@JamieBonkiewicz Setting aside the obvious hypocrisy that everyone else is mentioning, the second line doesn't even counter the first. At all. Nothing in that line shows that someone is a Nazi.
Unless we're operating under "Hitler liked dogs therefore liking dogs makes you a Nazi" logic.
@seamus_coughlin "Human rights" can mean either natural rights or what someone believes should be societal rights. In my experience people referring to natural rights have no problem saying natural rights instead, but for some reason the societal rights people don't like the term societal rights.
@libsoftiktok "the virus I'm trying to eradicate."
I'd say something just to prove a point, but I'd rather not deal with the double-standards of having my point proven.
@hicock45 @TheAKGuy@katy4congress@FreedomCFund I mean, 1 person is all @katy4congress needs to block a walk if she is that 1 person.
That.. is what that event description means, right? She's blocking others from walking?
@libsoftiktok On the one hand, it's not clear if he meant it literally figuratively.
On the other hand, given how msm says "car drove into people" instead of "person drove into people", it's entirely believable that "trigger puller" is their way of removing responsibility from the shooter.
@AmericanNachos Only thing I have an immediate problem with is the car moving while the kid is running beside it. What if he trips and part of him goes under the car?
Everything else needs more context before EITHER condemning OR condoning.
@sleepy_devo By that logic, me going to court over a speeding ticket is the same thing as Ted Bundy going to court for all his murders because we're both going to court to plead our case.
@GoodAmericanMan I don't know that I'd go that far, but consequences are definitely in order.
Problem is blue states making it difficult to do anything other than walk away. If I try to do _anything_ and it escalates, my blue state prosecutor is going after *me*.
@libsoftiktok@ChrisMurphyCT Not surprising since he also opposes what HE will call due process rights.
From the donkey's own mouth, "And those due process rights that now apply to every blue state, in addition to every red state, are in there because people like Thom were driving a hard bargain."
@rittenhouse2a@Everytown Funny how, six years later, they continue to peddle the lie that you were "illegally armed". That was the one charge that you were so definitively not guilty on that the judge dismissed it before it even reached the jury.
@libsoftiktok I get why some people would oppose it, but I would find it hard to get upset if criminal aliens were being sterilized by having their twig and berries removed.
@TheAKGuy Some states have been infringing on 2A for so long that for them it would be radical. I'd love to see all states stop infringing on gun rights, I'm just unsure how quickly it should happen.
Though I guess "we can't stop breaking the law overnight" has its own problems.
@dmpcarey@JohnCleese Sounds like you're trying to have their home country be both safe and dangerous. Safe enough for Debra and Old John to remain, but dangerous enough that the young fit men need to seek refuge in another country.
Schrรถdinger's Home Country if you will.
@mbelanger227@SophieMae1022@ScottPresler And my position is that if they aren't done with their sentence, if they are still a danger, they shouldn't be released.