@McBrightside01@factpostnews In less than a month since the first case, we're already over 130, which is more than 20 of the 30 years you posted stats for.
@VIK19941@NoDreamWorld4me@PopBase Ah yes, because famously felony trials move so quickly. In TX for example, you're lucky to get a preliminary exam in 9-12 months for a run of the mill felony charge without a lot of moving parts.
@boss_mario@johnjoe@RealRossU Take 10 seconds to read the very next message Hunter sent. It says Joe wants absolutely nothing to do with it. We wouldn't want you to actually learn something though.
@FloridaGalPal@RachelBitecofer@RealRossU While Ross certainly isn't to blame for others' choices, that you're trying to blame Biden, while your graph shows it skyrocketing under Trump, and increasing by much smaller amounts under Biden is absolutely hilarious.
@stanlongwell @ShadowofEzra "Just"? Can't even read it says 2019 eh? Also, any "leader" that would withhold aid based on a different political ideology is a dictator.
@5star_kiddo@bustanutent@Fightful I'm just going to go out on. Alimb and assume that's the cat lady from the Star and Globe magazine covers in the 90s and early 2000s.
@MitchDTom@ChaseForLiberty Preponderance is a coin flip +1%. It's what they use for probable cause, the minimum legal standard. In this case, the standard was: Ross had access to the account along with others, including 2 feds imprisoned over the case, and this was dismissed with prejudice.
The "victim":
@War4theWest@jeremykauffman Yes, that was just mythology. Not only was that charge dismissed with prejudice.
In fact, Curtis Green, the "victim", doesn't believe the allegations and has been advocating for Ross' release since the beginning of his incarceration.
@yeschadai@cryptomanran Eh no. The guy in charge of the process said day 1. He's had months to plan and a larger legal team than most corporations to write up his day 1 plans. Should just be another document in the stack waiting on a signature.
@Melchizedek1972@GavinNewsom@pepinomarino Because common sense, mixed with even a bare minimum understanding of how zoning works would show you the tweet you're standing up for is entirely made up, whether you believe Newsom or not, doesn't matter.
@Ghostof1896@HustleBitch_@CommunityNotes Because said politician literally doesn't have the power or capability to do what is claimed, meaning the tweet you're defending is entirely made up, and thus is obviously not worth defending.