@iey0beeW@QuizmasterGAAve@cafreiman Some rise, some fall, most remain in the class of their birth. Upward mobility is a function of talent, luck, and structural opportunity. As a culture, we’ve always celebrated the “rags to riches” story despite its statistical rarity (see: dominant ideology of individualism).
@iey0beeW@QuizmasterGAAve@cafreiman Ah, the old “culture of poverty” theory (Oscar Lewis). Largely debunked. Culture matters, but structure is primary in a causal sense.
@iey0beeW@QuizmasterGAAve@cafreiman I hope you understand that observing a few of your neighbors is not a valid empirical basis for making generalizations about societies.
@iey0beeW@QuizmasterGAAve@cafreiman Explaining poverty by invoking the traits of individual poor people (while popular) isn’t accurate. Poverty is primarily structural. The fact that the US has more of it than other affluent democracies is a function of politics.
@DaddyBoyNYC@esrtweet@blog_supplement Though SAT scores are strongly sensitive to test-prep/coaching introducing confounding by SES and weakening any true correlation with IQ.