@slanoue2016@JohnBarrowman i watched some of the review bombing. i still made up my own mind. it was crap, and started midway through capaldi’s era. not wanting a female doctor doesn’t make you sexist btw. i believe they should have kept time lords and time ladies seperate as they used to.
@BestFromtEast@UNgreatestgamer@DoctorWhoWorld_ doesn’t have to be white, but should be male. and as for sexuality just chuck it all in the bin. Get back to Time Lord/Time Lady format. Emma D’arcy would make an excellent regen of Romana/Susan/River. Most important though write great stories.
@BewilderdBadger@Qui_Quae_Quod42 it was stupid writing. Jo Martin could have been a great future doctor, or a regen of Susan, The Rani, The Doctors Daughter, River/Melody, but instead they did the Timeless Child nonsense
@judypancoast love the theory. i liked the idea of the movie but for the first hour was mainly corridors and furniture, am afraid I did find it boring. I also didn’t like the suspense build up everytime someone went in the backrooms. Yes it would be for their first time, but not for the viewer
@CarioCapital@DiscussingFilm I didn’t know it was a thing on YouTube so only the film to go by. I agree with this, was very boring. If you like walking round second hand furniture shops and the series Severance which is just walking round corridors, you’ll like this. I hated it. 3.5 is generous.
@DoctorWhoWorld_ Great chemistry, being independent and where they can improve one another. For me Donna was probably the best at this. Went from being ‘just an office temp’ to such a confident and brilliant companion. Also was a moral compass for The Doctor.