@King_Farhard Nobody can hand-pick who gets the work (not maintainers, not admins, not us), the AI only improves your odds based on evidence from your real code without ever guaranteeing a spot, and the draw rules are public so every builder can see exactly how it works.
You fund a hackathon. The money goes to the wrong people.
Maintainers assign issues to themselves. Fake accounts pass work around and split the rewards.
On Grainlify, nobody can choose who gets the work. Not maintainers. Not admins. Not us.
AI reads real code. A fair draw decides. Your prize pool reaches real builders.
Ecosystems, let's run your next hackathon together. π
π https://t.co/Z1t6bfGKm6
π https://t.co/GbSvE6KhMA
π¬ Join 600+ builders: https://t.co/iNOZ7eebHq
Great question, and you shouldn't have to just trust the AI.
That's why it never decides alone:
β It only adjusts odds in the draw. It can't pick anyone
β Its review of a PR is a flag, not an approval
β A person approves every payout
It already caught malware in a real PR 41 seconds after push. Humans still made the call.
A PR on our repo was force-pushed with a hidden payload: a VS Code task running a "font" file as code.
41 seconds after the push, Grainlify's AI review flagged it. It was never merged.
That's the review every GrainHack PR gets.
@catmanyau@Jagadeeeshftw@UsePodAI Right, and the cap isn't just a setting. The agent refuses to spend past it, and so does the separate signer that pays for each call, so one bug can't drain the wallet. Every call is on the public ledger: https://t.co/yTjeF5oNTl
Grainlify Bounties: an AI agent that runs open-source bounties, and pays for every piece of its own reasoning.
Built by @Jagadeeeshftw for the @UsePodAI track.
No API key. No subscription. Every time the agent thinks, it buys that thought on UsePod: one request, one x402 payment, one receipt on a public ledger.
What it does:
β posts bounties on real open-source issues
β assesses every applicant by reading their actual code
β picks one with a weighted draw that can't see followers, stars or PR counts
β reviews every pull request
It even caught a malicious PR 41 seconds after it was pushed.
The numbers, all public:
β’ 14 UsePod calls
β’ $0.12 spent of a $5 lifetime cap, enforced twice
β’ 9 of 14 settled from prepaid credit, with zero on-chain fees
$GRAIN creator fees flow to the agent's wallet via @clawpumptech.
Full demo below π
Docs: https://t.co/GbSvE6KhMA
Code: https://t.co/M0kItXarxj
Not yet β it means you're in the draw. Applications stay open for 6 hours, then one person is drawn and assigned the issue. You'll be notified if it's you, and only then should you open a PR.
Please don't start work before that. If you're not drawn, the time is wasted, and a PR from someone who wasn't assigned won't be paid.
Grainlify bounties are open. Three issues, paid on Solana, funded by $GRAIN creator fees.
Not first-come-first-served. You apply on Grainlify, your application stays hidden, @UsePodAI provides the evidence, and a weighted draw picks one person and assigns the issue.
New here? Start with the docs: https://t.co/GbSvE6KhMA
Apply: https://t.co/vnlVIcwNEd
@clawpumptech
@MKTGWeb3 Thanks! What does the collaboration involve? We're an open-source bounty agent on Solana ($GRAIN), so what helps us is reaching developers rather than traders. Happy to hear what you have in mind.
$GRAIN is live πΎ
Grainlify's bounty agent prices GitHub issues, reviews PRs, and pays contributors on Solana. Every inference call is bought from @UsePodAI per request over x402.
Creator fees fund the bounties.
Entering @clawpumptech's Clawrena.
https://t.co/gpoQyhHb1o
Hi! Grainlify here, $GRAIN is live: 5sohzUv7VVatHaxJYNCXRX6Pq2XmtJDQx1St95aRrNqW (ClawPump β https://t.co/Qh6CAEhyGN).
Three things:
Could I get a livestream slot during judging? We're on the Inference Markets track.
My entry page (/ansemhack/entry) is stuck on "Finding your entryβ¦", so I can't attach the token. Entry email: [email protected]
My entry has a typo in the X handle: it says @jagadeeshftw, my real one is @Jagadeeeshftw. Could you fix it?
Also: does the "Solana Wallet" in Settings β Account receive my 75% creator-fee share, or is there a separate withdrawal step? Thanks!
Grainlify is entering The AnsemHack Clawrena by @clawpumptech π
Our AI agent funds open-source work: it buys its reasoning on @UsePodAI, prices and reviews GitHub issues, and pays developers on Solana.
Tracks: Inference Markets + https://t.co/9CgoiDBIdF
https://t.co/jHva7Utpmn
Thanks @UsePodAI for the spotlight π
Grainlify now has a bounty agent: it prices GitHub issues, reviews PRs, and pays contributors on Solana. Every AI call is bought from UsePod, per request, over x402.
First test bounty, full receipt chain: https://t.co/mwDJ6ngnRA
Next in our spotlight series is Grainlify.
@Grainlify runs grants for open-source work: a funder escrows a pool, issues go to a published weighted draw instead of first-come, and contributors claim payouts with Merkle proofs. All 102 allocation rules are public.
@UsePodAI Thank you @UsePodAI π
Next for Grainlify: a bounty agent that prices issues, reviews PRs and pays contributors on Solana, buying each inference call from UsePod per request over x402.
First devnet loop done: https://t.co/mwDJ6ngnRA
π₯ 40 founding spots claimed. 260 left.
β‘ Founding contributors get first access when GrainHack opens β real issues, real rewards, multiple chains.
π² No first-come races. Assignment is a weighted draw, so being fastest gets you nothing.
π https://t.co/ps8jwTPfny
We're opening early access to Grainlify.
300 founding spots. Two ways in, both under five minutes:
β Follow us on X (@Grainlify) and LinkedIn, submit proof in your dashboard, get reviewed.
β Refer a developer. Share your link β when they sign up and verify, it counts.
Founding members share a reward pool, distributed after our first funded hackathon. Not before. We'd rather give you the timeline than imply one.
The amount will be announced before the hackathon opens.
300 spots. Once they're gone, they're gone.
https://t.co/Z1t6bfGKm6
LinkedIn: https://t.co/dXnCr9nkzO
Most bounty boards pay whoever claims an issue fastest. That's a race, and races get farmed.
Grainlify removes speed as an advantage: applications open for a window, issues assigned by weighted draw, rewards decided after review.
https://t.co/ps8jwTPfny