This exactly!!! “If the policy was God’s instruction why did it need amending”. Therein lies the problem - it was man’s instruction !!! Religion changing based on the whims, feelings and thoughts of humans
This is what happens when men claim divine authority over medical decisions. The doctrine evolves. The dead don't. And the institution never apologises, it just quietly moves on.
If the policy was God's instruction, why did it need amending? And if it wasn't, who answers for the lives lost under it?
That’s the thing sir. I don’t trust you. How can a smile from someone who is by the looks of it 7-8 years old, indicate that she understands what is going on ??? You may want to rethink what you’re saying.
@fiszix@meghanncuniff Intimidation how? Clearly the pros and judge intended to intimidate the witness into testifying and saying they would hold him in jail as punishment for not testifying until the conclusion of the trial of all 27 defendants. He also confesses to a crime during said meeting.