@misiqsevici@Providnik1 Does that really make sense to put the most important measure of what you have in common to be the most easy and likely to change all the time ?
Should we really focus on fickle bounds ?
Do you really think it's even wise or useful let alone a deep truth ?
@misiqsevici@Providnik1 Your argument might stay the same to your biologically blind mind.
But it changes everything, a Japanese student has no biological reason to have solidarity with some Albanian.
That changes things, it makes "in common" brittle and changes the second one of the two get a job.
@misiqsevici@Providnik1 Italian factory worker and politician has the same genes -> same genetic interests, his success is the indirect success of every other Italian genetically, that's not true of a Rwandan student.
And whether you want it or not we are evolved towards our genetic interest.
@misiqsevici@Providnik1 Italy and France are genetically as close as different Han Chinese subgroups, Share a very similar culture and the same religion.
That's not exactly a great proof when you already shave off most of the other differences to begin.
@misiqsevici@Providnik1 If you took one of these hunter gatherer, gave him a shirt and put him in front of a computer, I would still have basically nothing in common with him, even if he played the same games as me, because he's an African bushman he'll never have the same goals worries or dreams.
@misiqsevici@Providnik1 What is "in common" ?
Because it's clearly not genes or culture
I'd have though what you are biologically and how you see the world would be important to define things "in common"
Apparently only your occupation counts, I guess gamers should rise up against the rest of the world
@RexStructorum@0x11_1f@ItIsHoeMath Then what are you talking about ?
You said his hyperbole undermines the argument.
To whom ?
You also said you "don’t believe in a vulgar democratic “marketplace of ideas.” "
so I guess not to most people either.
Then who are his arguments undermined for ?
@Keypad_K@UnbanMikiBot@Beacon160172 Sad display
You could have just admitted you didn't know what you were talking about and your views are based on nothing real
Or admit you were rhetorically outdone
Better yet stop answering if your ego is fragile
Glad you made clear you didn't have any arguments left I guess🤷♂️
@Keypad_K@Beacon160172 I can give you examples maybe to help your monkey brain ?
Most Indians are stupid
Ramanujan is not stupid
Ramanujan is not most Indians
Ramanujan is smart
The average Indian is not smart
Per capita India produces less smart people than France
Hope this helps, though I doubt it.
@Keypad_K@Beacon160172 Your "example" was a whataboutim in the first place retard, I'm talking about races and peoples as a group and you talk about an outlier individual from that race as if you can't understand the concept of an average or generalizations.
Why should I answer that seriously ?
@Keypad_K@UnbanMikiBot@Beacon160172 Correct, well appart from whatever the natives invented like some dumb flute or whatever bullshit.
Basically every American invention is an European invention with a few other race's inventions sprinkled in.
How is that retarded ?
@Keypad_K@UnbanMikiBot@Beacon160172 If you recall this conversation was about genetic diversity and IQ in populations and race mixing
What is genetic/racial about the place of your birth ?
Classic retarded pedant tactic shifting the goal post and pretending not to understand grasping at straws to save shreds of ego
@jason_dhaluin@DebunkGauchiste Super idée qui donne envie de chanter autour du feu main dans la main.
sauf que c'est pas vrais.
Le QI est génétique a 80%
Les cerveaux sont comparable ok mais sa veut rien dire, tout est comparable.
Par contre Ils ne sont pas égaux ni entre les individu ni entre ethnie/race.