Paweł Grad

Philosopher based in Warsaw, Poland. Epistemology, philosophy of religion, philosophy of perception.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

[NEW PAPER]. Against the mainstream view in the literature, I argue that hinge commitments can be evaluated in terms of evidential support, based on an interpretation of a theory of conceptual development. Enjoy!

https://t.co/75XLAV99GJ

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@KedzierskiMarc @pawelmilcarek Szukałbym w ogóle poza opozycją proponowaną przez N.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

In it, I argue for a new, hopefully less psychologically demanding version of epistemological disjunctivism, as well as for the unique epistemic role of perceptual phenomenology. Sorry zombies!

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

The paper I announced here a few months ago is finally out in Episteme. https://t.co/daLsA3QlFP

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

I will be speaking about the rationality of religious hinge commitments at this wonderful event in Dublin. For online participation, visit: https://t.co/3t9ZRoohfv

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

This paper, written approximately three years ago, was one of the first from my most recent project. My last publication in Episteme (https://t.co/bzQpfl1q5b) builds upon and further elaborates the ideas initially developed in this paper.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

NEW PAPER: I propose a version of the disjunctivist account of the epistemic and rationalizing power of perceptual experience.

https://t.co/Yi7Ug0uNde

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

My argument engages with Siegel's claim that perception itself is epistemically evaluable and proposes an alternative solution to the so-called problem of hijacked experience.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@KonradTWerner No purpose? It’s autotelic

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@GMiziula Fejczur: https://t.co/EUDhOx4kZ6

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@_G_Martina I know Eklerownia (Ecláir shop) - it’s very special. Sezon is good wine and tapas bar. I also know a nice place with napolitana, but I don’t think that it is appropriate to advise Italian on pizza place.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

[NEW PAPER]: My take on what grounds epistemic power of perceptual experience. I offer an answer in terms of presentational phenomenology, albeit with a disjunctivist twist.

https://t.co/1UCdPORuVU

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@andrzejdragan Jakiś argument poza ogólną fascynacją rozwojem technologii i prostą ekstrapolacją trendu na podstawie tego „czego możemy się podziwiać”?

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@sekowskik @EthanELandes instead of cognitive science. And keep in mind that they are continuous. But not the same. There is a gate between them.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@sekowskik @EthanELandes Actually, that attitude to philosophy of perception I’ve learned from naturalists. All you need is that there are specifically philosophical questions that are not asked by perception scientists. You don’t need question naturalism. Just do naturalized philosophy…

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@EthanELandes @sekowskik Don’t fight with me. I just want to suggest what gatekeepers have in mind. In general I am open to find philosophy wherever it is 😉

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@EthanELandes @sekowskik Well, they say that it is continous, not that is the same. So you need some sort of demarcation and gatekeeping.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@EthanELandes @sekowskik And McGinn, Truth by Analysis.

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@EthanELandes @sekowskik Sad. Maybe Williamson from metaphilosophical works?

[Paweł Grad @GradPawel]

@EthanELandes @sekowskik Or even more old-school Strawson from Analysis and Metaphysics? There is also nice paper by Jeff King that is a modern take on philosophical analysis.