps access🙂
I want TO Make the solana:Aybt5BWuW6kMNt7Jk1UmSgLzpEKev5pEnh82TA5rpump into the PERPs world
yesterday @jumperapp did $42M in volume
60% bridging
40% swaps
most people still know jumper only for bridging
but today our product has many advanced trading features for swapping across 50+ chains - and offers better coverage across chains and assets
limit orders, twaps, quote simulation, and many other small improvements that we’ve made over time to provide excellent execution
increasingly more users are using jumper for swapping daily
if you love Jumper for bridging
you’ll love it for swapping
give it a try 🫡
My Jumper airdrop speculation 👀
In my opinion, Level 20+ is where you’re probably safe.
For the Legion Sale, Jumper prioritized users at Level 20 and above roughly the top 3K–4K users.
Arjun Chand also mentioned that top @jumperapp users will be rewarded.
So if history repeats itself, Level 20+ could very well be the benchmark for who qualifies as a “top user.”
Meaning there’s a real possibility that users below Level 20 could miss out.
Just speculation for now… but the pattern is definitely there. 👀
To the top users,See you at TGE
⚠️🇵🇹 Portugal manager Jorge Jesus last night: “I didn’t read Cristiano’s statement, I was watching Portugal U21 game”.
“I will now have time to read it”.
“Dr Messi “ that can’t speak English😂. just leave it at Goat please and stop this fooling. He isn’t intelligent outside football. I even thought it was a joke o
Been looking into @fungolabs and this one is still very early.
They’re building an encrypted NFT collection on Ethereum mainnet using @zama, with a total supply of 3,232.
500 spots are set aside for free mint
232 for the team
2,500 for public sale
Public mint pricing hasn’t been revealed yet, so there’s still a window to try for one of the free whitelist spots before things get crowded.
Apply here: https://t.co/6Bs6tgEa7i
I’ll admit Zama being involved is what made me look twice 😅
Still, don’t take that as an endorsement. Read through the project yourself before putting money into the public sale.
Good luck if you’re applying.
I went through this thread twice and the part I kept coming back to was the GenVM.
Most of the smart contracts I've worked around are comfortable when the world can be reduced to something deterministic.
Give it an input.
Run the logic.
Get an output.
Clean.
Real life is rarely that clean though.
A contract may need to know whether somebody actually delivered what they promised, whether an event really happened, what a webpage currently says, or what two people meant when they wrote an agreement in normal English.
You can't solve every one of those cases with if true, pay A; else, pay B.
That's why the way @GenLayer is approaching this caught my attention.
Their GenVM can work with live web information and plain language, then a group of validators independently evaluate the result and come to a verdict.
That opens up some interesting things.
Prediction markets are an obvious example from the thread. Instead of token holders manually voting on what happened, you could have validators actually look at the information needed to resolve the market.
But I think the bigger question is what happens when autonomous agents start making agreements with each other at scale.
Because agents will disagree.
One API will fail halfway through a job.
One agent will interpret an instruction differently.
Something on the web will change.
A task will technically be completed while still being nothing like what the buyer expected.
Those are the cases I would want to throw at a system like this.
Not because the happy path isn't important. I've just spent enough time building automated systems to know that's usually the easy part.
I want to see what happens when things get messy.
And if GenLayer can make that judgement layer reliable without putting one company or one model in charge of the answer, then I understand why they're calling it an Internet Court.
The internet never had a judge.
AI agents are about to move $9 trillion. Nobody built the part that handles disagreement.
GenLayer did.
And now you can become part of it: https://t.co/vmIxBNIdZu