graham Lamont

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@mancunianmedic @LucyGoBag This

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@LucyGoBag I hope that they do , but given Reforms track record I feel that is unlikely. This concept that they have top class people as a team to look at this seems unlikely - presumably chosen for their ability to follow orders - what could possibly go wrong?

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@Dr_BellaR Don't pay too much heed -: every one thinks their own speciality is the best choice

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@LucyGoBag A well crafted thread highlighting the importance of supporting teachers and youth workers in how to deal with the issues this drama raises. Just showing to all teenagers will not be a panacea

[Supertanskiii @supertanskiii]

Who knew that Trump (an admirer of autocrats globally) hiring a bunch of thick as fuck billionaire and millionaires to his cabinet based on blatant nepotism, naked corruption and their ability to generate sensationalism, would result in incompetent idiocy? I, for one, am shocked.

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@Jeremy_Hunt You never managed that in your time. The processes were really quite flawed

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@jfdwolff Thanks for the reply

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@Haggis_UK I know that La Truss suggested it but surely it was just one of these things that sensible people kick into the long grass

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@AbbieTBee Afraid that it is just the way blokes often manage things - you can ignore it as long as your wife understands it. Odd but very common approach

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@LucyGoBag You are supposing they actually read them and possibly take a pro active stance on them. More likely that it is helpful for any future enquiries to say that you had them on your risk register

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@alfe_joseph @allenanalysis ...ir because scouts would never find against Trump in any case

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@AvonandsomerRob @JonathanPieNews Thought maga would be more apt

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@neilorpen @mancunianmedic Feels like a management consultancy have come up with patient pathway to maximise opportunity for private investment then tried to fit how patients could fit into it. No thought of how to actually use people's skills appropriately

[Dr Richard Webb @DrRJWebb]

Does it involve improving recruitment & retention, ensuring appropriately qualified and experienced staff are in the right roles, building and improving the NHS estate, investing in our currently woeful tech and IT, more admin staff, reducing inefficiency & funding primary care?

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@Peston It's a rehash of previous work - fair enough as a concept but the thought that the private sector has the spare capacity just waiting is at best fanciful. They will either pull existing staff from NHS sites or expect help to recruit overseas

[graham Lamont @GrahamLamont473]

@GlasgowWarriors Do love the updates on this feed. Have you thought of moving off X and on to Blue sky?

[Supertanskiii @supertanskiii]

Facts matter.

On this app nowadays, facts will probably struggle to get 500 likes from an account with 230k followers.

Some speech is deliberately more free than others now. Divisive disinformation is boosted because the algorithm is controlled by a racist headcase.

[Celia Richardson @CeliaRichards0n]

This year our properties will host 58 Santa’s grottoes and 2 Mother Christmas story times. The Mother Christmas reading events are not new. The world may have gone mad but I don’t think this has been caused by 2 children’s reading events.

[Dr Robert Laurenson @RobLaurensonD4P]

If ever there was evidence of a captured regulator it is this post.

It’s not about ensuring high quality clinical standards of the professionals it regulates.

It’s about political collusion to curate a regulatory environment tailored to the desires of the state, not patients.

This is 2008 Moodys.

But it’s not finance.

It’s our health.